cwillu

Sure, but at the same time, I'm not sure either one is by itself a great descriptor (nevermind the emotional valence of those terms)

He's not mistaken in any substantive way: it's still not a public square and those ~780 members have every right to make rules that offer a great deal of discretion to those doing the enforcing, and such discretion is entirely consistent with their other rules.

It is absolutely a thing people do. Google even offers a convenient printout as a way to provide account recovery.

Oh no, someone on the internet is doing something you don't like in a place that doesn't affect you!

“Vibe coded” does not appear in the patch to the terms of use.

“You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools” would seem to clearly prohibit both vibe coded projects as well as heavily AI assisted projects, assuming both result in mostly AI generated code.

The discussion doesn't appear to have been in public at all; all there is on the linked issue is a bunch of first-time posters who wouldn't have been able to vote.

“You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as Claude, OpenAI Codex).”

Seems pretty clear to me?

Two AMD's: A 6 core x, and an 8 core x3d.

Because I'm not on-board with every moral failing that is called “despicable” by someone being disqualifying or even relevant.

A shorthand is generally unambiguous in context; this was not.

“I'll admit the sequence on my end was genuinely disorienting: I verified the determinant three separate ways looking for the error, verified the evaluations twice, ran out of subtleties to check, and only then searched and discovered that the reason it holds up is that it's apparently my own homework — the "fable" in that tweet is Claude Fable, i.e., this model, working with Alpöge.”

Downvotes on a perfectly valid comment is like my opponent letting their clock tick down from 5 minutes rather than resigning when they've clearly lost: it adds a smile to my day.

Thank you, may I have another?

Humans get a free pass

They really shouldn't.

Does nobody remember why fizzbuzz was a thing? People who talked a big game while having no actual competence or understanding of the subject matter?

A tech blog is going to have more than it's fair share of enthusiasts using small self-hosted and similar models; it is entirely possible that that completely accounts for the behaviour described in the article.

It's vector search that's eaten everything that used to have at least a smidgen of parametric search.

And in my experience, there was.

One person's lived experience is another person's “supposedly”.

I expect it's the https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Amozilla-firefox%2Ffirefox... link that phoronix used in lieu of linking to an actual github issue.

Neither of the last two processors I've purchased in the last few years had any iGPU.

Yes.

[0]: > > Did running a ‘cat’ really take more time in '95 than fiddling around the ‘<file’?

It does now for a sufficiently large file. And it's even more extreme when the recipient can do things with a file that it can't do with a pipe.

Processes doing things differently with a file than they would with a pipe is one of the reasons why I default to `cat foo | …`

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23344655

2 ^ (713 739 807 325 663 489 766 475 852 620 783 120 641) digits. Nope, an implementation of that algorithm will never be directly useful.

Yeah, my city is currently going through every bus stop in the city, redoing the pavement in concrete. Construction season has been nasty for us this year :p

Preferably the size of texas

We're talking about a forest the size of texas.

It enables them to build small and entirely undedicated global fan bases.

And no, that is not the only alternative. There is a fine article linked at the top of this very page that points out alternatives that an actual living and breathing artist prefers.

You've been sold a repackaging of “paid in exposure” lie.

And what good does that do those artists precisely?

From the article: “For example, I am paid $0.00029 per stream of a song on Spotify, and even this amount depends on whether the song is being streamed by a paid user or someone using the service for free. This means it will take upwards of 3,500 streams of a single song on Spotify to earn $1.00 versus that same revenue for one iTunes song purchase (not to mention the fact that Spotify refuses to pay the same amount to independent artists as they pay major labels, unlike iTunes). ”

Those results depend on having a 500hz monitor. There's a world of difference between a mildly-buggy rendering loop's 1-frame delay or missing a vsync deadline causing a 2ms delay vs a 16ms delay.

Being able to use ChatGPT is useful, but it is significantly offset by how many business interactions are now mediated solely by chatgpt, and I'm not sure on balance my life has been improved.

So 11pm in B.C. :)

latency should be identical

Should be, but very clearly isn't.