HN user

damentz

32 karma
Posts1
Comments9
View on HN
Logging sucks 7 months ago

I'm pretty sure by verbose it's the realization you've wasted precious time reading AI bloat that you'll never get back. On top of that, now you need to reread the text for hallucinations or just take a loss and ignore any conclusions at risk that they came from bad data.

Correct, another way of looking at it is from a programming angle. If Debian fixes a bug that breaks your tool, then Debian is unstable. Therefore, to maintain stability, Debian must not fix bugs unless they threaten security.

The term "stable" is the most polluted term in Linux, it's not something to be proud of. Similar to how high uptime was a virtue, now it just means your system probably has been pwned at some point.

Ya you're not being honest in the slightest. The OP likes the music made by the group he mentions. You instead say he's being racist for liking music of that group. I'm having a hard time discerning if you're trolling or serious.

Liquorix Kernel 4 years ago

I agree, I'll think of something more suitable to replace it. There's already good feedback in this thread I can work with.

Liquorix Kernel 4 years ago

For the most part, Liquorix should always lose on throughput benchmarks. Most of Phoronix's benchmarks focus on those.

You can check the comments regarding a discovery that certain sched_yield configurations destroy performance on out-of-tree schedulers and was amended post benchmarking.

This however was using MuQSS, which was notorious for poor single thread performance. Liquorix now uses PDS which attempts to use all physical cores before deferring to SMT threads. This completely changes performance for lightly threaded workloads.

There's been no news-worthy benchmarks since Liquorix switched from MuQSS to PDS.