Is the author even aware of C tooling?
HN user
awson
C++ killed off some of C's killer low-level features like type-punning via unions
Yet all major C++ compilers support it.
I just glanced at it, but in "Rust supports cross-language link-time optimization between C/C++ and Rust" it's not Rust but LLVM.
Any languages with LLVM backends get cross-language LTO for free.
Have they ever tried Zig Bun with LTO?
NTFS is case sensitive.
If on WSL2, they need
[interop]
appendWindowsPath=false
section in /etc/wsl.conf.
Then everything will go flawlessly.
Absolutely.
Quite a long time ago I was working on a some business application's reporting facility.
It used to take about an hour, and my development reduced this time to a 1 or 2 seconds ballpark.
This was HUGE. And changed the way users create these reports forever.
AFAUI, this extension uses proprietary C++ front-end commercially licensed from EDG.
The same front-end powers their Visual Studio IDE (not Code).
Also, AFAIK, there exist an alternative `clangd`-based C++ extension, which is fully open-source (but I could be wrong).
And using `libgit2`, written in C, for heavy-lifting.
The very existence of Far Manager makes me stay on Windows.
"wouldn't necessarily be able"
It goes completely against the most (perhaps) fundamental part of C++ philosophy of overloading functions on argument types.
This.