bathtub365

The algorithmic trading firms were already doing this via scraping. What I’m curious about is if they’re going to also impose a slight delay between when posts show up in the API vs when they’re posted on the website.

In BC when they were at their worst the sky was dark yellow and the sun was a very dark blood red. It was like something I’d never seen before. Think the light level in Seattle during an extremely overcast day with a low ceiling, but everything you look at has been coloured yellow by the sunlight passing through the smoke. It looks a lot like photos from the various Mars missions.

Many of these fires are not effectively manageable by people when they get out of control (which can happen easily since they are in very remote areas), and there are a lot of them. They are also spread out over a huge geographical area. The scale is unimaginable so it isn’t a staffing problem.

How does that work, do you not pay the developers who build and maintain this software?

What PC are they going to get for a comparable price, that also has a disc drive? The Steam Machine came out more expensive than they wanted due to the current component price crisis and doesn’t have a disc drive.

And even then, where is anyone buying physical PC releases?

The majority of respondents claiming this is because of Sony ending production of disc based games seems crazy to me. How do they think you get games on PC? My Steam Deck doesn’t have a disc drive and desktop PC case doesn’t even have a 5.25” drive bay.

Apple is obviously the victim but prevention is easier than what is happening now, which is potentially going to court, discovery, etc.

That’s a fair point. I do think Game Pass was a major strategic misstep, but I assume they were also pushed to show regular recurring revenue which obviously flies in the face of a traditional game publisher’s revenue pattern.

Also IO Interactive, Guerrilla Games, Santa Monica Studio

Phil Spencer had already put it in the ditch by the time she took over. “Everything is an Xbox” was a joke of a strategy, spending $70 billion on a company with a weak slate in the Activision purchase

Carmack hasn’t worked at id for 13 years

YouTube has excellent creators for almost any topic you can think of and for almost any video style you can think of

How do you know it’s crappy? Have you read the code?

The US government deemed it necessary to snoop on foreign governments and citizens decades ago and is doing it on a continuous basis. Also on their own government and citizens.

In all of the software you’ve written, are you aware of how many on-screen pixels you’ve overdrawn?

Why do they even need coders to fix these bugs? It would be an order of magnitude (at least) to ask Claude to find and fix them, and it will likely be successful.

Building in the physical world has physical and time constraints that cannot be overcome, which is one of the reasons architecture (and engineering) are so important in this domain. In software development these constraints were only inherent when people were writing the majority of the software. I feel like I’m seeing what I thought were fundamental constraints being eroded by the increasing speed and correctness of these tools and it’s making me reconsider the importance of some of the values that are held by software engineering.

It’s obviously dependent on the domain and solution, but if your software can be extremely rapidly rearranged, bugs found and fixed with little effort, and features added with only a minimum prompt, I think the entire definition of technical debt has changed. I’ve been sceptical of these tools and still approach their output with caution. I also worry that, as a software developer, if more can be accomplished in less time there will be less room on this planet for software developers.

You could have multiple computers, checkouts, or worktrees pointing at the same branch

Likely the value of his boss’s stock options leading up to their IPO.

Then I have bad news for you about a large chunk of both open and closed source development today.

We also don’t know if it was “unleashed”. Claude will add a co-author line to your commit even if you just ask it to author or touch up your commit message or clean up your branch’s commit history or any of a number of things that result in the creation of a commit, even if it touched none of the code. This functionality actually saves me a ton of time and results in higher quality commit structure and messages.

Has this specific issue actually been tied to misuse of Claude?

I’m sure Airbnb operators get comfortable turning it over every few days without having to constantly take photos. Most guests don’t bring robots in to smash up the dishwasher and dent the walls

They’ve historically had eye watering regular maintenance bills, even outside of them generally having a reputation for being temperamental. Maybe Ferrari will continue pioneering in their own way and make an unreliable and expensive to own EV

The price for that storage system will be far more dominated by drive prices than by the cost of the NAS box itself. Drive prices have approximately doubled in my area vs. 2 years ago.

This is also generally a selfish attitude where you personally benefit while structures that used to benefit society at large are eroded.

Openly admitting he’ll be wasting taxpayer time and money on frivolous proposals because he didn’t get his way through the democratic process. Thankfully the democratic process can go against him even further and remove him from office at their next opportunity and he can find somewhere else to throw a tantrum.

According to the terms it looks like you can cancel your deposit and get a full refund anytime, even after you’re offered to buy the phone.

The problem with auto compaction is that you aren’t given the opportunity to review its compacted understanding to confirm that it’s correct or doesn’t contain large omissions. I try to avoid letting it compact whenever possible and stick to plans that I review because it seems to get extremely dumb after an auto compaction.

What are they blacklisted from exactly? The benefit you get from them forcing vendors to make their software more secure?

To be clear, the vulnerability existed in Linux, not in Xint Code. It existed whether this group disclosed it or not. Knowledge of it and exploits may have already been bought and sold among various groups with various motives including crime, terrorism, or cyberwarfare who likely made good money off it if this happened.

In that world, the vulnerability has more value to those who seek to exploit it for their own motives, regardless of the consequences. They hope that no one else stumbles on it and fixes it, preventing them from continuing to use it to do bad things.

In the world where it is disclosed, there is more value in fixing the vulnerability as the maintainer’s reputation is at risk (and potentially monetary loss or legal liability if they are shown to be negligent).

Where do you suggest they should have kept up on this disclosure?

Meta and their employees have spent years breaking the public’s trust over and over again. Why should we trust anything they say?

Years ago I went to WWDC, to the sessions where you could talk to specialists from their different libraries. I talked to someone high up in maps and location services, reporting an issue we were consistently seeing in geolocation at a particular spot in the world. They effectively told me they didn’t believe me and that it works fine for them.