HN user

bhiggins

299 karma

Programmer in Seattle.

Email: rot13("ouvttvaf@tznvy.pbz")

Posts3
Comments241
View on HN

no, these people just feel so entitled that they want to be able to party party party AND feel (not actually be) well-educated. anyone who works harder than them and learns more is threatening to this feeling.

Reverse.jar 16 years ago

maybe next year, if you keep up the good work, you'll be reading about Appeal to Some Website.

Reverse.jar 16 years ago

I am mostly doing programming in languages with GC, which in this case is fine because it's OK for it to go, you know, kind of slow.

Reverse.jar 16 years ago

Your argument is so compelling. Now I see how wrong I've been. I'll just accept everything the ivory tower says from now on, on any topic, unconditionally. Brilliant.

RockMelt 16 years ago

maybe they can get together with kiha and combine their pointless efforts.

Reverse.jar 16 years ago

I'm impressed with lambda calculus as a mathematical formalisms and its equivalence with TMs, and I am impressed but not overly enamored with homoiconicity & metaprogramming/macros. I like conditionals. Not a fan of marketing minimal syntax but having special forms. Not a fan of cons as a a building block for everything. Not a big believer in garbage collection. And certainly not a believer that Lisp is a practical programming language for much of anything these days.

But don't let me stop you from caaaaadring away!

Reverse.jar 16 years ago

You know, a lot of non-academic languages are pretty crappy... like Ruby, or PHP. But I'm not impressed with languages out of academia either. I don't care about your -morphisms or fancy type systems...

these "Learn You..." (NB: this does not include LPTHW) books seem like a post-modern version of the "For Dummies" series. So, if you enjoyed the vapid "For Dummies"-style jokes but wanted more non-sequiturs, these are the books for you.

here is what I sent Google in response:

I love Gmail. I've loved it since the beginning when I got an invite code from [redacted] and I think it has just gotten better and better over the years. But, I am disappointed that you didn't commit to being more careful with how you handle privacy leaks with new products. Either make a commitment that you won't intentionally do something like this again, or admit that your plan is to "educate" people about auto-added privacy-violating products that ride on Gmail's coattails. If you plan on going the latter route, please let me know so I can switch to a different email provider now.