cpncrunch

Yes, I got that from the comments. But it doesn't explain how they are continuing to sell in other markets. That's the confusing part.

I find this cute and amusing, having had to write buttons in assembly language in the 80s, drawing the buttons into video memory using blits.

Even reading through all the comments above yours I'm still in the dark. Everyone is talking about how they sabotaged their own business, and Carl Pei leaving, but none of that explains why specifically they aren't launching new products in Europe and the US (but still will in other parts of the world?) Something isn't quite adding up here.

Weirdly paywall is borken of safari….just a grey full screen modal overlay with nothing to click. But you can just use reading mode anyway.

It's typical of the Register. They always use the word "boffin" for expert/scientist. It's a british word used to describe a clever person.

Even so, it still seems to be a small effect. The author mentions some studies looking at sunlight vs all cause mortality. These, and more recent studies [1] found much higher reductions in all cause mortality from sunlight exposure, of about 30%. It's thought that other factors may be behind this, such as NO production in the skin in response to UV [2].

[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32918215/

[2] https://karger.com/bpu/article-abstract/41/1-3/130/328295/Su...

Most of the time it's the decisions that kill, rather than pure mistakes. It's possible to mitigate that risk. Good decisions (such as using checklists) can also mitigate some of the mistakes.

Of course when you're dealing with a light twin with geared turbocharged engines, there are additional risks from mechanical failures (such as engine fires), as well as mistakes that can happen when addressing an engine failure (shutting down the wrong engine, getting too slow and doing a Vmc roll, etc).

To be honest I would never fly in any light twin other than a Seminole (which I did my multi rating in).

Non paywall source: https://www.reuters.com/world/ubisofts-co-founder-claude-gui...

Well they're about 4ft diameter and not really even possible to move. My electric chainsaw would just burn up trying to cut them, and the cost of a hydraulic woodsplitter wouldn't be cost-effective.

Current plan is just to leave them there until either they start drying/rotting enough to split, or I find someone who wants to take them off my hands.

It's a combination of technique and the type of wood. Even with perfect technique, some wood is simply too hard to split. I've got the bottom 5 or 6 rounds of a bigleaf maple sitting in my yard that I simply can't make a dent in. You're welcome to take it if you can split it :)

Oddly downvoted?!

Looks like this guy has a history of drug trafficking: https://wchstv.com/news/local/deputies-boyd-county-man-charg...

It depends how you use it. You can either get it to explain a concept, or do your homework for you. Its a bit like the decision students have to make as to whether to review their material before exams or go out partying.

Overall it just seems like a huge waste of money to piss away the huge tuition cost your parents probably paid.

I dont think $15 is ridiculously high.

No, its an excerpt from his book.

Not seeing a paywall in safari. Try incognito.

Read the article….this is a completely different effect.

Never used it, but maybe theres an option you need to tick? Or try asking some ai thing how to get it working :)

This isnt an insurance product though. Its “insurance”, aka extortion.

Not 4 years though.

No, they have a patent so they would be in a hurry to publish if the results were good.

From the comments in the article above, it sounds like it may have failed it's primary outcome (autism symptoms). They only say there was significant benefit for "average of all symptoms", but it isn't clear if that is the same thing.

Study completed in 2022, but still no results posted or study published.

I would say the main downside is not knowing what all your code does, and where to find any particular function.

After the initial coding is complete, will you need to use AI to fix bugs? Presumably that is both slower and more expensive than doing it by hand when you know exactly where to look?

But even if coding time is reduced by half, is that worth the downsides? Coding has never really been a major percentage of my time.

Are you really saving any time at all using AI at all then? If you have to write the architecture for it, write all the rules you want it to follow, check everything it's written, and then reprompt it because it's not how you want it?

No, we just shouldnt be confusing speculation as fact.

We don't have evidence of that either.

Do we have any evidence of higher-ups making bets?

Any evidence of that?

Yes working now.