bun_terminator

this isn't really about gangs

clickbait, don't hide the truth in a pseudo-riddle

Sir, a second scrollbar just hit the towers

I have never heard anything else but S-Q-L, in multiple workplaces. What I was new to databases I started with the history lesson, but was quickly corrected to pronounce it S-Q-L.

I don't even know anymore, nor does anyone else I think

say no to manipulated scrollbars

some of the established practice on generating SDFs from masks is incorrect

SDFs are for some reason riddled with false beliefs. Earlier this year it drove me nuts to learn that boolean operations for SDFs are not correct

The little it says about what this even is seems to be wrong. This is not cross-platform at all

Reddit administrators have now removed your comment as well.

yes of course they have, they banned my entire account. Because that's what reddit does. See my points above

I genuinely don't think the word I used is comparable to asshole

Can't you see how extremist this viewpoint is? Raising issues about DEI and diversity hires is not "obviously hostile nonsense".

It was clearly not - as it was not the comment referenced in the ban. That - again - is an objective truth.

It word in the other comment was also not a slur, but - surprise surprise - the objective truth, again.

I think it's important context that this huge issue is being silenced on the largest c++ community

Interesting that you did not choose to voice your opinions using your main accounts on that community then.

I'd love to, but reddit and cpp keep banning/suspending accounts - so I can't! Funny how that works isn't it?

Nah, that was just the comment I used to get to your profile. I banned you for insulting someone.

That is not true. Here is the message:

Hello, You have been permanently banned from participating in r/cpp because your comment violates this community's rules. You won't be able to post or comment, but you can still view and subscribe to it.

With the link being to https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/1gyiwwc/c_standards_co...

I participated for r/cpp for a very large number of years, including quite a number of high-impact posts - just not with that account.

And would you be so kind to actually link to the comment you banned me for? This is it, for everyone to see and judge:

https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/1gyiwwc/c_standards_co...

and r/cpp mods just woke up, banning everyone who question (am I still allowed to use that word?) this lunatic behavior. For context: A week ago, someone out for blood put out a slander article referencing this amongst other things.

edit: After going on a banning spree, foonathan nuked the thread with "I am not going to deal with this on a Sunday". Nice

phones listen to conversations. I can't believe there are people trying to deny that. It's as obvious as the sky is blue. It's a running gag at this point

The the profiles post was blocked - and likely will be all its future content, so it was literally banned. That's true regardless of you cheer to censor the truth or not

Hi stranger, please stop messing with the scrollbar

There is no such thing as "neurotypical"/"-divergent"

And again the author clickbaits by calling "German-style strings" "German Strings". He did the same thing in July

it's meth. It works the same for everyone. Even better for non-addicts as their receptors haven't been fried

advertising companies still pretending (and pushing the idea) that ads work

There are people who disagree with that idea

The person in the video is not "real". No one speaks like that

Why can't these youtubers be human? Everything about this guy speaks fake. The demeanor, the voice, everything.

yeah, it's awful. I have a 32gig machine and "only" windows 10. And have to go back to micro-managing memory like in winxp times. Restarting programs from time to time - and rebooting every couple of days. Inb4 "free memory is wasted memory" apologists. Programs just flat out refuse to start or crash when memory is >85%.

I don't follow these things often: How is this different than the four before?

I appreciate the effort to leave out the "And now for something completely different" section (on https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-3130/) after the previous drama.

bots voting is orthogonal to moderating. And illegal content: Maybe, but it'll get downvoted=hidden, so not a problem. "Moderation" is inversely proportional to quality in literally every online community in existence.

Just not having moderators - the end. The site has a voting mechanism that will take care of most spammers and other vermin