crncosta

Thank you Don Diego https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nCPA3-HURw

The "everything is a string" mantra Will be back!?! The Millenial programmer will try to comment out a line of code while the TCL interpreter Will insists that is a validade code...

Come on guys, let some technologies dies peacefully, Ok? We don't want those days back :)

I really enjoy this type of tutorial format, concise and easy to follow. Thanks for take time to produce it.

Yes, this is exactly the issue. Porting to Python 3 was never an issue itself, but keep your code compatible with Python 2 (while introduce 3) is a nightmare :P

Nice article!

Atwood's Law:

"Any application that can be written in JavaScript, will eventually be written in JavaScript."

I dream with the day we will have a GCC Rust compiler.

Yes, it is a good thing!! I am glad he turn back from his previous decision. His book is nice.

This guy has a very stranger way to promote his job.

He firstly said that Py3 sucks and he can't teach it... and now he is teaching it ;-)

[0] https://learnpythonthehardway.org/book/nopython3.html

I wish a GCC Rust compiler, but it's not planed for 2017. Hope this can change in 2018 :)

The page is not loading... even the cached version from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/ is not loading!

I am really frustrated with the new c2.com pages :P

Lobsters https://lobste.rs/

Trance (psy, goa) for code.

Does any one know if there is a plan for a GCC Rust Frontend?

Very well illustrated.

Here is the wiki you are looking for: http://docs.slackware.com/

For those interested in GNU GCC, there is a more recent document been writing here:

http://thinkingeek.com/gcc-tiny/

The author is also writing blog posts about how to code a GCC frontend. Here is the 7º part:

http://thinkingeek.com/2016/01/19/tiny-gcc-front-part-7/

No, you don't need!

But if you want to publish in a respectful magazine and you don't know how to formalize (in maths) your accomplishment, you will not get accept.

well, I care. But what if I don't have choice? simple don't use it?

I like P6 syntax and semantic more them P5.

My only one problem about P6 is the fact they dropped the effort of having the specification so others can implement the language too. Looks like they prefer a conformance test instead of a formal/complete specification.

While that is perfect fine, I would say having both the test and the spec is even better, for those trying to learn and implement the language.

A good, formal and complete specification will make my learning process much better, IMHO.

In 2016 I would like to see a Rust frontend for GCC, with LTO support and all the list of target backends GCC support.

Definitively.

I am using Debian as my main desktop (laptop in this case) for the last 8 years... sure I am not the only one.

I have suspend/hibernate, great Gnome experience, no issues to run presentations or use public printers, really stable and very fast experience, and I did not configure any system aspect to make it work, just installed the distribution and that works out of box.

Well, I am very happy with Linux desktop. Just presenting a contra-example :)

Great work! thanks for share the idea with us.

As some else mentioned, this is a example of use CSS 3D transforms. Here is a nice intro https://desandro.github.io/3dtransforms/

Looks like this link is broken. When I click I got:

This webpage is not available ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT

Is there any other?

They are providing a official HTML version, alongside the PDF version.

http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/index.html

Really nice job, thank you!

React is patented https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/master/PATENTS which is, IMO, a reason to applaud the rise up of alternatives like this one.

I just hope the author is not infringing React patents in his implementation.

I would like to take a glance. Does any one know where is the Table of Content? Thanks.

I saw perl6 was not accepted too.

Agree.