HN user

cavedave

895 karma
Posts49
Comments21
View on HN
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.com 4y ago

A Kaggle for Materials?

cavedave
2pts1
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.ie 12y ago

Making US County maps with Python

cavedave
1pts0
www.fairandsquare.ie 12y ago

Start Up Judo

cavedave
1pts0
www.fairandsquare.ie 12y ago

Can you split equity with the Shapley value?

cavedave
1pts1
www.fairandsquare.ie 13y ago

Show HN: My app for envy free rent division

cavedave
1pts1
www.fairandsquare.ie 13y ago

The Infovore Startup

cavedave
1pts0
www.fairandsquare.ie 13y ago

Blood Banker, my blood donation game

cavedave
1pts0
www.fairandsquare.ie 13y ago

Less Work for All

cavedave
1pts1
fairandsquare.ie 13y ago

Show HN: My tool to divide up tasks so everyone does less work

cavedave
1pts3
54.228.192.228 13y ago

Designing games that all can win, or how I accidentally became a game programmer

cavedave
2pts0
fairandsquare.ie 13y ago

Show HN: My tool to divide up stuff between two people

cavedave
3pts1
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.ie 13y ago

The set partition problem and drawing the Presidential election

cavedave
1pts0
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.ie 13y ago

Becoming President with 22% of the Votes

cavedave
2pts0
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.ie 13y ago

The Loom of Language

cavedave
1pts0
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.ie 13y ago

Memorise a Pack of Cards

cavedave
1pts0
blog.chess.com 14y ago

Is 3600 Elo the Max?

cavedave
2pts0
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.ie 14y ago

The Fairest Way to Pick a Team

cavedave
2pts0
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.ie 14y ago

Baby's First Hack

cavedave
1pts0
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.com 14y ago

The Birthday Problem

cavedave
1pts0
www.softwarepreservation.org 14y ago

FORTRAN should virtually eliminate coding and debugging

cavedave
62pts24
code.google.com 14y ago

Portable Executable 101 - a windows executable walkthrough

cavedave
2pts0
groups.google.com 14y ago

Referer in HTTP protocol is the most common misspelling ever

cavedave
1pts0
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.com 14y ago

Awful Security Questions

cavedave
1pts0
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.com 14y ago

EULA Be Sorry

cavedave
2pts0
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.com 14y ago

Give Yourself Synaesthesia with Greasemonkey

cavedave
2pts0
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.com 14y ago

The Irish Religion of Copying that Saved Civilisation

cavedave
1pts0
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.com 14y ago

The number of people working in agriculture and industry has peaked

cavedave
1pts0
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.com 14y ago

How much would a driverless taxi cost?

cavedave
3pts0
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.com 14y ago

Should Science Bloggers Have a Session?

cavedave
1pts0
liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.com 14y ago

Lithium in the water supply

cavedave
1pts0

This is an idea I had for ages. But no one seems to have made it yet. So I am probably missing something.

If you can point out why this wouldn't work. Or what materials/quality it would work well on I would appreciate it.

Less Work for All 13 years ago

This is my app. It is just a toy at the moment but if anyone has a problem it is near fixing let me know and I can turn it into something useful

Fair point. I will write up a proper description.

The main site is about dividing up goods. Lawyers do it and might pay for it.

This app is about dividing up bads (tasks). It was meant to be a toy but something about the problem is sticking in my craw as something more serious.

I have to put in documentation and a good explanation. But I just wanted to see if any managers thought the tool might be useful.

The problem it is trying to solve is to minimise the amount of work people think they are doing by allocating jobs to people who want them most.

All the jobs would be 100% of the work. Each employee puts in what % of the total each job would be for them. The system optimizes so that each employee has the same perceived effort and that perceived effort is minimized. There are some obvious UX fixes that need to be made but I would be interested to hear what you think of the problem/solution idea?

>This was a fairly large change that we, understandably, only wanted to deploy to a small subset of users. This was facilitated by Bengineer Kamen's GAE/Bingo split-testing framework for App Engine.

I think this method of A/B testing has some faults. I blogged about it A/B testing. Is Khan doing it wrong?http://liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.com/2011/09/ab-testing-...

and Allen Downey ran some simulations at Repeated tests: how bad can it be?http://allendowney.blogspot.com/2011/10/repeated-tests-how-b...

"Averaged over 30 years, the trend is for an annual 7 percent reduction in the dollars per watt of solar photovoltaic cells. While in the earlier part of this decade prices flattened for a few years, the sharp decline" http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2011/03/16/sm...

'The cost of solar, in the average location in the U.S., will cross the current average retail electricity price of 12 cents per kilowatt hour in around 2020, or 9 years from now. In fact, given that retail electricity prices are currently rising by a few percent per year, prices will probably cross earlier, around 2018 for the country as a whole, and as early as 2015 for the sunniest parts of America.'

If solar is at a 7% annual decline is that not a very rapid advancement?

I do not think you can just stop the test when you find something you think is significant

http://www.evanmiller.org/how-not-to-run-an-ab-test.html 'If instead of deciding ahead of time, “this experiment will collect exactly 1,000 observations,” you say, “we’ll run it until we see a significant difference,” all the reported significance levels become meaningless. '

Reading the stats.py it looks like you might be doing this.

How to hide Ryanair 15 years ago

well a google of "cheap flight dublin london" Ryanair comes up third. Which implies they must get a fair amount of traffic from search engines

[dead] 16 years ago

I am pretty sure this isn't him. It is still funny though

[dead] 16 years ago

Sorry I am new to the site. And I am just realising this is not appropriate. Still "What do his leavings tell us?"

"The authors also compare the experiences of separate Pacific islands with eight different colonizers: the United States, Britain, Spain, the Netherlands, Portugal, Japan, Germany, and France.* Their verdict is that the islands that are best off, in terms of income growth, are the ones that were colonized by the United States—as in Guam and Puerto Rico. Next best is time spent as a Dutch, British, or French colony. At the bottom are the countries colonized by the Spanish and especially the Portuguese." http://www.slate.com/id/2151852