HN user

award_

234 karma
Posts2
Comments44
View on HN

If this was a legit study I'd expect an arXiv link or similar instead. Looking at their methodology, it's vague enough to be interpreted as 'ok' but really I'd expect ALOT more information on their sample distributions, weighting done to that sample for comparison, etc. It skimps on all the actual details. Seems like clickbaity junk to me, but I'm open to the idea that there is meaningful studies to be had here on this subject, or that this was done in a proper way but was communicated poorly.

  Reviews.org surveyed 1,000 Americans 18 years and older with a +/- 4% margin of error and a confidence level of 95%. The survey results were weighted to reflect characteristics of the United States population using available data from the US census. Respondents were asked to refer to their phone’s screen time report to determine the average number of times per day they check their phones, in addition to how much time in total they spend on their phones per day.

Lots of limitations here but they do offer an 'ask' button under some circumstances: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/14110396?hl=en

I've found it to be helpful in getting quicker information out of some 'review' style videos, where I can ask a few pointed questions and get answers faster than the narrator can get to that info. I hadn't found it to be wrong in my few attempts with it, but ymmv

I've seen this come up here and elsewhere before, always very cool! I always wonder who's actually using it for production workloads, in what context, etc.

It feels like so much of the world focuses on docker images that alternatives are pretty hard to get going.

Crazy that it's still down. I posted about it when it first happened: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37917050

From the original:

The following services were marked as having issues after the Kansas Court cyberattack –

* Kansas District Court Public Access

* Appellate Case Inquiry System

* Kansas Attorney Registration

* Kansas online marriage license applications

* Central payment center in the Office of Judicial Administration

* Kansas eCourt Case Management System

* Kansas Protection Order Portal

* Kansas Court eFiling

I'm not sure why they wouldn't have been able to turn things around a lot faster, but maybe they're taking their time for some reason.

ChatGPT4 regularly answers questions for me, summarizes web content, etc while providing linked sources. Saying it doesn't provide links to sources is not accurate. On the other hand, Bard usually (tho admittedly not always) directs me to use Google search for the latest information.

The following services were marked as having issues after the Kansas Court cyberattack –

* Kansas District Court Public Access

* Appellate Case Inquiry System

* Kansas Attorney Registration

* Kansas online marriage license applications

* Central payment center in the Office of Judicial Administration

* Kansas eCourt Case Management System

* Kansas Protection Order Portal

* Kansas Court eFiling

This was my take away as well. I see a lot of imaginary, proposed future problems and no concrete issues that this is currently trying to solve. It gives the impression that it's just being put out there to muddy the waters and give some credence to an otherwise awful barrier to entry for the web.

I just got into 3d printing as a hobby a few months ago and this has been my take away from their offerings as well. I use TinkerCad for most things; I'd like to get into Fusion 360, but I'd be a little afraid of learning a bunch about that software only to have more and more of it become out of reach behind licenses that don't make a lot of sense to buy as a hobbyist. That said, the products look great and seem to have everything a creator might want, so it definitely makes sense for pro shops to license and use.