chrisleydon

It's unfair to brand all women like this... just the ones who engage in such activities on Lulu.

Obviously we all want people who are great in bed, look stunning and don't smell, but there's no need to publish this info and make people feel terrible about themselves.

All this bitching goes on in private, perhaps we just ought to leave it that way? Certainly don't need an app for it. Just degrading.

So will I, however it was just a concept ad and I'm still the copyright holder. I make a habit of not selling my copyright when I freelance, or do work for favours, makes more financial sense to license it.

Would be interesting to see someone with a bit of spare time and cash take this to court. I wonder what the ruling would be.

The audio recording I made for Luluvise a few months ago for a video animation is pretty amusing too: - http://soundcloud.com/chrisleydon/luluvise-animation-audio

Makes you wonder if a service this shallow could ever take off.

Thanks guys! It's only a version one document at the moment so we can update it with your feedback in the next version.

That's true for certain feature requests, but we're targeting support problems with this particular sheet. It's best not to assume that the customer is 'stupid' and instead see them on the same level as them, it's all about a mindset. If you go in with the customer is always wrong you won't go that extra step to try and help them, more dismiss them.

I can understand where you're coming from. From a support mentality they have to be viewed as being right, although admittedly there are some customers that are probably worth losing in the long run.

The idea behind that point was more to push the team to get things right and go that extra mile to help the customer. If they're rude though then the rule doesn't apply.

Thoroughly enjoyed the first event!

Really impressed with the new design and tools provided by Version 4. Just keeps getting better and better!

Not a problem! Sorry it took so damn long. Next time we aim to have them shot in HD and a faster pull through. A budget would be a nice incentive ;)

Apologies, I'll pass on your feedback to the site's designer. Ir's in need of an overhaul anyway.

I look forward to hopefully knowing what you've discovered! It'll be an interesting study, I'm sure, and I'm intrigued as to how it goes. Best of luck with it!

There are still calls for one and in the West Midlands the police have started to limit data connectivity in an attempt to quash the "BBM effect".

These are the disenfranchised youth who are just angry and have no agenda. They don't care for a system, or a society, that's given up on them. In many respects their just violent for the sake of it - This AudioBoo highlights it well: http://bit.ly/nNhFOq

I think you missed the point. The article is highlighting the increasing inevitability that OS X will become a closed system where you will only be able to install apps and add ons through the Mac App Store.

It was an early and foolish decision we made back in the dearly days of TinyGrab. The original system wasn't built, or even created, to handle more than a handful of people using the service. Thanks to some great PR though we scaled to ver 400,000+ users almost over night. The code base was horrible, buggy and 2.0 was being written to fix all of that. It was supposed to be a smooth transition over, but unfortunately someone got there first and forced us to launch the new system.

If you can shoot me an email, chris@tinygrab.com, I'll deal with your account and help get you set back up again.

A good alternative you'll find is FileShuttle. - http://getfileshuttle.com

We have more backups than you can shake a stick at. The issues lays with the server being compromised and being forced to shut down. The old API and apps relied on a fixed IP address. It would have taken us months to get TinyGrab v1 back up to scratch, or a few weeks to perfect 2.0. No data was lost, what would you choose?

Chris Leydon TinyGrab Founder and Project Manager chris@tinygrab.com