HN user

bep

230 karma

Developer, currently working in www.librerianorma.com and www.axesnet.com

Posts10
Comments53
View on HN

> Time Machine (and the time slider in Solaris) allow you to see and restore last week's version of any file without you consciously having to back it up. Previous versions do it, but with less eye candy

[dead] 17 years ago

How many submissions about the same history, but with different authors, do we need?

[dead] 17 years ago

Sadly, what is the consensus by uneducated people under 60? Right wing organizations are not only constituted by old educated people.

And if that was true, the message for my country, Colombia, is hang in there? The amount of violence that is fulled by the illegal drugs is awful. Every day something horrifying is discovered.

Edit: my rebuttal could be seeing as rash. But is just a very frustrating situation with not clear hope in sight.

Do you have any idea how many man-hours go into the preparation of WWDC talks?

Because preparing for TechEd, PDC, WPC is cheap, isn't it? Or their presentations are not any good? The truth is Apple knows that people will pay for those things, so they charge for them.

One, the applications that matter to people are changing. For many people, programs like web browsers and iTunes are now opened frequently, whereas a decade ago those apps either didn't exist or weren't nearly as relevant. So who is to say that 2 decades of Windows software adds up to much these days?

Ignoring old applications that an enterprise needs to use, the amount of aplications that Windows has in the last 2 years are very vast, and lots of people need them.

Then there's the fact that desktop programs have grown and grown, and most users don't seem to adopt even a fraction of the features. What took two decades to develop will not take two decades to "replace", because only a fraction of the features will really be required for most people to make the jump.

Not everyone uses the same 20% of features. Joel Spolsky said it better than me: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000020.html

Besides, develop the core of the programs doesn't mean they are useful or polish. Or that people who hates change (like the ones who hate the Office ribbon) will like to learn to use another program.

And most of those huge apps should have been stopped at version 2.0. After awhile, big version numbers are meaningless; even for Apple, what on Earth makes the latest iTunes worthy of a version 8? They're still over-hyping the software, but not much is being added, so these old apps are not really as sophisticated as they appear to be.

Versions are usually overhyped, after all they need to sell. That doesn't mean they haven't do anything worthy. The majority of software is very different between 2 major versions.