HN user

chrisseaton

36,438 karma

Researcher at Shopify // PhD in Ruby // Founder of TruffleRuby // Squadron Leader of the Cheshire Yeomanry

chris@chrisseaton.com or @chrisgseaton on Twitter

Posts47
Comments13,726
View on HN
www.bbc.co.uk 3y ago

KFC apologises after German Kristallnacht promotion

chrisseaton
3pts1
shopify.engineering 4y ago

Shopify invests in research for Ruby at scale

chrisseaton
181pts166
chrisseaton.com 4y ago

Why I'm in the Army Reserve – an explainer for my friends in tech

chrisseaton
485pts577
twitter.com 4y ago

Marines perform boarding exercises with jetpacks and land on a high-speed ship

chrisseaton
1pts0
ruby-compilers.com 4y ago

A History of the Rubinius Ruby JIT

chrisseaton
133pts9
chrisseaton.com 4y ago

The Future Shape of Ruby Objects

chrisseaton
153pts9
shopify.engineering 4y ago

Diggin’ and Fetchin’ with TruffleRuby

chrisseaton
56pts9
shopify.engineering 5y ago

How to Build a Web App with and Without Rails Libraries

chrisseaton
185pts60
www.theguardian.com 5y ago

Streaming platforms aren't helping musicians – and things are only getting worse

chrisseaton
3pts1
chrisseaton.com 5y ago

Ruby's Proposed STM

chrisseaton
293pts100
medium.com 5y ago

I had a brutal PhD viva and 2 years of corrections – here is what I learne

chrisseaton
4pts0
chrisseaton.com 5y ago

Seeing Register Allocation Working in Java

chrisseaton
4pts0
carolchen.me 6y ago

A Deep Introduction to JIT Compilers: JITs are not very Just-in-time

chrisseaton
311pts97
eregon.me 6y ago

The Ruby Spec Suite Compatibility Report

chrisseaton
1pts0
www.bbc.co.uk 6y ago

Amazon's £250k for bookshops fund stuns trade

chrisseaton
2pts0
engineering.mongodb.com 6y ago

Transpiling between any programming languages (2019)

chrisseaton
71pts50
www.bbc.co.uk 6y ago

Nicholas Parsons has died at 96

chrisseaton
2pts0
www.bbc.com 7y ago

San Francisco moves to ban e-cigarettes until health effects known

chrisseaton
1pts0
www.bbc.co.uk 7y ago

Some young people are buying houses with friends

chrisseaton
178pts342
chrisseaton.com 7y ago

Specializing Ropes for Ruby [pdf]

chrisseaton
68pts3
chrisseaton.com 7y ago

Show HN: A side project in medical devices

chrisseaton
267pts45
openjdk.java.net 8y ago

JEP 335: Deprecate the Nashorn JavaScript Engine

chrisseaton
106pts54
medium.com 8y ago

Top Things to Do with GraalVM

chrisseaton
14pts1
zeroturnaround.com 8y ago

Truffle served in a Holy Graal

chrisseaton
2pts0
pragtob.wordpress.com 8y ago

Careful what you measure: 2.1x slower to 4.2x faster – MJIT vs. TruffleRuby

chrisseaton
7pts0
github.com 9y ago

JVM languages without the JVM

chrisseaton
3pts0
marc.info 9y ago

A new JIT for PHP

chrisseaton
2pts0
rubybib.org 9y ago

The Ruby Bibliography

chrisseaton
114pts2
medium.com 10y ago

An obscure research project could radically accelerate innovation in PL design

chrisseaton
3pts0
www.youtube.com 10y ago

Why it's important to optimise the tricky parts of Ruby [video]

chrisseaton
86pts12

The money you pay for tuition really isn't going into a better education, it's maintaining the illusion that draws big names as both students and professors, and all the networking opportunities that then manifest as better outcomes for graduates.

Good professors, students, and networking makes a good education though, so yes it is really going to a better education.

The rest of the civil service seems almost entirely unable to get anything done in computing though. Signals intelligence in the UK and US seem to ship quite a lot of success, from all the history, leaks, and things you can physically see like Bumblehive. Definitely something they’re doing differently than the rest of the civil service.

So the broader question would be: what makes governments apparently unable to get big IT projects done right?

Signals intelligence people must be building some of the most powerful computer systems in the world. They also historically have innovated and led the industry in areas like crypto. How come they get it right but the rest of the civil service can’t?

The proportion nationally is literally over 50%. They can't all be older people - that just doesn't factually add up, does it? You must be living in a very strange bubble, completely unrepresentative of the rest of the country.

The reality is most people with a phone use an iPhone. Any tech or academic conference I go to, most people are using MacBooks.

If like 50% of people use iPhones, which they do, how can it be possible to not know anyone young who uses one? Just doesn’t pass a common sense test to be true.

How does that change if the majority is small or large? Like 1% or 10% what difference do you think that makes?

The only people I know that own iPhones IRL are older people who aren't tech savvy

Where do you live? Overwhelming majority of tech people I know in the US and UK use MacBooks and iPhones. That’s academia, systems programming, web services. Very very rarely see anyone using anything but macOS.

I suspect you support at least some level of collective restriction

Locked mobile phones don’t hurt people other than the people who choose to use them. That’s different to for example a gun.

The only reason to ban iPhones is because you know other people like them as they are and you’re in a minority! You want to enforce a minority opinion on others. That’s morally wrong.

I don't get what's 'in it' for people to have overly complicated forms. Like they have to store all the data and in some cases manually input it (like customs forms.) What's the benefit?

Ideally people would have a single universal identifier and then I'd never need to put my date of birth or tax number on another form again.

offered by inquiry only which i can only assume means we have serious reservations regarding the salability of this 'new' product

Much B2B is done on price by inquiry. The three columns and 'best value!' is a very modern thing. Even in those cases you'll usually see the enterprise option is 'call us'. I wouldn't make extreme assumptions based on the pricing model.