consp

My guess is the person is drawing from one country and applying it to all. The rules are varied all over the EU. e.g. You can buy pheasant, rabbit and venison at the butcher shop where I live. No hunting required, which you can do but requires a special permit, next to the weapons permit for the shotgun and is very limited in scope.

Even the translated version of the field equations paper has a 1% match only. Which I expected to be a tiny bit higher but still near 0.

Merkel tree audit log of the data, the poor man's Blockchain, works fine and good enough. Now you have a db and you can claim to use a blockchain for pr reasons.

We used to have red diesel for agricultural use which was tax exempt. So they added a coloring agent which would make your tank red and thus noticeable if you used it in a regular car.

I thought wait isn't it lower, but that's imperial gallon which is about 3/4l more per gallon. I always mess those up.

What's the moral guidance and purpose of a tomb of someone who's mourning has passed for over 3 millennia and who has been forgotten due to time?

If you are depending on some behavior not covered in the regression tests, how do you know the next minor release won't break you?

Decades of intrinsic knowledge. Which a rewrite lacks.

imho the issue is the language used. AI rewrites are cheap and cheap exercises require a great deal of scrutiny and proof of correctness. Simply using regressions test lacks the intrinsic knowledge of a decades old codebase stuck in developers minds.

Claiming a rewrite is better because it passes all tests is a flex, a new version requires a boatload of evidence for people to accept it as an improvement and not just "passes tests, written in rust via LLM so it must be better". Run it in production for a year in a sufficiently large system and you might be somewhere.

Maybe you went over 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 twice and came back to positive.

Cause and effect can be delayed.

Less than 1% yoy combined. This is far over that when you combine all failures. Battery degradation is of course excluded.

Mobile, WiFi and GPS would require a substantially bigger battery to achieve the planned 30 days (I get about 25 days). I guess it wasn't a design goal.

The failure rate waving is quite a stretch though. If you take into account reporting rates and time (since most people do not have the watch for long) I'm quite concerned. And I own a PT2. The "look big number, it's not a problem" does not translate to actual sensible failure rates.

To be clear: 51 broken screens in less than two months results in a yearly failure rate of over 1% which is find quite high for a watch.

At the same time, don't hesitate to seek help from a therapist

I'd like to add that for certain kinds of people, the process of doing this on your own is near torture.

I've been there (without the LLMs and antidepressants since therapy is healthier). The 1 year is quite optimistic from my perspective. Good luck though. Prioritize yourself.

The different usages of I or i though ... please fix the LLM type checking it.

sudo useradd -m [username] ?

su [username] ?

Or am I understanding your idea about switching context wrong?

I'm still wondering how this is compatible with laws concerning disabilities, the elderly and those with certain religious believes. They already keep everything governmental related multi modal (you must be able to do it some other way, and almost always this include by proxy and on paper). This is some Draconian way of doing it.

Went with windows 10 for a VM, less cow manure to deal with (still bloated and useless without debloating). After booting nearly all of the calls home got rejected anyway because they were marked as spyware related. I would imagine they got that close to 100% on windows 11.

Gaming on linux is fine, framerates and cpu usage are higher and less despite the wine/proton wrappers.

Sounds like a morning star reference (via some obscure Christian texts) which I will draw further towards Lucifer via Latin. Do with this idea as you please.

Here in the Netherlands it is 877 euro for an A1 call (emergency, no delays), and 384 for B1 calls (non emergency, planable). You also get a 4.83 euro per km cost. You pay up to 375 euro if you haven't had any medical cost that year, otherwise zero.

Stand by cost are about 154 euro/hour. E.g. for sport events.

ICU transport is about 2500. All are law mandated.

The total cost might be more as the insurers also put in undisclosed amounts and some cost is shared with the emergency departments at the hospitals.

So you get other bugs when rewriting in another language without existing tests, got it. This is why I hate all the announcements of "it is rewritten in rust so it is obviously better than the original since it passes all the tests". Edit: and it's an LLM rewrite. Add that to the pile of over hyped messaging.

That last part is I think called negligence. And in some industries that becomes criminal negligence quite quickly.

I have a Lenovo thin client running Debian as internet gateway/firewall. With some minor modifications and a small low power blower fan you can add a dual sfp pcie card in it (not all versions can, though there are more manufacturers of thin clients with 4x pcie slots). The blower fan is because the main fan stops often and it needs some cooling.

So the next step is a hardware or boot firmware backdoor?

(Good to know it remains useful by using openWRT and doesn't become landfill)

We have an 80 kph sign about 6m after the autoweg sign (100kph), why they didn't combine them is anyone's guess. My detection system always misses it, and often there are speed checks. Fortunately I can disable sign recognition for the cruise control.

I've had a few hundred reports over the years as a teaching assistant (digital but must be your own) at the algorithmics course of my university. If I saw that LLM generated uniformity as described they'd all have gotten a plagiarism mark. There were many differences in how people describe things and you could easily see if someone understood the subject or not. That is gone with LLMs as I see it now.

I am pretty sure my job would be on the line if I neglected to report a security issue. It is Google's incentives which are not aligned.

Afaik they did that during calibration. Take known close by objects, compare results, make sure they are the same (up to the capabilities of your ground truth).

While abused by LLM vendors, that phrase in one form or another I've been hearing since the early '00s and it's likely way older.

It's not just google. Try removing an unpublished but uploaded iOS app. Wasn't possible for decades and I guess it still isn't. You eventually could hide them. The only way to remove it was to publish it, but that requires app validation, which a failed app is not suited for.

Inside can be as well. Please manually review these 5000 lines of slop I generated while watching YouTube and verify the unreadable readme due to all the bloat and icons is correct with the code.

If that is not soul crushing I would not know what is.