chrisjj

Your body and mind need a good diet. Make your own food

Stopped reading here. I know plenty of people who would not be made happy by that. They'd be made ill.

Why would we use a multi-billion parameter model to copy text?

Because it is free and essy to use? The number of numbers under the hood is irrelevent.

More like an Israeli arms manufacturer test-bombing a Gazan primary school. They know their audience.

Why should OpenAI (or any frontier lab) be building these systems if they can't get a secure environment / containment right?

Simple. No responsible and competent person would want the job.

we let such foolishly inconsistent people make such grand choices for everyone poorly.

Who could you get to work on this inherently bullsh*t tech, but inherent bullsh*tters?

Our intentionally broad safeguards deliver more capabilities

Oh? How, exactly?

Why should OpenAI (or any frontier lab) be building these systems if they can't get a secure environment / containment right?

The can, because they've lowered expectations to a level even they can meet.

They should get paid by the LMM only.

Computers have been superhuman at playing chess for decades now.

And at doing arithmetic for even longer /i

The methodology

No. That's the method.

Absolutely useless, since the buttons for the monitor are right there on the bottom of it

... and so out of arm's reach, right?

that's supposed to be reputable enough to get their driver signed by MS and pass validation. LG breached that trust here.

I think you overestimated how reputable is enough.

So how is this malware?

Your OS installs malware

Malware??

The answer according to way too many SO mods is that a question should primarily be to contribute to the SO knowledge base. Asking simply to get an answer is selfish.

I wish SO had not been killed by chatbots, because I was looking forward to seeing it die by the gamified hands of its mob of mods.

And me (UK).

where did we go on vacation last year?

...hoping it is not on Tommy's instagram?

E-- != E

But kid knows not to give password to a caller.

They might not believe it - for good reason.

... the hardest for its victims to be believed about — because the evidence, by design, sounds exactly like someone they love.

Uh? Surely this makes believing the victims easy not hard to believe.

Its like revenge porn. "It's not me. It's a deepfake" is easy to believe.

Unknown senders solve a CAPTCHA or pay a fee to get in. Trusted contacts get through as usual.

Somehow I doubt this determines whether a contact is trusted.

We define values as normative considerations, such as honesty or caution, that are stated or demonstrated in Claude’s responses.

Meaning honesty not stated/demonstrated by Claude is not a value.

Your slip is showing, Dario.

Social media, as we have it today, is not healthy for anybody.

Millions of employed might disagree.

a four-minute long documentary masterclass in bystander action, documenting offenses

I read the whole article to find these offences.

Found none.

Not to start an argument but in lamence terms, renaming history to "New Tab" is as close to wiping history as a website can manage.

"I did my best" is no excuse for this critical failure to deliver as advertised.

This fail is a horrifying abuse facilitator.

"...though they will be able to opt out of it by changing their account settings."

I'm pretty sure it originated from a 100% AI-generated essay

There's no such thing. You're probably thinking of a 100% "AI"-/regurgitated/ essay.

"Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), a system that exhibits all the cognitive capabilities the brain has, is probably only a few short years away"

Demis, there's a reason its not called Artificial General Cognition.

I'm pretty sure it originated from a 100% AI-generated essay

There's no such thing. You're probably thinking of "AI"-regurgitated essay.