HN user

chadpaulson

41 karma

https://chadpaulson.com

Posts9
Comments41
View on HN

Yeah, I agree after thinking about it. Connecting other social networks makes it difficult to distinguish Friendster as an intimate and honest platform free of spam.

The intimacy levels can be IRL (when you tap phones), Phone (when you friend via phone number) and Email (when you friend via email address). You could also measure the intimacy hierarchy / rank by keeping track of events (should events become a feature) you attend with other friends.

I agree. There should be a hierarchy of intimacy, as it were, in order to initiate a friendship.

* Tapping Phones * Confirming Phone Number * Confirming Email * Connected via Other Platforms (Facebook, Twitter, BlueSky, etc)

As far as maintaining a friendship by tapping phones, again, I would make the friendships a constant and graph / rank intimacy by how often you tap phones as well as how connected you are to your friend (phone, email, connections on other networks).

The market forces (the Jack Dorseys of the world) have made the decision for us. I have since attempted to embrace automatic programming / vibe coding and have seen interesting results. AI is a tool and we are living through the infancy of its evolution. I have concerns, not counting the current DoW drama with Anthropic and OpenAI. The next 5 years will significantly shape the direction of AI and how it is implemented in our workflows and every day lives. I'd rather involve myself and help shape its future instead of pretending it doesn't exist because I don't want to deal with it.

The Python user base is perfectly fine. Of course, any additional package installed outside of Django and Wagtail can introduce security risks. Since Wagtail and all of its additional packages incorporates Django's security features, which includes protection against many common attack methods, it is a more secure offering.

https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.2/topics/security/

Not to mention security through obscurity, Wagtail is a lot less common than Wordpress. Therefore, not as many attack vectors exist for Wagtail as they do for Django / Wagtail, especially if you keep on top of the security patches.

https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/sep/04/security-re...

I have used both Django-CMS and Wagtail. Wagtail is much more user-friendly and extensible. You can create Wikis, Blogs and regular content pages with models and maintain it all through a friendly CMS interface that rivals Wordpress.

Django has a CMS called Wagtail, which has some really nice features including custom content blocks which allow you to easily create unique looking pages.

Wagtail has over 15,000 stars on GitHub, is heavily supported and was created in 2014. It has since been adopted by organizations such as NASA, Google, and the National Health Service.

Below is a comparison between Wagtail and Wordpress.

https://wagtail.org/wagtail-vs-wordpress/

From the Logojoy How it Works page.

    The last step isn’t actually AI – it’s a genetic algorithm. As you ‘favorite’ logos, we apply a natural selection type process to generate more accurate logos as you scroll. Each logo is made up of hundreds of ingredients (ie ‘funky font’, ‘bold color’, ‘logo has a symbol’, etc.) – these are called traits in the context of genetic algorithms.
As others in the thread have already mentioned, the AI referenced in the previous steps seems more like a rules-based algorithm.