HN user

chatterhead

423 karma
Posts11
Comments289
View on HN

Our bodies are formed by waves in all ways; even those of natural survival are formed by waves - our bodies respond like plants to light we just don't think of ourselves as photosynthetic in that way. The human eye is the greatest overall seeing object on the planet and it is 100% formed by wave information.

Consciousness is a wave. There is no soul. Matter is metaphor there is no difference only how we perceive solidity; which is simply scale.

Europe is an ethnocentric battleground that has exported Irish Unions, British Racism, Jewish Banking, Italian Mafias, Russian Dystopianism, French Elitism and German... well, Germany, to the rest of the world. At various times these groups have worked together, not unlike American Suffragettes and Teetotalers or Abolitionists and Federalists, to advance their own agendas. Russia, after the fall of the Berlin wall, needed technology and access to foreign markets in S. America and Africa so they joined political forces with the elite of these European networks to do just that.

A new Global Oligarchy began to emerge and they have relied on the techniques Russia used to depress and subjugate it's vassal states to the peoples of Europe and America for the purpose of creating the confusion and paranoia necessary to short-circuit civil action against the consolidation of power and wealth within those countries by their elite. Primarily done through media and manufactured conflict.

I didn't read the whole thing because the answer is simple.

The fall of the Berlin Wall was not the end of the Cold War and the paranoia, distrust and apathy you sense now are the culminations of Russia's Eastern German techniques to the West.

We have been in an almost entirely psychological war since 1991. The decline of the West was primarily due to the fact we had a high trust society that foreigners from Europe took advantage of in order to utilize their Old World schemes.

Sounds like a strategic way for Google to exit a business they aren't making much money on without spooking investors with fresh revenue concerns as AI ramps up as a potential replacement.

Not that it will. I'll die before I let AI be used for advertising.

This is a first world manipulation into some kind of contrived "workers unite" hit piece.

This has nothing to do with real AI and instead this author is trying to pass off hacks and gapfills as an entire industry or pursuit for the purpose of manufacturing suffering or abuse that isn't there.

This author has a terrible perspective.

If we have to enslave the whole world for 1 year to build an AI that elevates all for eternity. Would you do it?

Impossible? Maybe. Necessary? Absolutely. Tipping was originally a way to get your food before everyone else. It's not an economic business model.

Raise prices and be transparent with pricing - which is difficult with tipping since most people are bad at math and don't take out a calculator to see what $127 meal will really cost.

Tipping is a service tax and becoming an entitlement to a generation of workers who have never and likely will never have to really work.

No. Tipping is going away. Learn how to pay your employees properly.

The only way I'd ever pay for chatgpt or use it for real is if all communication with it was encrypted from the start. For the kind of sensitive information going back and forth for the kind of real world projects these technologies will be used for it makes sense for ChatGPT to encrypt it all even from itself.

What happens with counseling CGPTs? If someone tells a chatbot therapist they cheated on their husband and that data leaks who pays for it?

Yes. He's using the perception of impulsivity to his advantage. How these people think he's that dumb is beyond me. They apparently are very prone to groupthink and should be exited.

Edit: I'm posting to fast (1 post per hour is too fast) so here is my response to Milo.

Not everything associated with someone you don't like has to have parallels to Donald Trump.

Here are the facts:

1) Twitter needs help

2) Everyone in the world knows it

3) Elon has billions to pay top tier workers

4) Resignations with pay prevent disgruntled sabotage

5) Tech layoffs rumbling across the industry

6) Twitter is about to have their pick of the litter

7) While former Twits are going to actually have to compete

Somehow this puts Elon in a bad position?

Ok, how about Howard Stern? People who hated Stern were most likely to listen to him. He had people masturbate on his show, curse, yell racist remarks...etc. Everything people expect Twitter to become and fail from yet Stern (30 years ago) made his bones off such behavior.

The difference today is that advertisers don't apparently have to make money they just have to do what Blackrock tells them. That seems to be the difference.

And as the first paragraph of "What It's Like" discusses, it seems like ADHD is just laziness. It's not.

I wasn't. Even if it seemed that way. See why I made the comment the way I made it? Doesn't matter.

Effective Altruism is bullshit and here is why; because, the invisible hand has already shown itself to be a far better lever of human good through the acceptance of human nature. "Helping people" implies you know what people need. It's a power position to begin with and thus designed to fulfill the doers goals of doing good not the receivers 'need' of being helped.

Each of us, individually, pursuing our own self-interests produce value to society and others as a whole. Whether through producing products, offering services, performing labor, or consuming goods, we all seek our own interests to the betterment of the whole.

EA is just a new sort of chivalry for a new wannabe class of Nobles. That's it.

Lawyers and our legal system have become a social net-negative. The profession, by design, seeks to constrain activity for the benefit (hindsight protection) of a few. The truth is that many 'landmark' cases are completely manufactured and bench hunted. AI judgments will likely be no different.

The most important AI for our future is going to be the legal AI that allows people free defense from corporate bullies and trolls. Unfortunately, this kind of tech will likely be bought by Westlaw or LexisNexis and simply used to supplement current practice instead of revolutionize representation.

Whoa, that's crazy. Why wouldn't they just build a cart to tow it all with? There had to be some level of pride in how much you could carry or how far you made deliveries.

The risk involved in losing an order, or dozens it would seem, all at once back then had to outweigh the benefit of delivery in this method - unless these guys were so good they never dropped it.