batuhandumani

Codeberg was never really intended as a place for small scale or one person teams to host vibe coded projects. It is more of a platform for opensource projects, medium and large teams, and people who take this work seriously. Many users also moved there after Github began pushing AI features so aggressively.

I created my account two years ago, but I have barely used it. I am gonna deleting it so that i do not take up space unnecessarily. Still, one thing should not be forgotten, those who fail to adapt eventually fall behind.

Another issue is what stance they would have taken if the vote had yielded the exact opposite result. I sense a whiff of a long-term self-serving approach in Codeberg’s stance. Who can guarantee that a platform with open-source, human-written code won’t eventually make that code available for use in models?

In a few years, https://killedbygoogle.com/

Life is a gamble

https://bthndmn12.github.io/ i havent updated since 2024

You're truly judging the book by its cover, but I have to give credit where it's due the abstract is very long.

tf-lite micro library has many advantages, and the first of these is the tensorFlow framework itself. You can train the model easily and then implement the same or a similar architecture on esp-32s without much effort. Another advantage is its optimization and you can easily intervene in various memory optimizations and even though it is not a large one, it does have a community.

Apart from these, for example, the author implemented the model the traditional way using C, but it is more convenient to use tf-lite micro on esp32s with the Berry script language.

However, since I have never used onnxin this kind of project, I cant speak to its advantages, so comparisons are difficult from my perspective. But as I said, tf-lite and offer benefits like easy integration, good optimization, and as the name implies, tensorFlow.

The interface and the way the language model is used is amazing. I feel like I'm looking at a lecture note or reading an article and it's a real departure from other language model interfaces and content. Even beautiful integrations of such language models like NotebookLM are rare and most of them are identical. Especially the fact check and explore part is very good. I wonder if there will be a user login or will it continue without any login? I hope it gets enough support and the project will continue.

I did not in any way acknowledge that this article was created by LLM. I only said that LLM translated the following text into English and also i am going to add my own translation. I think you are a bit offended. I just asked you what makes you think that this article was created from scratch by LLM and you are still insulting me in some way by saying that it could not have been written by me. I am leaving you the original untranslated text of the article in Turkish. Let any LLM create the following article in Turkish in this rhyme and I will stop speaking Turkish.

Original text before translation: "Bu tarz yazılar, makaleler ve deyişler bana Luddite hareketini hatırlatıyor. Maalesef olacak olanı engellemek bizim elimizde olan bir şey değil. Yel değirmenlerine karşı savaşarak ancak elde tutulan mızrak bükülür. Zamanın ruhu ileride veya en kısa zamanda bunun gerçekleşeceğini gösteriyor. Developer'lar zeki, çalışkan ve işinde iyi insanlar olsa bile aşırı verimli ve bir o kadar bilgi kaynağına erişimi olan bu hesaplama canavarlarına karşı her zaman bir yönden eksik ve aciz olacaklardır. Bu yüzden bu tarz görüşler yerine daha önemli olan şu kavrama yönelmek gerekir. Peki bundan sonra ne olacak?"

My translation to English without any help from translation tools(google translate, deepl or any LLMs): "This kind of writings, articles and sayings reminds me Luddite movement. Unfortunately we are not able to stop what is going to happen. Fighting against windmills only bends our spear. Spirit of the time says, it will happen in the future. Developers can smart, hardworking and good at their job but they can't compete against these powerful and can able to access all data sources, machines. Because of that instead of thesekind of thoughts and views, we should focuse to the this idea. What is going to happen next?"

as you can see, my main translation is not as good as LLMs because these tools are great for machine translation tasks. this is reason which you dont able to understand why i used for translation. so what was the reason you think the main text is ai?!

"Developer'lar zeki, çalışkan ve işinde iyi insanlar olsa bile aşırı verimli ve bir o kadar bilgi kaynağına erişimi olan bu hesaplama canavarlarına karşı her zaman bir yönden eksik ve aciz olacaklardır." in here i didnt use "da" addition after " ve bir o kadar ". normally in turkish you need to add this addition because nature of this language needs and it gives a meaning of "able" word in English and also it is not necessary to add "da" addition because it doesn't have to be, because that's what it means when it isn't. "eksik ve aciz" is a false usage if you know this language. There is an expression disorder here, but I used it like that to fit the natural flow and narrative style of the sentence. at the first paragraph there is word "deyiş", it is rarely used word. "Deyiş" is like a kind of public speech. It is an address to the people, but on a smaller scale and at the same time contains the meaning that one can speculatively express one's own opinion. What is it that makes you underestimate my intellectual knowledge and general knowledge so much?

edit: i have added an explanation of the shortcomings of the original text

I used for just translation. What makes you think this my thoughts are AI? Which parts specifically?

The concepts of "preventing what is to come is not within our control" and "So, what will happen next?" do not philosophically contradict each other. Furthermore, what I am referring to here is not necessarily related to determinism.

The question "What will happen next?" implies that something may have already happened now, but in the next step, different things will unfold. Preventing certain outcomes is difficult because knowledge does not belong to a single entity. Even if one manages to block something on a local scale, events will continue to unfold at a broader level.

What I mean by Zeitgeist is this: once an event begins, it becomes unstoppable. The most classic and cliché examples include Galileo’s heliocentric theory and the Inquisition, or Martin Luther initiating the Protestant movement.

Some ideas, once they start being built upon by certain individuals or institutions of that era, continue to develop in that direction if they achieve success. That’s why I say, "Zeitgeist predicts it this way." Researchers who have laid down important cornerstones in this field (e.g., Ilya Sutskever, Dario Amodei, etc.)[1, 2] suggest that this is bound to happen eventually, one way or another.

Beyond that, most of the hardware developments, software optimizations, and academic papers being published right now are all focused on this field. Even when considering the enormous hype surrounding it, the development of this area will clearly continue unless there is a major bottleneck or the emergence of a bubble.

Many people still approach such discussions sarcastically, labeling them as marketing or advertising gimmicks. However, as things stand, this seems to be the direction we are headed.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugvHCXCOmm4 [2] https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1i2nugu/ilya_s...

Such writings, articles, and sayings remind me of the Luddite movement. Unfortunately, preventing what is to come is not within our control. By fighting against windmills, one only bends the spear in hand. The Zeitgeist indicates that this will happen soon or in the near future. Even though developers are intelligent, hardworking, and good at their jobs, they will always be lacking and helpless in some way against these computational monsters that are extremely efficient and have access to a vast amount of information. Therefore, instead of such views, it is necessary to focus on the following more important concept: So, what will happen next?