HN user

curious_curios

203 karma
Posts0
Comments100
View on HN
No posts found.

This is pretty standard for specification documents, probably more accurate to say AI sounds like them than the other way around.

Ignoring the particular technologies used (OAuth/JWT) it looks like they’re adding more auth to the devices themselves; think two computers connected to the same network switch not being able to impersonate each other.

Whoever wants to write the underlying engines for virtually every browser: Apple and Google. They both have their agendas that they try to push via them.

A lot of it comes down to the context and a prompting strategy tailored to the particular model. I don’t believe the current benchmarks really take those optimizations into account.

I’ve personally been getting better results with Gemini as well, but I think it’s just because I’ve used it more.

Given that AWS, Azure and GCP are all recording 20-40% YoY growth, no, I don’t think they’re losing ground.

As for startup credits, they’re still handing out $100-200k like candy if they deem you a serious startup. There was a lot of abuse in the past so they started putting up filters.

If you have a moderately successful app, sdk or browser extension you will get hit up to add things to it like this. I think most free VPN services also lease out your bandwidth to make their money as well.

If you’re getting value from it, keep adding it!

Two cases where this advice breaks down:

- If the telemetry boilerplate code starts hampering your ability to read and reason about the underlying business logic code.

- When your observability bill gets too big.