buddhistdude

would love to see a statistic by model, and maybe some sort of classification to get a sense of how good the model is and how much it costs.

edit: this exists https://artificialanalysis.ai/

I want it to not murder or opress lots of people by mistake

I think what you are talking about is a different kind of cheating than the parent comment

Just to think what this will look like in a couple of years.

No I don't because I'm not claiming that I know that it happened

I take from this that you don't, otherwise you would explain it

How do you know?

Maybe that's what Jesus used on the people that he healed

if it was so obvious to most of us, we wouldn't be having this problem.

Well at least you for yourself can be aware of the danger that AI could assimilate your thinking, I think that's the message of this post.

"The cryptocurrency industry super PACs dumped $14.2 million into the Illinois primaries. 90% of that – $12.8 million – was wasted, in that it went to opposing Democratic candidates who won their primaries"

I read that as them having mistakenly sent the cryptos to the "opposing candidate"

oh about that one... we killed it unfortunately

it would take for him to be less powerful and psycho

you can with the one that I use

Well, things change fast in the age of AI

hazrmard's law

was this written by an LLM?

including the mentioned meta-analysis? if yes, can you explain why you think that it's dubious?

Or the addiction just makes you think that this is good for you when actually you'd feel better without it?

algerians

I find it interesting that when you read this comment, the whole book is already on your computer. And it gets rendered when your press the link.

Edit: actually not true since you use a url shortener

could be automated though?

not necessarily worried, but like put on some pants before entering the room

No worries brother

Can one instruct an LLM to pick the parts of the context that will be relevant going forward? And then discard the existing context, replacing it with the new 'summary'?

not necessarily, but it's not less creative and inventive than what I believe most programmers are doing most of the time. there are relatively few people who invent new patterns (and they actually might be overrepresented on this website). the rest learns and applies those patterns.

no programmer in my company invents things often

some of the activities that we're involved in are not limited in complexity, for example driving a car. you can have a huge amount of experience in driving a car but will still face new situations.

the things that most knowledge workers are working on are limited problems and it is just a matter of time until the machine will reach that level, then our employment will end.

edit: also that doesn't have to be AGI. it just needs to be good enough for the problem.

not fully related to what the parent is saying, but I need to get this off my chest:

isn't this development obviously going to result in the deprecation of the value of the human intellect to near-zero? which is the thing that virtually all people on this platform base their livelihood on?

there's such a deafening silence around this topic on the internet where there should be - i don't know what but not this silence. we don't know what to do right? and we're avoiding this topic.

with this version they broke the assumed wall of llms's developed that was the last copium that we could believe in. the wall is broken and now it's just a matter of time until your capacity to think will be completely unneeded. the machine will do it more accurately and more quickly by orders of magnitude.

am I a doomer? I was in the home country of my parents recently, that is completely dysfunctional and war is on the verge of breaking out. what I learned there is that humans stay ignorant of great dangers until the very moment in which it affects them. this must've been the case with all the great wars that we've had. the water is rising but until I start to suffocate I don't agree to see it. i make up copes, or I think some are going to drown but I'm safe, or I distract myself.

what are all the software engineers here thinking? what's your cope for this? or are we all freezing in shock right now? this o1 is solving problems that i know many of my colleagues can never solve. what are we hoping for I think? I don't have a future because my future was the image that I had of it. and no image of the future that would be nice to keep around seems plausible at this point.

No he is right, he is saying taken to the extreme. The point is the more and more specific you have to prompt, the more you are actually contributing to the result yourself and the less the model is