HN user

clayrichardson

122 karma

https://clayrichardson.me

Email: yo at my domain

Posts5
Comments42
View on HN

I'm spinning up a lab in Santa Cruz to research the local tick population. We could use extra skilled hands to help obtain the distribution of pathogens, and in developing treatment protocols. Plus, who doesn't enjoy a good tick hunt?

Get at me if you're 'bout it: eng at clayrichardson.me

Getting liquidity to short or long on margin is as easy as clicking a button and getting liquidated.

Poloniex, Bitfinex and BitMex are some of the places you can play that game. You can even become a BTC lender on some of those exchanges and get around 20% APR since loans can be compounded every 1-2 days or even shorter depending on the duration of positions people open.

This isn't a new or novel technology, and it's already available for public use.

Can you point me in the direction of this project? I'd like to see what the current implementation looks like.

(or even ice cubes and a glass) you can achieve the same thing.

We're trying to do it at scale and improve on the technology.

real issues behind water scarcity, which has nothing to do with a shortage of liquid water

Can you elaborate on this point?

Where should we spend our time instead?

Definitely not novel at this stage, but once we modify the AWG to achieve water reclamation from urine, would that be considered novel?

The next milestone is to create open source designs for larger-scale, commercially available machines that are prohibitively expensive, and improve upon them. The machines exist and there is a market for them. Is it not worth the time and effort to increase access to technologies like this?

Not just knowledge of chemistry, but actively developing eyedrops to cure cataracts :)

http://www.viewpointtherapeutics.com/team/

EDIT: Wording. Added question.

Our current approach is to get the AWG module working, then add a module which boils urine and feeds the vapor into the AWG module for distillation and filtration.

Ideally, we'd like to use a gasifier for carbon negative power generation, as local biomass can be utilized.

Does this make sense, or do you have a more effective approach?

Thank you for the feedback, this is awesome!

There is always more to read up on and calculate :)

EDIT: The current dehumidifier does accumulate ice on the evaporator coils, depending on the ambient conditions. Once enough ice has accumulated, the compressor turns off and the ice melts into the collection tray. I'm assuming we have to depose the ice out of the dry atmosphere at BRC, since the dew point is below the freezing point of water. Is this not the case?

That is awesome! We'd love to have a chat with you to better understand your thinking process, perspective, and sources.

The pump were using right now consumes 104 W intermittently. For our next prototype, we're going to use a condenser unit from a walk-in freezer (1168W), a split A/C unit to pretreat the air (560W) MinnowBoardMax (15W), duct fan (208W), etc.

It would, but it would most likely be less efficient than filtering the water you're floating in :)

A good way to increase the efficiency of this machine would be to increase the relative humidity by adding moisture. This is the reasoning behind our next planned experiments of reclaiming water from urine!

You might be able to get away with using the reverse osmosis system we have, [0] but send the water to a lab to test influent (intake) and effluent (output) before consuming :D

[0] http://123filter.com/catalog/ispring-7-stage-75-gpd-reverse-...

Indeed. Ideally, we'd like to include a mini-datacenter module, allowing for data storage, streaming, and processing.

We'd like to be able to gather metrics from these machines all over the world, and identify trends in things such as the weather, water production and consumption, efficiency, power generation and carbon sequestration, as well as identify opportunities to improve the operation of the machines through software updates.

Interesting.

  With 32.2C ambient, 14% RH, 1.35C DWP, the absolute humidity is 4.78 g/m^3
  With 24.4C ambient, 14% RH, -4.80C DWP, the absolute humidity is 3.12 g/m^3
Absolute humidity here is specified as grams of water per cubic meter of air.

This is similar to the AH at BRC. Our current model assumes a DWP of -10C — 10C, so we can predict similar performance. We're not taking into account volumetric capacity and the thermal interface of the heat exchangers. If you know anyone able to help point us in the right direction with those calculations, it would be much appreciated!

Our current understanding is the enthalpy of vaporization + fusion for water is (2257 + 333.55) = 2590.55 J/g we want to pull out of the air. This is assuming we can process enough air, since the dew point is below freezing a fair amount of the time.

This is by using this equation specified in the NASA technical note [0]:

  =((0.21668*((TMPC+273)^-1))*((DWPC+273)^-4.9283)*(10^(23.5518+(-2937.4/(DWPC+273)))))*1000
[0]: http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/87878main_H-937.pdf

EDIT: Formatting is hard. Added source. Clarification.