cwmoore

I still believe taxing the bots, and implementing actual UBI, would address both problems.

Not unrelated, this kind of information augments all kinda of law enforcement, greatly increasing the lifetime consequences of convictions, though sentencing penalties have remained the same.

Last century, a year in jail ended after the year. Now it is still there for every job application, lease, and loan you might take out in life.

The justice industry benefits with easy information, punishments are amplified and permanent, but crimes keep happening.

Let’s reconsider whether our medieval system benefits society or simply controls and exploits it.

Taxing the bots for UBI would help more people than it would harm.

Sure, so then what does society do with all of the cheap energy? Human nature is still there. Among other things, leads directly to discarding even more plastic junk wherever it’s convenient and no one complains too much.

I am offering NFTs for https://ouruboroi.com/qr/9d1c15

How do you think I got this island?

It was off-topic already. You driving it further is obsessive and ill-intended.

Don't leave out jails, without insurance and significant funds, that's what democracy has decided for you.

What you call rotten attitudes seemed like fairly thoughtfully doing the research you left out of an opaque and off-topic character determination.

Read-only or read never is looking wiser than it did a few years ago.

I am not upset. It is obviously obstusely, impenetrably vague. What is your problem?

Is it not obvious? Replace “fairly despicable” with “white nationalist” instead of whatever anyone might imagine could make a mathematician despicable?

:) did I get downvoted for quoting AI generated text?

I don’t think it is majority of the value created, but it might have to be a significant portion of the value expended to make it worthwhile at all.

High certainty statement, where did you get that from?

< 150 in 30 days? I thought Reddit was popular.

Who wrote this?

“ I'll keep pulling this data. If there's a specific cut you'd want to see — a different vertical, engagement over time, how scores correlate with anything — tell me and I'll dig it out of the next month's worth.”

Have you asserted or waived your rights? You may have the right to consult an attorney.

I like the idea but I wonder if your market might be larger still by including precipitation and sunlight, elevation, tax rates, and distance from highways.

I do not know the whole picture, but if you are asking for blind one-shot CSS, you might benefit from wiring the model to take screenshots of various end-browsers and discuss them as you iterate.

Offering freelance estimates for CSS design changes before frameworks were around was a problem.

I mean...from "superstitious zealots" to follow Jesus in the same line is a sign that something is not working and it isn't all in fun, right? Would you expect zero ongoing issues to arise from years of pharma-funded tough love messaging?

The homeless provide a visible incentive to work harder and pay more in rent, and property owners and other taxpayers certainly engage city services (mostly enforcement) in competitive battle for the big bucks. There’s a lot of unrecognized coercion built into the incentive structure underneath the f** y* money tiers. About 50,000,000 hours every day are spent in incarceration, and however many salaries for corrections jobs. The same kinds of system have been around since medieval times.

I am not aware of any real tests of effectiveness of these organizations, but I am a huge proponent of progressive UBI so that the systems might actually serve people with chronic or recurring need and not simply being dragged along. What we do as a democracy is cede the status quo to paternalistically penalizing the poor out of contention, and is pretty ethically corrupted bh it’s own effectiveness.

Jail time is a sure spiral into unemployment and homelessness, privations, and more jailtime.

Erstwhile elsewhere whilst among the midst of the unbeknownst, someone is singing along to Taylor Swift songs I would not recognize. In a democracy of ideas, it is the lightning and not the cloud that makes it thunder. You Britons do sound smart.

I can only wonder what percentage of human conceptual abilities are expended on rebuttal.

Compare to enticing youth, compounded over decades

It had better be all in good fun—-or else

I think this method could do well with handwritten journal entries and artists’ sketchbooks, that add another dimension of information.

Due process should never just become a checkbox item. To deal with lives and livelihoods justly, you need appeal pathways and meaningful liability exposure for the processors.

Plagiarism and cheating sucks for everyone. Worth solving.

It is much harder to tell one from the other, and for oneself, than it often seems on the surface.

That seems like a high horse you’re on, how did you get up there?

We all have our selves.

I was thinking more of the problem of choice from an ever vaster array of options within limited resources of time and attention.

But yeah. Still awake, thanks.