HN user

bugsbunnyak

530 karma
Posts7
Comments96
View on HN

Both of these served to discover the real market value of things

- Airbnb served to discover that someone always pays the cost of negative externalities.

- Uber served to discover the above, plus that in an environment with low interest rates and significant underemployment, a company can run losses indefinitely while paying peanuts. Calculate the net wage next time you take an Uber, accounting for their cut, depreciation, and a (generous) 75% utilization. That's only feasible at a loss while using funny money to pay desperate people. The Uber app is excellent, credit them for that. They were in the right place and time and executed very well on mobile+geolocation. But they've discovered nothing about market value.

(not interested in the "blah, blah, AI, logistics company" magical thinking. People who say that have short positions in Uber. Uber is Twitter: they could have been a profitable mid-size company making an excellent living selling all sorts of mobile service provisioning; in a capital crunch they cannot afford to pay drivers a market-clearing wage and pay back their over-inflated expectations)

This. 1000 times this. It's not even about automated diagnosis. The software used by most radiologists is more than two decades behind the state of the art, lacking even basic image registration and segmentation capabilities. (source: I've worked with radiologists who review brain images at several tier-one, top-10 hospitals).

If you are lucky, some eager, tech-savvy resident will use 3D Slicer or OsiriX on their personal laptop to coregister and segment images, and do longitudinal volumetric comparison. But those basic tools are not available on the platforms used to read most images.

Major vendors are trying to catch up, but from what I've seen, demand (and thus willingness to invest) is surprisingly limited.

Don't be daft. It might be possible to take you seriously if anyone, ever, had made the same complaint about an article entitled "The Woman Who Will XYZ". In fact, such articles are celebrated as encouraging more STEM awareness and participation by women, providing positive role models, and other benefits -- which I fully support.

I am continually surprised that Netflix has failed to play any real hardball. Seed (ie: astroturf) a class-action lawsuit against Verizon for breach of contract. Make a big PAC donation to the attorney general in a consumer-friendly state like Washington or Massachusetts and let the dogs run. Get the city council of a largish and liberal locale like Seattle to consider a municipal internet service. Heck, cut off service to Verizon subscribers the day House of Cards comes out.

Abortion ban: government-imposed restrictions on the right to terminate genetically-undesirable fetuses. Which of these criteria should not be allowed: Gender? Height? Lack of physical strength? How about, say, statistically-probable homosexuality?

All is not as it seems when you change the optics (edited, restored).

Another Ortiz case 14 years ago

Since apparently I can't reply at that depth:

10th: there is no Federal interest here. Any assertion of justification by nexus would be laughable: these crimes are by users and end-sellers. If the US attorney had evidence of an ongoing interstate operation then they ought to bust that, not the hotel.

5th: I find it hard to describe "heads I win, tails you lose" as due process. If they had not gained outside support, fighting this suit would bankrupt them. I realize that there is no ideal solution to that quandary, but as a result we must prosecutorial discretion to a very high standard.

Prosecutor as bully 14 years ago

How much would it cost to run a full-page ad near the front of The New York Times and Boston Globe, and some local tv ads in Boston? A targeted media campaign and the resulting echoes could easily put a stop to any political aspirations (I'm thinking 60 Minutes, Anderson Cooper, and the like).

I am a little puzzled because the two Best Buy stores close to my house were seemingly sold out of almost every Win8 laptop after Christmas. Though I suppose this could be explained as Best Buy reading the tea leaves well and intentionally understocking.

+1. Sikuli was a dream find a few months ago when I had to upload 100s of images for a rater survey to a locked-down LimeSurvey instance (no ftp allowed). 20 minutes and I had a functioning script that pushed all of the upload buttons and paste the next filename in sequence.

Apple - Think Twice 14 years ago

I bought it specifically for the quadro 2000, for volume-rendering and cuda. Thanks for the heads-up, I didn't realize the W series was created post-IBM.

"Productivity Software" page in the customization dialog. A large banner displays "MS Office - Get tools to express ideas and solve problems with full functionality". However (obviously) there is no possibility to actually select MS Office! Just odd/bemusing oversight.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DICOM

Essentially all modern medical scanners export data in this format.

This fantastic site will let you view (after upload) DICOM images in a web browser:

http://slicedrop.com/

There are a number of accessible (ie not clinical radiology priced) viewers available, the best of the lot for general use being Osirix [1] (OS X only), and ClearCanvas [2] (Windows only). Ginkgo CADx [3] and Mint viewer [4] are also good, and both cross-platform.

There are several well-regard open-source libraries for DICOM: gdcm [5] and DCMTK [6]. Widely used open-source medical image visualization SDKs with DICOM support include MITK [7] and 3D Slicer [8] (the afore-mentioned ClearCanvas is also an SDK in some sense).

[edit: formatting and add link]

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OsiriX

2. http://www.clearcanvas.ca/dnn/

3. http://ginkgo-cadx.com/en/

4. http://www.mint-medical.de/

5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GDCM

6. http://dicom.offis.de/dcmtk.php.en

7. http://www.mitk.org/

8. http://www.slicer.org

Absolutely agreed: to me, Python is a local maximum rather early on the readability vs. complexity graph. I think as complexity increases, an explicitly-typed language becomes much more understandable because local type annotations require less context switching to reason about when compared to an implicit language.

I don't have any basis to evaluate this because I went to a high school with 30 kids and AP was not even in my vocabulary. I am curious about the contrast between these statements:

>AP courses are not, in fact, remotely equivalent to the college-level courses they are said to approximate.

vs.

> The courses cover too much material and do so too quickly and superficially.

Maybe this is a difference in philosophy about what the AP class should be - an in-depth seminar class as opposed to survey? My impression is that HS honors classes are usually seminar style, whereas AP classes, tests, and college credit (if available) is designed like a 101-level class. If that is correct, the survey format for AP seems logical: how could there be a national, standardized test for a seminar class? So AP serves a useful purpose. But if so, his former statement above makes no sense because the latter is a description of every college 101 class.