bitJericho

Sounds great, won't work. Nobody who's in the system wants it changed. The only people willing to even work in the system are corrupt or unable to cope outside of the system.

It's true. You can only win an election with piles of money. With gerrymandering and lying. The US government is a train wreck

Well it's true in the us, Russia, china, Australia. That's not everywhere but that is quite a lot of ground.

If you say so.

A contract won't stop him from suing you.

Maybe she just did it for the money.

The only kind of people the government can attract are buffoons that can't be successful elsewhere.

There's an entire section of the post office devoted to verification. I can guarantee you that they are checking this.

Indeed. The only relief will be the rich factory owners paying livable wages to the public via taxation.

looks like they just need to start clicking a lower random percentage.

I agree, but I think it's best to just have an email address right at the top of the email for a customer to reply to, or use the reply-to headers.

When you have tens of thousands of customers that's a lot of emails.

If you want to waste money on resolving 6 month out of date vacation replies than be my guest.

I've never seen it. I'm sure that works "in theory"

TLDR, an article by someone who doesn't know how email works nor how companies use email queues.

or.. you know, a reply-to header where real emails can be sent to...

Having worked in email queues, filters are nowhere near good enough. Nothing is more infuriating than wasting hours on bounces.

Hackish? This is a great design: http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Mai...

I've worked email queues. The customer's account will be full of auto-responders and it'll be impossible to find the real communications.

Having managed email queues, the no reply email is essential, because everyone and their uncle uses auto replies. That said, I'm all for including a real email address somewhere so a user can reply.

You absolutely should beat up the phone agents. They are part of the problem just like everyone else in the health industry.

This is because anybody who knows what's going on wants health insurance outlawed. Everyone else just wants to milk sick people for every dime they have.

Wow, 4 people in 1975-1976 made over 90k in todays dollars and still declared bankruptcy and dissolved their student loans.

The report doesn't say why those 4 specifically went bankrupt, but does talk about some issues affecting these people. Injury, large business losses. Guess we better ban anybody from dissolving student loans!

Really? Source?

Indeed. Except you have every right to know all the fees at that time. You can include those in your offer to the seller. Or even say the seller assumes all the fees. This is part of the negotiation because you're the one making the offer.

Read a book.

Earnest money is used when you've already made an offer. How do you make an offer while not including the cost of the fees in the sale? That sounds like poor negotiation.

Earnest money is used when you've already made an offer. How do you make an offer while not including the cost of the fees in the sale? That sounds like poor negotiation.

If you sign a 2 year contract and don't get the phone you're kinda getting ripped off.

haha, you need to learn how to negotiate. (All fees are negotiable)