HN user

baobrien

477 karma
Posts1
Comments164
View on HN

yeah, most of the kernel maintainers in that thread seem to be against it. bcachefs does seem to also have a non-code-generating implementation of this, as it runs on architectures other than x86-64.

I don't think running on a bunch of CPU architectures is really unique to NeXT. Windows NT ran/runs on x86, Arm, Alpha, MIPS, Itanium, and PowerPC, all with a desktop as a full-blown product. Forms of desktop Linux will run on all of those and more.

They weren't based on the same novel -- but the novels "Fail Safe" and "Red Alert" were similar enough, and the release dates of "Fail Safe" and "Dr. Strangelove" were so close that Peter George and Stanley Kubrick sued the author and production of Fail Safe over copyright. In the eventual settlement, Columbia Pictures bought and distributed Fail Safe.

[I'm basing this on a reading of Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fail_Safe_(1964_film)#Lawsuit ]

[dead] 4 years ago

This poster's whole submission history is a little bizarre; Three pieces of blogspam from "Thomas Blobaum" and one thing related to the "Nebraska Blackshirts", a part of a US college football team.

Nowadays, mechanization and automation make large-scale nuclear first strikes pretty much pointless. Add to that the improvements in missile defense and the result is a different scenario. If we ever see nuclear weapons used in anger again it will probably take the form of artillery used against armored formations, fleets, and satellites.

I don't think BMD has really improved enough in the last 40 years to make "limited nuclear war" (at least between the US and Russia or maybe China) a real possibility. I also can't find, in my 30 minutes of research, anything supporting the idea that the US/NATO has any small tactical nuclear devices hanging around anymore.

AFAIK, SiFives business is about selling their RISC-V cores and ASIC consulting services. RISC-V is still kind of new as far as hard silicon Linux-capable cores go. My understanding is that this thing is meant to serve as a dev kit for their U74 core and U740 SoC platform, provide hardware for interested-enough Linux kernel devs and distro maintainers, and serve as a real, up-for-sale RISC-V board with a real SoC, 'all the fixins', and no FPGA. That's to say it's not a board for people who'd otherwise buy a RasPI or slightly more expensive SBC -- It's closer to a proof of concept.

For anybody else wanting to do this, you'd be better off picking up a Grandstream 80X ATA. It supports pulse dialing, pulse to tone conversion, 'high power' ringing, and decently modern TLS. If you're good with a soldering iron and have a 3.3v TTL serial cable, you can also pick up really cheap used Vonage HT802s and 'unlock' them.