ck45

Lots of common main ingredients like potatoes, beets, cabbage, and sausages. It could also have a different reason, like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Former_eastern_territories_of_...

Not to forget Unladen Swallow Which even tried to merge into CPython: https://peps.python.org/pep-3146/

ed2k, nice! That reminds me of this superb piece of software: MLDonkey (https://github.com/ygrek/mldonkey), written in OCaml.

For me the most clear example (in English and other languages that borrowed from Latin) is "to move" and "mobile".

You seem to be confusing the words "Schmerzmittel" (analgesic, pain killer) and "Betäubungsmittel" (narcotic). Those two classes of substances are not the same.

It’s not, the BtmG literally means narcotics drugs act. https://www.bfarm.de/EN/Federal-Opium-Agency/Narcotic-drugs/... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcotic_Drugs_Act

From the company that brought the famous 8139. See this gem of a comment: http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/pci/if_rl.c?v=FREEBSD-7-0#L...

You either win or you don’t, it’s 50:50

Do Nabaztags qualify to be added? There seems to be a workaround to make them work again.

Well, it's more difficult. The original Volkswagen was designed by Ferdinand Porsche.

Thanks for clarifying! I did some own research and apparaently in those oral hearings, objectors were often tricked into contradicting themselves with quite absurd scenarios.

I don't have intentions to justify an injustice. I'm saying why should we try to make it even harder for a disadvantaged group? It does not help a single German man if women also have to comply to this law. Fixing women's rights on the other hand gives everybody the benefit of living in a society that is more fair. For me, that's a valuable goal.

Well, 2 wrongs make one right, don't they?! I wish we'd first fix women's rights and then extend their duties. What the OP does is just egoistically trying to make other groups also suffer.

What's a reason that is politically and not against one's conscience? I assumed that one's political beliefs would also manifest in conscience.

The cold war has been over for a very long time. The whole process was reformed in 1984 by removing the mandatory oral hearing. Sources say that acceptance rate was above 90% after 1995. That's not good enough (should be 100%), but not terrible either.

I'm not sure how credible it is, conscientious objection is literally in the German constitution: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/englisch_gg.h...

Why does Deutsche Bank pop up in every shady financial deal? Cum Ex, business with Russia, Epstein, some shady deals with his Wingman Trump, and many more. Billions paid in fines, penalties, and settlements. How rotten can an institution be?

Edit: dw covers it: https://www.dw.com/en/deutsche-banks-biggest-scandals/a-5497...

"Womanizer" — or, in legal terms, sexual harassment. https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/16/tech/microsoft-bill-gates...

T-shirts from Muji

Is this based on your experience or is it just an assumption? I only have anecdotes, but it does not reflect your claims, rather the exact opposite. A lot of the boilerplate code doesn’t need to be type annotated, but annotating the main business logic doesn’t take more time and is not more complicated, but instead type annotations help write code that is more clear, more obvious, and it adds some kind of documentation.

The HQ of Microsoft Germany is in Munich.

Edit: Compare to LiMux[1] and the rumors about some deal with MS

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LiMux

I never understood why AOT never took off for Java. The write once run anywhere quickly faded as an argument, the number of platforms that a software package needs to support is rather small.

For me “the problem with software, why smart engineers write bad code” is the prequel. Not as technical, but explains a big problem

I've never seen it that way, but I think you are absolutely right. My favorite always has been https://www.reddit.com/r/TheFarSide/comments/179ikr2/its_a_f...

But then Ruby only goes half way, not unlike the "watered-down form" in your term. Why is `#times` a method of Integer, but `#if` (or `#ifTrue`) not a method of booleans like in Smalltalk? Ruby does the same cherry picking from Smalltalk like everybody else, just different cherries. When looking at Ruby, it feels like the simple examples are all nice and clean but then the weird details start to appear and the language feels more hacky than others (like Ned Flander's house in Simpsons S08E08).

This reminds me of Stephen Baxter's novel "Flood"

One argument that I’m missing in the article is that with an enumerated, states are mutually exclusive, while withseveral booleans, there could be some limbo state of several bool columns with value true, e.g. is_guest and is_admin, which is an invalid state.

Or overloading division like https://scapy.net/

Apache beam does it: https://beam.apache.org/documentation/sdks/python-streaming/

I wanted to wash my eyes the first time I saw it.

No allocations, reminds me of WUFFS, which also comes with a GIF decoder: https://github.com/google/wuffs/blob/main/std/gif/decode_gif...

Bamboo is not solid wood, it's bamboo stems glued together.