bobbyi

That could be habit if she got used to one side rather than brain asymetry

I thought this would work:

#define C(x) (sizeof(char[x]), x)

sizeof is a compile-time operation so x need to be known at compile time.

It didn't work as expected. It turns out there is an exception and the standard says that sizeof is actually calculated at runtime specifically for variable length arrays:

The sizeof operator yields the size (in bytes) of its operand, which may be an expression or the parenthesized name of a type. The size is determined from the type of the operand. The result is an integer. If the type of the operand is a variable length array type, the operand is evaluated; otherwise, the operand is not evaluated and the result is an integer constant.

He's not the boss anymore at this point (2003). Ballmer took over as CEO in 2000.

It is if the object can't be meaningfully cast to the type. I'd expect to get an exception. That's why they exist.

For example, consider explicitly casting the string "abc" to an int. Python throws a ValueError. Ruby silently ignores the problem and gives 0. I consider the Ruby behavior to be a gotcha.

I'm selecting 70B and it is coming back with "Answer | Phind-34B Model".

I'm not sure if it's really using the 34B model or if the UI is wrong about which one it used

The other NYC bridges are all (I think?) named Bridge, but they went with Crossing here because Outerbridge Bridge sounds weird.

Another NYC one: A lot of people think "major" in The Major Deegan Expressway means it is a significant expressway, but actually the expressway is named after (Army) Major William Deegan

Why can't you search them? In the android app at least, I've never had a problem with search working properly

lsof is also good for seeing what files a process is using https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2012/08/lsof-command-examples/

Searching for /bin/[ gets reasonable results for me

https://www.google.com/search?q=%2Fbin%2F%5B

The usual justification for having a concept of "undefined behavior" at all is specifically to allow compilers to "rule out this possibility" so they can make this sort of optimization.

Materialized views handle this scenario, but sqlite doesn't have them

log.exception is also usually bad when you are re-raising the exception. That often results in same stacktrace logged multiple times in a row which can be confusing or at least annoyingly verbose.

But it can be helpful to log an error message (without stacktrace) to give context that is available only in this frame before letting the exception propagate to whoever ultimately handles and logs it.

Walking past an eatery with outdoor seating, I overheard one diner say the phrase "process raw logs" and I thought, "wow, I guess that is one of those tricky problems that basically everyone ends up dealing with".

And then I heard "... with a chainsaw. It's a chainsaw mill" and realized I may have misunderstood the context.

Is this similar to std::optional? It's a box containing a value. Copying the optional copies the value.

I wanted to get tickets to see Messi when his team (Inter Miami) comes to my area (NYC).

This is a typical weekend NY Red Bulls game. Tickets are available for $10 : https://www.stubhub.com/new-york-red-bulls-harrison-tickets-...

This is the following weekend against Miami. Tickets start at more than $500 (~$650 with fees) : https://www.stubhub.com/new-york-red-bulls-harrison-tickets-...

That project already exists https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp

I don't think it's desired for chatgpt which is a back and forth chat.

But this application seems to take one query and give back one answer so its workflow wants a complete response up front.

There is no scalar instruction for calculating the absolute value, so it uses a negate and conditional move instead.

Wait, what? x86 has specialized instructions for all kinds of things but doesn't have absolute value?

Recycling Bin is the normal name in US English too. I'm in the US and when I search google for "Recycle Bin" (https://www.google.com/search?q=recycle+bin), the results (in order) are

* "Recycling Bins" from Home Depot

* "Recycling Bins" from Amazon

* "Find the Recycle Bin" from Microsoft

* "Recycling Bins" from Lowes.com

* "Recycle Bins" from Target

* "Recycling Bins" from Walmart

The roadmap here is completely focused on ChatGPT and GPT-4. I wonder what portion of their resources is still going to other areas (DALL-E, audio/ video processing, etc.)

The June issue of the Atlantic has an article about giving control of nuclear weapons to AI

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2023/06/ai-warf...

I haven't watched it yet, but the Practical Deep Learning for Coders course that's available on YouTube is often recommended

https://course.fast.ai/

Theres also Py Spy, a profiling tool that can generate flame charts containing a mix of python and C (or C++) calls.

https://github.com/benfred/py-spy

It's worked really well for my needs

Concepts improve the situation with error messages for templates. You get an error message saying the equivalent of "You can't pass this argument to this template function because type X doesn't match concept Y" rather than the esoteric one you get now.

The exam is from 2019 and GPT-4's training cutoff is 2021, so it should know about the experiment.

It's also because the companies are backed by VCs. VCs get their money from limited partners like pension funds who don't want their money invested in porn.

Did we need to wipe out ants? Or anything to reign supreme on earth?

Yes? Well not to ants, but to "anything". There absolutely are species that humans made extinct.

Did they put in work specifically to improve hands and other failure cases? Or is this purely a side effect of a generally bigger/ better model?

I thought superior UI was the reason to use Spotify rather than YouTube Music, at least if you don't care about Spotify's exclusive podcasts?

Maybe they get more sales that way?

If I can pick between two items on Amazon for the same price and one is fulfilled by Amazon, I buy that one.