cwmartin

That is very similar to the Taskpaper syntax if you end up wanting some additional tooling in the future.

https://www.taskpaper.com

Thanks!

It looks like the linked post may have been taken down. There is a mirror here https://web.archive.org/web/20210513030656/https://cyberlaw.....

Related: The longest valid domain name possible http://a.b.c.d.e.f.g.h.i.j.k.l.m.n.oo.pp.qqq.rrrr.ssssss.ttt...

This feels like it’s in the same family as straw.page[1]. Both are a really refreshing break from homogeneous minimalist web design that’s taken hold over the past few years.

[1] https://straw.page/start / https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26124581

You’re probably thinking about Hey https://www.hey.com. The issue I see with it is that it goes beyond a refreshed interface and breaks IMAP compatibility.

Archive link since the original appears to be down right now: https://web.archive.org/web/20210510151205/https://www.dprev...

For the first time, IDA Freeware ships with a cloud-based, free decompiler for x64 binaries (the decompiler requires an internet connection, and lacks some of the more advanced features that the commercial decompiler provides.)

It's interesting to see that they are opening up the decompiler to free users. It seems as though competition from Ghidra has pushed them to reconsider some of their previous decisions.

Gwern has an extremely detailed article that should provide a lot of inspiration. https://www.gwern.net/GPT-3.

This sounds like it could be an incredibly useful feature in IDEs. It reminds me of the timeline in Fusion 360 [0] which allows you to scroll back through time, make a change to a feature in ‘past’, and then jump back to the present state of the project.

[0] https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360/blog/wp-content...

I believe they mean the lawyer hotlinked [1] their image so that every visitor to the lawyer’s page would result in an image download from their server.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inline_linking

I heard about this from another recent HN thread https://www.mobiussync.com however I haven’t had a chance to try it yet so I can’t attest to its quality.

Is the art more interesting to look about than to talk about?

That is an interesting perspective. I have always judged art by its aesthetics and its ability to elicit thought / conversation equally.

In my view art becomes shallow when it is purely visually appealing with no conceptual backing or purely conceptual with uninteresting visual components.

I found this recently https://topaz.github.io/paste/ where the entirety of the paste is stored base64 encoded in the URL.

I’ve been using Miniflux for the past couple of months and I’ve been very happy with it so far https://github.com/miniflux/miniflux

https://glitch.com is also excellent. I’ve been using it to teach a website development workshop to 10-15 year olds and it’s the most intuitive interface I’ve found so far for those with no prior experience with HTML/CSS/JS.

That seems like the idea behind the ActivityPub protocol that Mastodon and other similar social media platforms are based around.

The largest difference to me is Mastodon's 500 character limit. It leads to conversations that feel much more nuanced compared to Twitter.