bhuztez

The Great Cultural Revolution were the Golden Age of PRC. The economy grew rapidly. If you had the Little Red Book, you could take a free train to join the Great Rally held at Beijing.

Hundreds of thousands of micro-computers had been built during that period. For example, there were many used in the textile factories. Workers there were encouraged to learn programming. They wrote programs to control the weaving machines.

After Capitalist Roaders seize the power through a palace coup, they told everybody that, the Great Cultural Revolution wrecked the economy. So most were ditched.

As programmer shortage emeraged in the 1980s, Capitalist Roaders start promoting "grab toddlers to computers".

Being a fanboy of Universal(统一) Token(文字)， I think Chinese is the most easy one to work with. Since Chinese has no characters, it just have a few thousand tokens. Unicode code point is good starting point for Chinese.

What about English? Just as there is no natural boundary between tokens in English, there is no natural boundary between words in Chinese. Before LLM became popular, people had invented many ways to do Chinese word segmentation, just like nowadays people are inventing many ways to do tokenization.

However in the past, most of the time, you would end up with ngrams. If we learn that from history, ngrams should be a good starting point for English. For example, word "token" should be 3 tokens, "tok", "oke", "ken". Once add Chinese, everything should be just fine.

To be more controversial, I would say there is no such a language called Chinese. They are a group of languages who adopted Universal Token. Now it is time for English to jump on the bandwagon.

take a look at mine ( https://github.com/bhuztez/borrow )

Lift does not has python interop. the lift code run in the python shell is interpreted by naive python code. It runs very slow, and consume lots of memory than you might ever expected. As in the matmul example, dot product is calculated in two steps, there will be an 8x8x8 array when interpreted. When compiled, this huge array will be eliminated with the great help of isl ( http://isl.gforge.inria.fr/ ).

lift does not use pyopencl. It intends to generate C code that could be easily linked.

It depends heavily on isl ( http://isl.gforge.inria.fr/ ). There is no Lisp bindings around.

the OpenCL generation is mostly stolen from ppcg ( http://ppcg.gforge.inria.fr/ ) Unlike ppcg, right now, the local memory is not properly handled, you can see that there are some complicated expression here.

__kernel void kernel0( __global float v0[8][8], __global float v2[8][8]){ __local float local_v0[2][2][16]; float private_v2[2][2]; int b0 = get_group_id(0); int b1 = get_group_id(1); int t0 = get_local_id(0); int t1 = get_local_id(1);

for(int c2 = 0; (c2 <= 15); c2 = c2 + 1){ if(((((((((30 * t0) + (31 * t1)) + (16 * b0)) + (28 * c2)) + 31) % 32) >= 16) || (b1 == t0))){ local_v0[t0][t1][c2] = (v0[((((2 * t0) + t1) + (4 * c2)) / 8)][((((2 * t0) + t1) + (4 * c2)) % 8)]); } }

barrier(CLK_LOCAL_MEM_FENCE | CLK_GLOBAL_MEM_FENCE); for(int c0 = (2 * b0); (c0 <= 7); c0 = c0 + 4){ for(int c1 = (2 * b1); (c1 <= 7); c1 = c1 + 4){ private_v2[(((-2 * b0) + c0) / 4)][(((-2 * b1) + c1) / 4)] = 0.000000; for(int c2 = 0; (c2 <= 3); c2 = c2 + 1){ for(int c5 = (2 * c2); (c5 <= ((2 * c2) + 1)); c5 = c5 + 1){ private_v2[(((-2 * b0) + c0) / 4)][(((-2 * b1) + c1) / 4)] = ((private_v2[(((-2 * b0) + c0) / 4)][(((-2 * b1) + c1) / 4)]) + ((local_v0[(c2 % 2)][((-2 * c2) + c5)][(((2 * t0) + (2 * c0)) + (c2 / 2))]) * (local_v0[b1][t1][((((-2 * b1) + c1) / 4) + (2 * c5))]))); } } private_v2[(((-2 * b0) + c0) / 4)][(((-2 * b1) + c1) / 4)] = (private_v2[(((-2 * b0) + c0) / 4)][(((-2 * b1) + c1) / 4)]); } }

for(int c0 = 0; (c0 <= 1); c0 = c0 + 1){ for(int c1 = 0; (c1 <= 1); c1 = c1 + 1){ v2[(((2 * b0) + t0) + (4 * c0))][(((2 * b1) + t1) + (4 * c1))] = (private_v2[c0][c1]); } }

barrier(CLK_LOCAL_MEM_FENCE | CLK_GLOBAL_MEM_FENCE); }

HTML5 MediaRecorder

It is a pity that they don't use Chinese symbols but invented their own. I really hope one day I can write programs in Chinese, i.e., programs are also valid Chinese, and have the same meaning.

jailbreaker:jailbreaker

turning down your server is not as much fun as cheating.

shameless plug, I have just worked out a JavaScript class loader[1] of Robocode a few week ago. you don't have to turn security off with this class loader, unlike some approaches suggested on RoboWiki[2]. I'm currently trying to get Jython work with Robocode.

[1] https://github.com/xiazheteng/robocode-classloaders [2]: http://robowiki.net/wiki/Other_JVM_Languages