HN user

bigphishy

153 karma
Posts4
Comments178
View on HN

facebook, inc. is not just an amiercan issue. For years they have been nefariously bribing other countries to promote their website.

Take for example internet.org internet takeover attempt in India, or a better example, in Brazil facebook, inc. bribes local telcom providers to provide whatsapp access for free ( users are not charged data usage )

their agenda is clear. abuse and lie through their teeth, making as much money and power as possible.

facebook, inc. is a cancer on our global society.

In all my experience using wikipedia it has been successful at providing facts and accurate references.

I don't mean to attack the speaker here, but that former cofounder of wikipedia you just cited... isn't he an extremist neo-conservative? Why did he leave wikipedia in the first place? What are his proposed solutions?

Science is the result of the scientific method.

Whether you agree with science is up to you, and you can voice your opinion on it because in US we have the bill of rights ( thank you, founding fathers... )

But voicing an opinion and labeling it science, without using the scientific method, that's ignorance.

Far be it for me to get sucked into politics, but I think the difference here can be explained that more evidence came out. It is only now becoming clear exactly how detrimental, and for how long the CCP has been obstructing investigations.

The more time that passes, the more clear it is that there is some obstructionism, and that makes the CCP look guilty.

I don't think either US political party said that no further scrutiny should be applied. Everyone wanted more investigation.

I also think that we should focus on the issue. If you want to make another issue about bias in the mainstream media, that's a much larger can of worms, and I definitely support that and agree with you.

I am nonplussed, if the institution is effective and well managed, than I do not care about its size. Look at what the non-profit Bell Labs pumped out during the 1950's-1960's, all of it was non-profit and approved by a state-sponsored monopoly of ma bell. The intellectual achievements directly went into the US private sector to the great benefit of US citizens.

Precisely right, look at Bell Labs, look what came out of that! transistors, tcp/ip, satellites, cellphones just to name a few. thank god for bell labs and the state approved monopoly that allowed bell labs to fund science without profits, although it didn't hurt that they also gathered the brightest minds in the country at that time.

[dead] 5 years ago

While I agree with this, I am confused why this was posted to hacker news without any technical stories.

Specifically the denial of man made global climate change.

I am libertarian and conservative leaning, although, modern day "conservatives" are far from conservative in any sense of the word. For example, true conservatives advocated for abortion rights, because the government has no business regulating what a citizen can do to their body.

TLDR; I will never side with a party that insanely denies climate change.

IF it merges. That's a big "if" The ethereum Miners will rebel, "The Merge" will introduce catastrophic bugs, 0-days will appear.

However, if it does successfully transfer to proof of stake, we're in for a long and exciting ride.

Trust is a valuable commodity these days.