HN user

daniel-thompson

1,489 karma
Posts2
Comments260
View on HN

Completely bespoke models are typically trained in Python using tools like TensorFlow, JAX or PyTorch that don't have real non-Python alternatives

The article outlines some interesting ways to evade this problem. What's the latest thinking on robustly addressing it, e.g. are there any approaches for executing inference on a tf or pytorch model from within a golang process, no sidecar required?

I mean, it _could_ be the job. But a lot of older doctors feel like the younger generation needs to go through the same struggles and hardships they did. This reminds me of something I occasionally see in my parenting of my kids - the desire I have for my kids to do things that validate _my own_ childhood experience.

I think it's a pretty simple, and timeless, aspect of human nature:

"People are generally better persuaded by the reasons which they have themselves discovered than by those which have come into the mind of others."

- Blaise Pascal, 1670

one of my favorite pieces of financial journalism ever, https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/newsletters/2019-10-23/mon..., explains how he got the bux during wework's collapse:

[softbank's offer to rescue wework] is the result of Neumann’s holdup power: Prior to the deal, Neumann is still the company’s controlling shareholder, and he could just say no to a deal that he didn’t like. That might completely evaporate his own wealth, but it would evaporate a whole lot more of SoftBank’s, and it kind of looks like SoftBank blinked first: In effect, the price of Neumann allowing SoftBank to rescue WeWork was that SoftBank had to hand Neumann a billion dollars for himself

I know Docker isn't something Apple makes, but still, this makes me laugh. I run a fair number of containers as part of my daily workflow and the memory overhead, compared to a generic linux amd64 box running the same thing, is on the order of 10x. So for me it's actually more like, 8GB on an M machine == 1GB "regular" RAM.

Analogue 3D 3 years ago

Can you elaborate on this a bit? I'm not too familiar with this scene but I'd like to get one, and not the crappy $14.99 version at the local big box retailer.

The author demonstrates attaching services to a context, which afaict goes against the Go authors' usage recommendations in https://pkg.go.dev/context:

Use context Values only for request-scoped data that transits processes and APIs, not for passing optional parameters to functions.

I'm no astrophysicist, but the paper and some web data show

- Sag A* has a mass of ~4,000,000 times the sun, and an event horizon of approximately 12,000,000 km (0.08 AU). This is just the event horizon; Sag A*'s accretion disk has a diameter of about 150,000,000,000 km (1000 AU). So your intuition would certainly be right about Sag A* - there is a huge disk of gas and other junk you'd be flying through.

- This object has a mass of at most ~12 times the sun, and (if it's a black hole) an event horizon of approximately 35 km. The paper doesn't say anything about an accretion disk given that it's exploring the idea that the object is not a black hole. Regardless, a star orbiting at 1.4 AU would probably clear out everything in the immediate neighborhood.

When I was in high school I could ace most of it without studying at all. I thought it was great at the time, but the shitty part - only apparent later - was that I failed to develop good study habits.

When I started at university in a technical major, it was a real kick in the teeth. The material was substantially more difficult, but the hardest part for me - and the biggest piece of learning - was the realization that I had to study consistently and be purposeful about managing my time in a way I never really had to before I got there.

My grades freshman year were abysmal. But they also helped me internalize that I needed to buckle down and put in the work. I'm glad that that happened in a relatively forgiving environment like school, instead of in the workplace.

Local LLMs do best on big GPUs, which aren’t an option on Macs.

For processing speed, Ms are fast but I agree not anywhere near a top Nvdia chip.

For memory size, the memory on an M chip can be used as graphics memory, so a person could get an M2 today with 128GB of graphics memory for ~ $5k. Not bad considering an Nvidia chip approaching that memory size is several times that much.