Why no MacOS support if you claim cross-platform? That's not honest.
HN user
branneman
internet geek. software craftsman/architect/manager. rotterdam. espresso. whisky. techno. http://bran.name/
April Fools I guess, considering the actual commit content:
- many -> persony
- helps -> theylps
- here -> theyre
- historical -> theirstorical
Yes. Exactly this.
Agreed. But why choose if it's easy to add an idiomatic pure-JavaScript/EcmaScript 2021 implementation to compare with as well?
Now find some sources to cite with that timeline, and create a wikipedia article from it!
Well, that is the point of software, to change quicker and cheaper.
Discussion on Reddit: https://reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/n2kliz/can_you_beat...
... but racket basically exists to create parsers and languages. It happens to also be a general programming language. But so is JS nowadays with Node.
In that case, way I ask why you are not a Racket user? Sounds like it'll save you a ton of time and keep your implementations high level.
When should one use Ohm over Racket?
How is Proton a technology/library/sorftware? I got the impression it's just a preconfigured Wine, but not an actual implementation. Sorry if I'm misinformed.
And _if_ that's true, I'm sad about the credits not going to the Wine team.
Racket
Have you seen & tried Racket?