bowsamic

It’s easier in most companies to get a cloud bill approved than to ask for a big chunk of cash for hardware and also to pay someone to set it up

I don’t need to give reasons for my son to follow my orders

Why would I tell my son not to drink beer? He can do so as soon as it’s relatively safe to

Significantly worse than the Deutschland ticket

Same on macOS. Could be that we are missing some native compilation option though

ePub compatibility issues are one of the worst parts of having a Kobo reader. I genuinely miss my Kindle and its simple but reliable MOBI format. At least there everything worked

No, I don’t want to name and shame. It was a few years ago

Inkscape is the only software that I see people get so defensive about when criticised. I even had the lead dev appear in my mentions and try and start fighting me on twitter when I complained on my own timeline about the performance on macOS. Weird culture

Solipsism is wrong.

This is why I don’t use this site. Low IQ discussions and insults from morons

You don’t need any observations at all to build up a complete knowledge of the entire universe. Hegel showed this

It can resolve them though

Nobody can ever know an ultimate why, for obvious and well established philosophical reasons

Yes we can, you are just presupposing that philosophy is ultimately ineffective. For example Hegel gave a presuppositionless development of all metaphysics among other things. It’s not some kind of philosophical consensus that ultimate justification is impossible

I’m just curious if you are so dependent on LLMs that the idea of not using them at all seems extreme to you

But I wonder does this mean no AI was used at all? Even for say, code review?

Would that be surprising to you?

Any logic with LEM

This makes it good for formal maths, but bad for philosophy, since it means it can’t encode the speculative movement

For me the widespread fear over this is evidence that it’s different from syntax highlighting and stuff

Just because you use AI doesn't mean your brain grows a black hole from which information can never return.

How do you know this? I’m not taking that risk

Small stdlib, “implement it yourself” philosophy to even things like classes, diverging language versions and fragmentation (a lot of people don’t like any of the post 5.1 changes), bad tooling and editor support, dynamic duck typed language with no type hints

It's usually 6 months probation in Germany, not 3 months

I’m sure you can learn how to use it

If only the demoscene wasn’t so horrible culturally. It’s absolutely full of old sceners who have “earned” being dicks to people, and unfortunately many newbies who think that the way to be a real scener is to copy that behaviour. The constant flamewars on pouet.net are embarrassing. It is a good reminder that the internet did not used to be a nicer place though

I'm incapable of doing basic operations in Finder or changing basic system settings, and random shit I didn't want to press pops up when I'm doing other things

Why?

It’s a nice demonstration of this software but it really sounds very little like a 303

Code review basically never actually means thinking through all the code again as if you wrote it

Even if they do (often not the case) this will be far from exhaustive, and likely won’t reflect the structure of the application very well. Vision based testing is often combined with accessibility based testing

The issue isn't when the programmers start using it. It's when the project managers start using it and think that they're producing something similar to the programmers

Many companies have totally banned it. For example at Qt it is banned on all company devices and networks

Most games back in the day were written in assembly