HN user
Here for peace.
https://laura.fm
The author addresses this, no?
But I did notice an immediate change, especially with words like “traffic.” Traffic makes me feel like I’m just throwing out flypaper and measuring whatever sticks. When I describe website visitors as “readers,” it reminds me that these are real people who have literally billions of other things they could be reading that day, but they’re choosing to spend some of their limited time with me.
Indeed, and I said I stopped using the tool in the comment I made.
Eh, the rendering of Claude Code is genuinely such a mess. I have quit claude code over it because when used as a terminal in PHPStorm it sometimes gets so bad that it becomes hard to use.
This isn't a minor nitpick, it's a pretty major UX issue.
Not saying it's like a massive business downside because I'm just one of a few users, maybe this affects their bottom line a little bit, but probably not by much.
Regardless, switching to pi has been a nice breath of fresh air. It just renders well and smoothly and handles terminal resizes well, which is especially important when used in a terminal window in PHPStorm.
Love it! If this works well I'm going to add it to my basic linux tools toolkit next to htop and the like.
Oh I really like this! The one counterargument that comes to mind is when I think about the likes of C++, where there are many editions and they can be confusing to keep track of.
I'm not sure if you'd want to set one edition in stone every year. Perhaps every 3 years? Or 5 years? Especially for a long-term project like SQLite, that sounds perfectly acceptable!
All girls or most girls?
I definitely know some girls who'd love this, and see this as having fun.
I am so, so happy to see real art for once? It looks great.
You should add a scoreboard! I got zanagram #5 in 3 minutes and 53 seconds. Also found two bonus words
I thought I was slow but now I see others took 10 minutes and 20 minutes! Maybe I'm not so slow!
Zanagrams #5 Complete in 03:53 https://zanagrams.com/
Qwen 3.6 27B performs similarly to sonnet 4.5 (note I said 4.5, not 4.6) when it comes to coding. It runs amazingly well on my PC with a 7900xtx.
It's worse at general tasks, but in the precise domain of coding I actually prefer to use it over my claude subscription because it has 0 latency (and no privacy concerns whatsoever).
They look cool, but it is known that they don't add much.
In Obsidian, the local graph has real uses, but the global one is mostly to see structure in your notes and look cool on social media.
I was researching and prototyping a graph like Obsidian's before Obsidian came out, based on the ideas in "how to take smart notes"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6yUA46ek6M
I believe the direction of UI I was exploring there has more than what graphs currently have, although I didn't have the time to build it out and I saw that the site has been offline for a while.
It was a working tool though.
Do you not think that solutions to erdos problems might end up stepping stones to other important problems?
Either by introducing new tools, or by proving things that were previously unproven that end up helping in unexpected ways?
That's often how math goes, isn't it?
reMarkable is doing a decent job, their first generation device launched in 2017. Still getting updates. It is discontinued for sale, but there is no reason to believe reMarkable will stop updating their other devices if they're _still_ updating a device they don't even sell anymore.
On top of that, their aftermarket and open source situation is pretty good.
They're not ideal e-readers though, but if you're in the market for a good e-ink device with long-term support and that works well with calibre? Might be worth a look.
There is no hallucination benchmark currently.
I was researching how to predict hallucinations using the literature (fastowski et al, 2025) (cecere et al, 2025) and the general-ish situation is that there are ways to introspect model certainty levels by probing it from the outside to get the same certainty metric that you _would_ have gotten if the model was trained as a bayesian model, ie, it knows what it knows and it knows what it doesn't know.
This significantly improves claim-level false-positive rates (which is measured with the AUARC metric, ie, abstention rates; ie have the model shut up when it is actually uncertain).
This would be great to include as a metric in benchmarks because right now the benchmark just says "it solves x% of benchmarks", whereas the real question real-world developers care about is "it solves x% of benchmarks *reliably*" AND "It creates false positives on y% of the time".
So the answer to your question, we don't know. It might be a cherry picked result, it might be fewer hallucinations (better metacognition) it might be capability to solve more difficult problems (better intelligence).
The benchmarks don't make this explicit.
This sounds lovely! This definitely sounds like the kind of thing that would really work well to let all the stresses of the everyday wash off!
It reminds me a lot of the YouTube channel "life in jars", he normally makes videos about microbiology and freshwater ecology in... jars!
But on top of that he also had a short series on gaining the trust of and befriending crows in his city.
Good incentive for me to try this out!
Cerebras?
I wrote a program that has programmable brushes about ten years ago, it's a bit different from moss in that it has a physics simulation underneath rather than a sort of shader, but I've always thought this kind of approach has a lot of potential.
It feels _amazing_ to draw a bird in a single stroke!
Maybe this can give you some inspiration!
Sorry but what do you mean crystal clear requirements?
I don't particularly think "y7u8888888ftrg34BC" would pass as a crystal clear requirement at my workplace :<
Do you mean something different?
If I understand the author correctly, he chose the hyperbolic model specifically because the story of "the singularity" _requires_ a function that hits infinity.
He's looking for a model that works for the story in the media and runs with it.
Your criticism seems to be criticizing the story, not the author's attempt to take it "seriously"
My friend, this is amazing, Thank you!
I made a service to sync remarkable to obsidian. It's not free, but it _is_ open-source so you can self-host for free.
This is being actively researched (in the open!). https://github.com/open-spaced-repetition/srs-benchmark
I would love to have a nix flake to install it easily with nix! Given it's built in bash that should be basically no issue whatsoever.
Thanks a lot for this! I was interested in beads but found the author's approach to software development quite erratic and honestly a bit unprofessional. Yes, LLMs are great, but no they shouldn't be the lead developer.
Beads is an incredibly difficult-to-follow mess for something that is at its core a pretty simple idea. You distilled it to its core, I will absolutely be checking this out :)
A new kind of science is one of my favorite books, I read the entirety of the book during a dreadful vacation when I was 19 or 20 on an iPod touch.
It goes much beyond just cellular automata, the thousand pages or so all seem to drive down the same few points:
- "I, Stephen Wolfram, am an unprecedented genius" (not my favorite part of the book) - Simple rules lead to complexity when iterated upon - The invention of field of computation is as big and important of an invention as the field of mathematics
The last one is less explicit, but it's what I took away from it. Computation is of course part of mathematics, but it is a kind of "live" mathematics. Executable mathematics.
Super cool book and absolutely worth reading if you're into this kind of thing.
S-expressions are indisputably harder to learn to read.
Has this been studied? This is a very strong claim to make without any references.
What if you take two groups of software developers, one which has 5-10 years of experience in a popular language of choice, let's say C, and then take a group of people who write LISP professionally (maybe clojure? Common lisp? Academics who work with scheme/racket?) and then have scientists who know how to evaluate cognitive effort measure the difference in reading difficulty.
Isn't the space you're talking about the input images that are close to the textual prompt?
These models are trained on image+text pairs. So if you prompt something like "an apple" you get a conceptual average of all images containing apples. Depending on your dataset, it's likely going to be a photograph of an apple in the center.
Luckily I work with laravel and that's a spiritual successor to rails.
The development experience is almost always really smooth and there are more and more tools to further smoothen that experience every day.
There are definitely better tools out there but given how the web ecosystem functions, it could be much worse.
I've been watching weird explorer for years and I had never considered I didn't know his name. I had _no_ idea he's caled Jared Rydelek!
His videos are incredibly interesting and fascinating
Given the popularity and activity and pace of innovation seen on /r/LocalLLaMa, I do think models will keep improving. Likely not at the same pace as they are today, but those people love tinkering but it's mostly enthusiasts with a budget for a fancy setup in a garage, independent researchers and smaller businesses doing research there.
These people won't sit still and models will keep getting better as well as cheaper to run.
I don't understand what the difference between a simulation and a test is?
Your url doesn't work, I can't read the article