HN user

brainflake

158 karma
Posts8
Comments57
View on HN

Good post - pricing is so very critical (although I do agree with others here that three weeks is such a _very_ short timeframe). It's interesting to think about pricing from a "what's my per-user cost so I can reasonably bootstrap this myself", but it's usually more reasonable (and profitable) to think about it the other way around - "what value am i providing to my user?".

The book "The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing" was a real eye opener for me as I don't come from a business background. The crux is that don't think about it in terms of costs, but how much value (e.g., time saved, leads generated, etc) you are providing and if the price is worth it from the user's perspective.

Average daily volume of VOO over the last 60 days is about 2,000,000 shares. At ~$200/share (it's actually about $220 right now), that's about $400m dollars daily, so unloading $1m would be well under 1% of shares traded in a typical day.

You're right that they're 2 very different investments, but I don't think you can say unequivocally that #1 is better than #2. It all depends on desired returns, risk, etc. Let's face it, if you had given money to Apple in 1976 there was a good chance you were never seeing that money again.

They do provide you with unique reach at the adset level, which will tell you how many users in your audience have been reached.

The simple answer is if you IPO at a certain price and declare you don't plan on growing at all, then nobody will participate in your offering or buy your shares in the open market. It's just a fact of life that as a public company you need to prove to your shareholders that next year your shares will be worth more than right now. Otherwise outside investors have no reason to invest in your company rather than keeping their money in a savings account (or a low risk alternative). The same basic premise applies to VC investments.

That's not to say that a patio11-style business is wrong, just that it's very different. It's personal preference if you've started the business and there's no right or wrong way.

BounceX | New York, NY | Full-Time | Onsite

Our core product is what we call our ‘Behavioral CMS’. We analyze digital body language to make websites way more convenient and less annoying to visitors (which dramatically increases their conversion rate). Our clients include large retailers, publishers and Fortune 500s to help them monetize their traffic more effectively.

We have a world-class, developer friendly culture. In 2015 we were ranked #1 for retention and career development by Computer World. This year we’ve been ranked #7 on the INC 500 list of fastest growing companies (#1 in technology). Our office is in the NY Times building - easily accessible from many locations and floor to ceiling windows with a 360 degree view of the city.

The platform team is looking for engineers with deep knowledge of writing secure, system level software. We collect and process billions of events per day using Golang, Kinesis, DynamoDB, BigQuery and Docker.

http://www.bounceexchange.com/careers/senior-engineer.html

The product team is looking for an expert in PHP and MySQL to create and expand our API's for both internally and externally facing web applications. Full stack experience is a plus here because this person will be building features that respond to our end users (vanilla JS) as well as our internal app (Ember.js).

http://www.bounceexchange.com/careers/backend-engineer,-core...

Feel free to reach out to me personally: falk [at] bounceexchange [dot] com

BounceX | New York, NY | Full-Time | Onsite

Our core product is what we call our ‘Behavioral CMS’. We analyze digital body language to make websites way more convenient and less annoying to visitors (which dramatically increases their conversion rate). Our clients include large retailers, publishers and Fortune 500s to help them monetize their traffic more effectively.

We have a world-class, developer friendly culture. In 2015 we were ranked #1 for retention and career development by Computer World. This year we’ve been ranked #7 on the INC 500 list of fastest growing companies (#1 in technology). Our office is in the NY Times building - easily accessible from many locations and floor to ceiling windows with a 360 degree view of the city.

The platform team is looking for engineers with deep knowledge of writing secure, system level software. We collect and process billions of events per day using Golang, Kinesis, DynamoDB, BigQuery and Docker.

http://www.bounceexchange.com/careers/senior-engineer.html

The product team is looking for an expert in PHP and MySQL to create and expand our API's for both internally and externally facing web applications. Full stack experience is a plus here because this person will be building features that respond to our end users (vanilla JS) as well as our internal app (Ember.js).

http://www.bounceexchange.com/careers/backend-engineer,-core...

Feel free to reach out to me personally: falk [at] bounceexchange [dot] com

While looking at the cap structure might lead to this conclusion, I would bet the farm on the fact that she's gotten some cash out of all of these rounds, or simply through bonuses. Being the CEO of a high profile company (at least in fundraising circles) she can easily make the argument for it.

Node OS 10 years ago

I love node, but a node REPL in lieu of a shell sounds like the worst thing ever.

It's probably not just oil, but rather a general reduction of risk from investors. People are worried about the global economic climate and are pulling their money out of stocks and putting it into more predictable, dependable assets like gold and treasury bonds, which tend to have much lower yields but also much less risk of tanking in value during bad times.

Just because one person doesn't want it doesn't make it a hostile takeover. If the board votes for it and a majority of shareholders approve (as would seem to be the case in your example) then it's definitely not hostile.

True, but I think that the fact that they're using these anti-competitive practices indicates they don't have that firm hold. Predatory pricing will only work as long as they keep doing it. Although I've heard stories of the opposite, where people really get gouged during surge pricing.