HN user

confd

42 karma

"Since long before the web, the anonymity of online conversation has lured people into being much ruder than they'd be in person. So the principle here is: don't say anything you wouldn't say face to face."

Posts1
Comments44
View on HN

I didn’t look for anything more current because I was more interested in the GP’s claim that said explosion occurred in 2010.

We find that the number of workers in the gig economy grew between 8.8 and 14.4 percent from 2002 to 2014. For comparison, overall employment increased by 7.2 percent over the same period. Independent contractors constitute a significant portion of gig workers, and grew by 2.1 million workers from 2010 to 2014, accounting for 28.8 percent of all jobs added during the recovery. The online gig economy has experienced significant growth as well. Faster growth in taxis and boarding rooms since the arrival of companies like Uber, Lyft, and Airbnb indicates that online gig jobs are transforming the labor force. In particular, the data suggest that the ride sharing industry has helped bring in an additional $519 million in economic activity from 2009 to 2013, and created 22,000 jobs in the sector.

(2015): https://www.americanactionforum.org/research/independent-con...

This study also appears to use 1099 filings to gauge growth (2015 also): https://www.mercatus.org/research/policy-briefs/evaluating-g...

Here’s a more recent study that gives a balanced take and uses BLS data (2018)

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/independent-workers-and-t...

I’m unqualified to endorse any of these studies, I just figured that I’d share them. Trying to parse the formal distinctions between “gig workers”, independent contractors, and other “nonstandard workers” is a lot of work.

I see. Allow me to clarify my statement. This NPR article has zero links. I think my use of “outbound” was improper to a degree. I was referring to links that lead off of the page. A few articles that I clicked through on CNN have links, but they may not be regarded as “outbound” links because they are all appear to just be links to other CNN stories. The few MSNBC articles I checked out at least have what I’m assuming are proper outbound links in that some lead to entirely different websites.

I’m not trying to refute you. I understand why a publication would prefer not to link to other sites (and I commend MSNBC or choosing to do so according to my observations).

I’m more so intrigued by NPR not linking to anything, anywhere. Especially not a source. The numbers come directly from “the Labor Department” and the rest of the article is sentiment.

I wanted to facetiously parrot Elon Musk’s “NPR is state-run media” claims, but if the attempt at humor were to fall flat I’d hate for the more serious observation to not be considered.

Would you call all Barak Obama supporters "Obamas"?

Not really, but if they were referred to as “Obamites” it wouldn’t be that jarring.

Are they referred to by something different in Arabic-language media?

the damage Apple is doing to society by creating a divisive wedge between people for the sake of luxury signalling.

Would you be able to elaborate on this and provide some examples, please. With respect to iMessage, that is.

As an Unread Information Scientist I find tremendous value in this. It's something worth running locally for research purposes. Great work.

I once made the mistake of subscribing to both tptacek and jacquesm's comments via RSS. I found that they post at a tremendous cumulative volume. This makes it very hard to keep up with in a feed reader. But they have rather good noses for interesting discussions. A way to filter HN posts by stories that have comments by certain users would be interesting to experience.

This sounds like a rough experience. Tangentially, I’m curious about what the future of cities will look like as EVs become more common and charging infrastructure expands. In what ways will cities change the areas surrounding these charging stations to make the duration of the vehicle’s charge more pleasant?

This way of thinking falls apart as soon as the people who are capable of effectively communicating the truth (or at least, gesturing toward evidence that the dominant narrative is being falsified) reach those who are believed to be incapable of comprehending the truth (or at least, the evidence that suggests that the dominant narrative is being falsified).

My techno-optimism 3 years ago

This is a solid take.

The motifs that he evokes in this essay are far too complex for me to digest in confidence from a "Techno-optimist" "tech leader" who is still so relatively young. I'd be more interested in reading this perspective (and its counterperspectives) from someone else.