This seems ripe for a joke akin to "how was the food?" "bad, but at least the portions were big!"
Like, "how was the medical advice" "worse than a doc's, but at least it was cheaper!"
HN user
Ph.D. student in informatics, with interests in cognition, machine learning, and curiosity.
Curious about philosophy, art, ethics, consciousness, AI, mathematics, and the future.
This seems ripe for a joke akin to "how was the food?" "bad, but at least the portions were big!"
Like, "how was the medical advice" "worse than a doc's, but at least it was cheaper!"
One statue of liberty (Liberty Enlightening the World, Liberty Island, NYC) is approximately 4 times the size of one statue of liberty (Liberty Enlightening the World replica, Île aux Cygnes, Paris).
Easy peasy.
I am sympathetic to your analogy. I think it works well enough.
But it falls a bit short in that encyclopedias, lossy or not, shouldn't affirmatively contain false information. The way I would picture a lossy encyclopedia is that it can misdirect by omission, but it would not change A to ¬A.
Maybe a truthy-roulette enclyclopedia?
I am not sure I would rely on observations of gyms and beaches for whether people are healthier for fear of selection bias. Going to the beach and seeing mostly fit bathers is like going to the hospital and seeing mostly sick people and thinking that can be generalized to society.
Why would you ask old people if young people are healthier than they were? Surely, Spain compiles medical statistics.
Anyway, Spain appears to have the same weight issues as everywhere else:
I send texts via voice command/dictation all the time. How would this be distinguished?
Isn't a solution to assign vicarious liability to whomever approves the use of the decision-making machine?
Humans do like to fuck.
NB: "the only one that does[n't] make my finger pads feel sore is the macbook"
This is seriously the thing I like the most about my 2017 and 2023 macbooks. The trackpad feels so good. Every other manufacturer that I have tried, and no it is not all of them but a lot, they all make my fingers feel bad after using them. I don't know if they are rougher or textured somehow? The only one that does make my finger pads feel sore is the macbook.
Surely the hopes for Pope Pizzaballa is in part because of his name?
I would pay $500bn to get siri to distinguish between a 13 minute timer and a 30 minute timer.
This is what I do. I cannot call it Twitter anymore because that makes me sad (I miss you Twitter 2008-2016). I cannot call it X because that is dumb. So Xitter it is.
That is an interesting question: do people generally care about the survival of the species?
I am not actually sure I wouldn't take the bet against you there. Given what I perceive about how little people care about wars that they think do not affect them, poverty, hunger, climate change, corruption, sustainability, etc ... I don't know.
I believe 95% of people would say they care about humanity's survival, sure, but the proof would be in action. How many people would actually do something about it? How many people would even merely inconvenience themselves if it meant the survival of someone other than themselves? I am not that confident about how many people that would be.
I do not usually think of myself as a pessimistic or nihilistic person, but this has me wondering even now whether I care about the long-term survival of the species. Like, really long term. Do I care if humans are around 10,000 years from now? 500? That is an interesting question. I will have to think about it.
Why is Musk attacking these things in the EU? Why does he care what we do?
That is not at all what that says...
I try, too. It is less and less possible every day.
What are the financial reasons for governments to want mass surveillance? I can understand some other reasons, which I think are illegitimate, but I cannot think of a financial reason.
At any rate, governments are all made of people who are also tracked at all times. Just because some parts of government would like mass surveillance, why would legislators who can do something about it be okay with having their car be constantly monitored by private parties or the police or anyone?
Why would legislators, donors, and lobbyists be okay with their own location data (and in some extreme cases like with Nissan their "sexual behaviors" etc) being sold to data brokers, for example?
I have a really hard time understanding why we as a society (or various societies) are okay these kinds of things.
Sure, I understand that there is little I can do about it, but why are powerful people okay with their car company or phone company knowing everything about them?
Are people in California and the EU at least covered by data privacy laws?
I have been meaning to try it. Is it best to get a new phone, or will any old model work fine?
But it is trivial to allow js per website using ublock. My default is no-js, and if there is some website I really want to use that requires js, then I enable it. If I find myself using that website regularly, then I make the permission permanent. It is literally zero burden.
I am not some no-js evangelist or javascript hater or anything, but a huge amount of the web really does work fine (sometimes better even!) without js enabled by default. I don't think it has to be strictly either-or.
Thank you for that. I really enjoyed it. It resonates with me. I have lived in three different countries, and in my two non-native countries, I have enjoyed my life much more. I think part of it is that there I have been somewhat oblivious to the news and current politics of the new places I have lived. I get some of news and politics from my friends, but I do not follow it like I used to in my country of origin. I have also dramatically reduced my news consumption in my native country, because I am not there very often, and it does not preoccupy me so much anymore. Though I have not given up the news entirely, either in my home country or in my adopted countries, but less is, I feel, much better.
I understand, fully and deeply, why news and current events are important, but they are also a cancer. At least in the way that they are sold to us. I also get a sense that the negative effect that the news has our mental health is quite widespread around the world. As in, it is not unique to America or Britain or European countries, etc.
Looking back on some of the comments from this thread^, especially those claiming that TSMC building a factory in the US was infeasible/impossible, was entertaining in light of the current thread.
There was no art, poetry, craftsmanship, skill, talent, fame, friendship (or relationships of any kind), flavor, joy, celebration, or creativity before the Industrial Revolution. Gotcha.
I have been a long-time iPhone user, but my daily driver is Linux. Once, a long time ago, I had high hopes for a Linux phone.
TFA mentions Lineage and Graphene. Are these the only realistic alternatives these days? Why would one choose one over the other?
I think the ergonomics is an underappreciated aspect of adoption and regular usage.
There’s definitely a point where headsets are going to be comfortable enough you can forget they’re there
I would really like to think so, but I am not at all confident that this is will happen.
I understand not wanting to. I have been compiling my own kernels since about 2008, I think. I have occasionally thought about switching to something else, but really it has only gotten better (faster) over time.
When I was young and spry, I used to compile them with every new minor revision. Now, it is just maybe a couple times per year. I think that cooling it on how often I do it has helped it not become annoying.
I agree, because I suspect that it would not be different from us in general (differences in details of course, which would be the interesting part)!
*peddle
Brand safety. They just make it seem like safety for someone else, but it is brand safety.
What would any company as "the long term AI winner" look like? What would it mean to be the winner in this context?