bux93

I'm not being pedantic, I'm saying their word salad is hard to read. As demonstrated by half of the messages in here arguing about what actually happened and whether the headline is correct.

It's not hard to say "We will not launch new models of OnePlus phones in Europe and NA. Current models will remain on sale, will still be supported and your warrantee is unchanged."

A pedant might say that telling people to use simpler words is the opposite of being "ostentatiously scholarly".

As part of the proactive global strategy adjustment, OnePlus has decided to conclude new product rollouts in Europe and North America.

So.. they will roll out new products, conclusively? They will sell the same new products globally, including in Europe and North America? They will.. stop selling new phones because they can't form an intelligible sentence? That's the one.

That's the Hayes command set[1]. Hayes was a registered trademark up until 2022[2].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayes_AT_command_set [2] https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/search/search-results/73319703

In the author's mind, it's unexpected/amazing that 'for' can iterate over many types. But it's NOT unexpected/amazing that 'iter' can iterate over many types. I have no idea why.

It's not like 'for' is limited to counting in other languages. The grand-daddy in c does something until some condition is false, and that thing can equally be incrementing/decrementing a number or invoking some function. That's what a loop does in any case, it compiles down to a conditional jump (JNE/JE..)

Maybe his reason for astonishment is obscured by over-use of an LLM to 'enhance' the text.

And teams. And new outlook. And powertoys. Onedrive. SQL Server. The Microsoft store. Winget. I'm also not confident Windows Update actually does update Office, which also retains its own update mechanism.

If you design processes to be open by design, the cost of extracting data (removing sensitive data that is indeed not needed) goes down radically. Governments know this and resist it.

IBM CUA (1987) should be required reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Common_User_Access

For most people, it is part of the OS though. Windows comes with Client and Server services activated by default even on the Home edition for some reason. The functionality is dumbed down and hidden though, while onedrive - which requires registering a windows account - is shoved in the user's face.

Well, the dB scale was once created on the basis that 1dB was thought to be the "just noticeable difference". Off the top of my head, I think trained listeners can actually notice differences of 0.3 dB, though this sort of thing is going to be frequency dependent too.

The eq-adjustments you'll find online often have adjustments ranging from 1 to 6dB in different frequencies. That's enough to notice.

Comparing settings/devices, it's very easy to notice. Just play some music on your laptop/phone speakers and move the device around a bit, and you'll hear striking differences in highs and lows.

However in isolation, I think most people wouldn't be able to say if a particular sound source is "good" or "bad". It takes a while for you to clock that, no, it's not the teams/zoom call that has bad quality, it's your headset that's dropping mids.

djbdns/tinydns can schedule a change and give out a lower and lower TTL the nearer the changeover time gets - a quick search doesn't show any newer implementations but this is surely a good way to do it.

It's to create an in-group, and you are in the out-group.

My car has wired carplay/android auto, but I have a nifty little USB dongle that receives carplay/android auto wirelessly and passes it to the car via USB. Sometimes called an AI box, I think.

These things contain a whole System-on-a-Chip board. I presume what it's acting like a middle box; pretending to be the headunit to the phone, and then sending the phone's output to the headunit, pretending to be a phone.

Since they need a quite beefy CPU to do that, I'm guessing they don't just pass along packets, but actually speak the protocol on both ends, and perhaps transcode the a/v stream.

That's in fact one of the pros of carplay/android auto as opposed to just putting your phone in one of those windscreen attached holders; you get to use the volume buttons on the steering wheel. Annoyingly my car doesn't have play/pause buttons on there, but if it had, they would work.

Agreed. Their privacy page even says they'll remove data if you withdraw consent, but they don't ask for consent. They also don't mention any you could object to data processing, claiming that "Processing is necessary to perform a contract with the data subject and to take steps toward the conclusion of a business relationship." which is a very contorted interpretation; taking steps towards the conclusion is about making quotes and such. It makes me sour on their claims "Keep your data private, compliant, and fully in the EU. As a privacy-first European company, we help you stay aligned with GDPR. No surprises. Full transparency."

Linux is only used as a kernel temporarily until GNU is finished.

This comparison to qemu gives some idea: https://www.unicorn-engine.org/docs/beyond_qemu.html

The ability to execute and inspect some code without any context (no OS, not even a complete binary) is useful for reverse/security engineering.

The parable-replication crisis is real though

If you book Ryanair, and your concentration slips up for a second, you WILL make a mistake and it WILL cost you money and/or inconvenience you. Then you might complain about that, and be met with smarmy, smug, smarter-than-you people who insist that they fly with Ryanair all the time and never pay too much, people who can't read shouldn't be allowed to book flights, etc. etc.

It's worth avoiding Ryanair just to avoid that scenario.

I have fond memories of the, I think 1995, Compton's Interactive Encyclopedia. I think it was given away with new computers, like Encarta and Grolier's. I think I did buy the Compton's CD, but at a huge discount, since I bought it grey market (not bundled with a PC, but from a PC retailer).

Flexi discs were cool inserts for some home computer magazines; you'd dub the flexi disc to music cassette, and the noise and beeps were computer programs for your home computer.

Do you see "personal" and something that looks like your name in the path? That's your personal onedrive, like your home directory on a unix system.

See "sites" in the URL? That's a sharepoint site (AKA teams "shared" folder).

The former disappears (after a year) when the user license is removed. The latter is not associated with an individual user, so even if everyone in a team leaves the company it isn't just automatically removed.

Following was wrong and had been edited: The non-business personal onedrive was a box.com/dropbox/g-drive competitor. Microsoft moved its backend to Sharepoint at some time. (Onedrive for business used Sharepoint from the get-go). The integration of the personal drive, even though it's a descendent from the 'for business' product, is still quite unintuitive in my opinion.

Not great for t-shirts

That he backed PQ crypto that turned out to be broken later should be an argument in favor of hybrid (belts-and-suspender) schemes rather than against it. Embarassing behavior amounts to not much more than ad hominems. Hybrid KEMs are a good idea.

Only if you ignore almost every input and output that neurons have.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/ai-is-nothing-like-a-brain-an... https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9665914/

This is why making more neuromorphic NNs is still an active area of research, although they typically all focus on another extremely simplified model (spiking neural networks).

Do toilet breaks count towards the 30 minutes?

In "peeking under the hood", it says quite honestly "SLAX is purely syntactic sugar."

I think that the XML syntax of XSLT itself was only one barrier for people to adopt XSLT, even in the XML heydays.

The main obstacles appear to me that the execution model is hard for people to graps; you need to think both as a parser (apply-templates/) and in a more declarative style at the same time. The XSLT can be in a completely different order to the document and in fact it can visit nodes in the document multiple times, hopping through nodes in a different order each time, with lovely constructs like apply-template with "mode" and "select" mixed with call-template by "name", plus you get to use xpath and for-each to boot. The control flow changes from the order in the input, to some predefined order, and back depending on when you decide to match(-template) or for-each. There's a lot going on at the same time! Fun times!

Wero is super confusing. They're in the business of acquiring different methods (I don't even know if they always buy them outright or if they merge or they are just associated in some way), branding them ALL wero, and announcing that every payment in every channel will be rolled out SOON via wero, without ever offering specifics.

So in The Netherlands wero is the new name of eCommerce payments, but in another country the new name for peer2peer. But no idea when p2p will launch in the Netherlands or when eCommerce will launch elsewhere. And if the existing services will be degraded when they are internationalized or merged.

The merchant typically uses stripe or adyen or whatever (mollie has a cute name!), a payment service provider or PSP.

The PSP looks at what methods the merchant wants to accept, which methods the user could potentially be using (based on e.g. country by geo IP or some delivery location) and show the relevant icons.

EU users will see schemes like wero or Przelewy24, Japanese customers will see 'konbini' among the icons, and US users may only see credit cards, Apple Pay and Affirm. There are TONS of payment services. Stripe lists 123 of them.

The merchant will want to exclude methods that have high costs (for themselves), maybe they also care about their customers not getting into debt (so no buy-now-pay-later or credit), and some payment methods have higher rates of disputes/chargebacks (e.g. Amex).

In general, most merchants will want to offer as many methods as possible to prevent consumers who have a preference (this week) for using account A over account B from bouncing.

I'm seeing more of a gradual path.

Chrome 124 (april 24) introduced hybrid post-quantum TLS, and Chrome 131 (nov 24) switched to a hybrid using ML-KEM, which was standardized in 2024, just after Firefox 132 (oktober 2024), while openssh introduced a hybrid scheme in release 9.0 (April 2022) and made ML-KEM+25519 default in OpenSSH 10.0 (April 2025).

Hybrid PQ schemes being adopted in other places is people playing catch-up, not the avant garde.

I'd say digital signatures should be the foremost concern, those may need to provide non-repudiation for decades.

The article states

By feeding legacy PRG (circa 1985) and logics to models like Claude, ChatGPT, developers can now instruct the AI to translate decades-old dBase PRG directly into memory-safe Rust, highly concurrent Go, or modern Dart/Flutter cross-platform applications.

And it alludes to this early on, but it doesn't show any examples.