HN user

beernet

276 karma
Posts11
Comments202
View on HN
Leanstral 1.5 22 days ago

This went to market horribly (if you can even call it that), just look at the comments. Mistral played themselves big time over the past ~18 months. Non-competitive products and models combined with bad marketing and GTM...Oh Europe

Claude Sonnet 5 22 days ago

they have shit developer relations

Not true

model that's mostly worse while being more expensive

Not true

they can ride a wave of misinformation.

Not true

Claude Sonnet 5 22 days ago

Claude Code is still a meme

Claude Code generates more revenue than OpenAI...It appears to be a nice meme.

Claude Sonnet 5 22 days ago

Anthropic's run on the model and product side of things is highly impressive. They got Sam A. punching the air consistently, which is well-deserved and self-inflicted above all.

If I was an investor I'd be very worried, to say the least. These guys had all the chances to be established across the relevant LLM players and are blowing it at this very moment....remarkable. With all the attention on and hunger for "sovereignty" one would think they would be the ones capitalizing the most....nope, not at all

What does it say about progress that the same laws that protect human rights also stifle innovation?

Claiming that GDPR and the EU AI Act "protect human rights" is very, very far-fetched. How does the training of, say, Claude or GPT-X models, hurt human rights?

Absolutely not, even if Europe was given all of the compute in the world. The issues are much much worse. Starting at "data privacy", continuing with the "EU AI Act" and just an overall mindset of regulation and German angst. Many structures in the EU actively prevent and fight against innovation. Oftentimes more subtle but the consequences stay the same. If you ever had to use one of the "sovereign" AI provides such as StackIT, OVH and the-like, I feel with you. It is just so bad in terms of product and performance, there is no comparison at all with Hyperscalers, and it shows. Eventually, it's a cultural and structural problem along the way and the future here looks horrible.

Yes, I mean exactly these guys, who did effectively nothing since these "glory" days (which are not really so glory if you Look at the entire story).

This insitution could not exist a minute without tax payer money and provides very, very little in return. Mediocre (at best) employees with the work ethic of public officials, and we know what this means when talking Germany...

Like that, a few companies are specialized in sucking public funds and delivering nothing. Or just the minimum to say that they did something.

Agreed. Fraunhofer institute in Germany is a prime example.

Some people here truly need a bunch of lessons in economics and capital markets. This is not about making a profit at this point in time. Each of these companies could turn profitable im a heartbeat if they wanted to. Which would be exactly the moment in which they lost the race and become irrelevant.

Companies are innovating things that significantly enhance human capabilities and people will still find a reason to drag them down. I am not a fan of either these companies. At the same time, I strongly disagree with these doomer scenarios as they are dangerous for progress of humanity.

Claude Opus 4.8 2 months ago

Ultimately I think the only way you can trust benchmarks is if you build them yourself and keep them secret from the AI labs.

I agree.

At the same time, one of the first things we see in the HN comments when a new model is released are pelicans on a bike. Makes you wonder where the priorities of the AI "community" lie when karma farming is the main motivation for model "evaluation".

I guess tech has been good enough to provide some kind of economic cushion that you can retain a reasonable life style as home depot as your only source of income.

This is a nice understatement. What we see here is privilege at work and phrasing it in a likable manner. "Tech" folks appear to be particularly vulnerable to this type of framing.