HN user

choilive

734 karma
Posts0
Comments302
View on HN
No posts found.

Anyone have any idea what the architecture/vendors they are using for inference/compute?

Getting the compute to run inference for multi-trillion parameter models at any sort of scale and performance is daunting. There are a handful of vendors that have systems that can do this (~ Nvidia NVl-72 class) that pretty much only the frontier labs and hyperscalers effectively have access to.

That statement means nothing. You could say the exact same thing about Rails and have an equally defensible position. What about its architecture makes it better?

Apple was on the USB Implementers Forum that designed USB-C so.. I would say they could definitely be credited as a co-inventor of USB-C, they also introduced one of the first devices that used USB-C.

The Ballad of TIGIT 2 months ago

Everything is obvious in hindsight, but the data (and theory) at the time was that this had a really good shot at being the next big thing in a world where >90% of drugs never make it past clinical trials. 10% probability of success * $200B in lifetime sales (assuming a Keytruda level smash hit) means an EV of ~$20B or more. Not a surprise more than a few companies wanted a shot at it.

Soooo.. not to sound like a luddite but to me the best dedicated writing device for me has been just pen and a notebook or a typewriter.

There are surprisingly many "portable" typewriter options out there (including electronic ones).

How so? Most of these companies will take a hit but will be fine Alphabet, Amazon, Google, etc can write off their entire investments in AI and will be a-OK. The pure AI companies will obviously be dead.

They run a decent amount of their own compute/bare metal server for customer workloads. But likely still had some critical dependencies on GCP.

Absolutely dumb take. There are plenty of very bright and talented people that would have made excellent teachers but chose different career paths because - surprise surprise - the pay is better.

Starship V3 2 months ago

Yep, the COP goes down as the temperature goes up, and at a certain point it's not worthwhile increasing the temperature.

Starship V3 2 months ago

Stefan-Boltzmann law means radiative heat transfer in space is approx. to the 4th power of the hot side of your radiator. Typical space based radiators operate around 350K. If you can increase the hot side of the refrigeration cycle by 4x (1400K) you increase heat transfer by 256x. Create a radiator design that can operate at this temp (multi-stage Brayton loops, heat pumps, possible liquid metal final stage) with a large enough surface area and now a datacenter in space seems possible.

It's a difficult engineering challenge but physically possible, and Elon is no stranger to engineering challenges.

Some numbers: assume an emissivity of 0.85, assume no absorption from the sun, assume heat rejected from both sides of a panel, a 1m^2 panel will reject 1.45kW/m^2 @ 350K.

At 900K its 62 kW/m^2. Not a trivial amount of heat.

Well.. farming equipment are high 6 figures 7 pieces of business equipment (the lifetime operating costs are definitely in the 7 figures.) These are owned and operated by people who I would expect to do this type of research and critical thinking. These aren't normie consumers buying everyday appliances or electronics.

However.. farmers are a weird bunch and they are blinded by brand loyalty or will only buy from an "American" company which ironically allowed JD to stomp all over them because of their dominant market position.

I speculate that they are hitting the reticle limit for models not much bigger than this. Judging by the size of the chip in their demonstrator for a 8B model I'm sure they know this already.

To scale this up means splitting up large models into multiple chips (layer or tensor parallelism). And that gets quite complicated quite quickly and you'll need really high bandwdith/low latency interconnects.

Still a REALLY interesting approach with a ton of potential despite the unstated challenges.