blambeau

Didn't know about it, thanks @aerzen

good to know. Should we join forces ?

Which one ?

We should write power users, maybe.

Peppol interconnecting No Code tools like Make and others

Check finitio.io

Might be an alternative with less complexity for a simple filtering use case.

Sorry about that

SQL does not support lambda functions.

I need to check what we will do in that case.

Claude did, I swear

The parser was built gradually though, with logs of increments under automated tests.

Point taken. Will see what I can do.

Probably TODAY + Duration({ days: 30 }) would be a better example then.

Claude Code helped me make a Typescript implementation of BMG (https://www.relational-algebra.dev/)

BMG initially existed in Ruby (with a SQL compiler there that hasn't been ported to TS yet).

You no longer have any excuse to build complex Typescript/Javascript code to manipulate data. Just learn RA.

Who else finds that Notion, Make, N8n, Klaro Cards and all the others need a decent expression language ?

Great stuff :-)

Most introductions to relational algebra lack effective tooling, while SQL is closer to a calculus than an algebra

I hope university teachers will see here an opportunity for practical exercises with their students !

Démo: https://twitter.com/hearlamb/status/1423319975293603843?s=19

Screencast here: https://yourbackendisbroken.dev/tutorial.html

(lead dev here). Not intended, as I don't use Rails myself. But I would of course support every PR making Bmg compatible/great with it.

AFAIK Arel is not a real algreba, since it does not really allow composing relations the way we want.

More info here: http://www.try-alf.org/blog/2013-10-21-relations-as-first-cl...

I'm the author. If you are a software developer or run a software company, how would you define your global test strategy? What and why do you test?

I'm not very good at naming things. I'm aware of the name clash with many other tools and would really like to find another name. If you have any better idea, just let me know.

The point here is to have a separate language. Data interoperability is about having multiple languages, not having only one to rule the world.

Is Amazon running Rails or Rubygems?

Is "which was designed only for parsing trusted input" written anywhere in Psych doc? Psych is shipped with Ruby, is it written in Ruby doc maybe?

Because when you write "Rails vulnerabilities are not Rails'" (http://www.revision-zero.org/rails-vulnerabilities-are-not-r...), most people respond "yes it is".

But thanks for your work anyway.

> Please, if you find an issue like this, be nice. Tell the maintainers privately.

Nick. I dont support today's PoC, I don't, really. But I told you. Twice in a week. I feel deeply sad now.

Does anyone knows whether if would be possible to level up $SAFE only during tainted input parsing (JSON, XML, YAML, etc.)?

I mean, Ruby's $SAFE level provides a way to tackle security issues but apparently few developers use it. Wouldn't be useful to search for patterns of use there?

And don't forget to contribute ;-) thanks

what do you mean? Is it very objective then?

Great! travis-ci.org is a useful yet fun platform. The fact that Rails is now tested also guarantees that the project will be more mature really soon. That's very good news! Congratulations.