avian

Maybe someone that has seen this first hand can chime in but I strongly suspect the real-life effect viewed with naked eye is much more disappointing compared to what is shown in this video. Real physics ain't need to get them likes and subscribes.

Each time I see beauty in old machinery I think about the recent IEEE article that started with something like "AI designs aren't limited by outdated concepts like simplicity and aesthetics." and remember that there is someone that goes to a museum and sees inefficiences and time wasted on unnecessary detail instead of inspiration.

In related news, Imgur seems to be a/b testing a website that just pushes you to the mobile app and doesn't allow you do anything in browser beyond viewing the one picture you clicked the link for.

Freed from intelligibility and aesthetics, AI designs faster

I like this headline. In other words, AI will suck out every last bit that makes engineering fun.

I know, I know. The job is to make money for your employer not have fun. AI makes money faster so shut up and do your job.

But fuck, I took this career because I found joy in understanding things and making things that look and work well.

The Compaq laptop I was using had a 486SX and 4 MB of RAM. It had a 640x480 (if I remember correctly) screen and I'm pretty sure the framebuffer was in a separate video RAM that was not counted in that 4 MB. Used to type a lot of LaTeX on that laptop and used X11 for previews - xfree86 even had a special driver for the specific video hardware that laptop had. Not sure if I used a window manager. I think I just pointed ghostscript at the X11 screen from a text-mode console.

I just spent the better part of the week looking at code. I guess I'm the last one.

I hope it stays like that for a while, but I suspect it won't.

Advertised prices for my setup are now roughly 2x what I'm currently paying.

It's the tragedy of the commons. It's a complete non-issue for the offender because it's very unlikely they will face any consequences and less of a non-issue for their neighbor who suddenly can only receive this guy's Spotify on every channel instead of the public broadcast they wanted to listen (maybe exaggerating a bit, depending on the FM transmitter gizmo used, but maybe now it's all buried in noise when it was clear previously). Even the "size of a wedding reception" can cover several homes in a dense apartment block.

But don't underestimate the stubbornness and time some people can dedicate to complaining to authorities. You might have a neighbor that will send letters about how they have to pay mandatory monthly bills for the national public broadcast they now can't listen to. They will complain and complain enough that eventually the broadcaster will send someone over with a spectrum analyzer and then the ball starts rolling. There have been court cases over stuff like that in this corner of Europe.

But I agree, you can argue those offenders went out of their way to cause trouble. In the cases I read people kept doing stupid things even after several warnings and apparently only got their lesson only when dragged into court.

Here in Germany you have to be careful when setting up a homemade radio signal - it might be illegal depending on frequency and transmit power.

In Germany and everywhere else. The difference is how much it's enforced.

Note that this project isn't using that horrible Raspberry Pi GPIO PWM hack that shits all over RF but an off-the-shelf low power car FM transmitter product. I guess if someone knocks on your door you can point your finger to whoever in Germany sold you that.

I think solid state technology came too soon for the miniaturization of vacuum tube technology to be fully explored. Ken mentions in one of his older posts that even in these old tube-based IBM computers a lot of digital logic was in fact already done with semiconductor diodes, not vacuum tubes. Optimizations like the nuvistors never took off because semiconductors were already more economic.

I guess you could do a whole circuit on photo-etched or stamped sheet metal inside a glass envelope in a similar process that VFDs, although I don't know how you would implement cathode heating. It would be an interesting exercise to think where that could lead you, but I think modern VFDs date much later, when semiconductors already wholly replaced tubes in digital logic.

What fails in a tube is usually the heater filament, which is a wear part with a limited life. Where some (very) expensive tubes did go is to have replaceable heaters - so not more but less integration.

Yes, this was weird.

I saw that announcement yesterday, went through the list of fixed issues and decided to wait with the upgrade since none of them were relevant for me.

If I haven't just seen this on the second page of HN I would have probably deferred this upgrade for a few more days.

This one provides the source and asks you to build it yourself so at least it has some credibility for the "education use only" claim.

I've seen similar things posted on here before that had a binary build only and zero technical documentation. It was really hard to see any kind of research or education value in those.

Because this is getting downvoted, and to check if my memory serves me well:

Here's an excerpt from a 2013 article in Scientific American that appears on the first page of results when searching for "voyager left the solar system" [1]:

Voyager 1 was starting to get a reputation as the spacecraft that cried wolf, after scientists repeatedly claimed it was leaving the solar system, only to change their minds and say it wasn’t quite there yet.

[1] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/voyager-1-leaves-...

Not to detract from the amazing success that is Voyager - I also still remember attending a lecture given by a JPL engineer that worked on one of the instruments - but I feel like the "Voyager has reached interstellar space" thing has been milked to death by PR. There was a period where I feel like there was one such announcement published in media each month with very unsatisfactory explanation (if any) how it differs from the last one.

Thanks. It might still turn out to be this.

My thinking so far against was 1) after a few months I'm pretty sure I would hear about the real attack 2) Repeating too frequently. People aren't getting hacked all the time (I hope).

But who knows? Now I'm thinking that maybe some other step in the attack is failing and maybe the attackers just trigger the email bomb part pre-emptively in case they actually succeed in resetting the password/purchasing/whatever.

I just block the group address on the MTA, but it doesn't matter. In all instances so far when it came to my attention the group was already deleted. Next time they will use a different group and I don't want to blanket ban all Google Group mail for my users.

It's not even that much of a hassle. What worries me is that I don't understand why someone would go through the trouble of doing this for no apparent benefit. I hope I'm not somehow unknowingly enabling some sort of an attack on any of the entities sending these automated replies.

Somewhat related to spam coming from Google servers, maybe someone can shed some light on what could be the motivation behind this activity:

In recent months I'm seeing instances where random personal mail accounts on a server I run would receive a barrage of mail in a short amount of time.

Mail seems to be bounced via Google Groups - they are sent from Google's IPs and have headers like X-Google-Group-Id, List-*, etc. all pointing to Google Groups. The actual group ID changes after each individual instance of this. However when I actually check e.g. the List-Archive URL, the group appears to be already been deleted.

The content of mail looks like it originates from various (legit-looking) random public web services, support requests, issue trackers, web contact forms etc. For example, a common reoccurring one is Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles (as in something like "thank you for filing a document #123 with us").

No apparent phishing links, no attached malware, no short advertisements snuck into a text field etc. Just automated replies from "noreply@"-type addresses.

It does not seem to be the case of trying to hide another attack (as discussed here for example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47609882) - over many instances I've not seen any other malicious activity. And this mail is filtered out easily enough based on Google's headers.

It all looks like there is some bot that a) creates a Google group and subscribes (one or more) random email addresses to a Google group and then b) enters the group's mail address into a bunch of random web forms that then send their automated responses to the group.

What could be the motivation for this? After the fact it's filtered pretty easily based on headers. It's not nearly enough volume to DoS the server. But why would someone go through the trouble of setting this up?

Recipient: Google LLC

This complaint was sent to Google, probably because the cloudinary.com URL appeared in their search results.

It's doubtful anyone at Fiverr was made aware of this - unless Google typically forwards these complaints to the actual host of the offending URL. Even then, it would go to Cloudinary who would in turn need to notify their client. Many hops with plenty of "someone else's problem" barriers for the message to overcome.

Wiring mistakes can kill or burn down a house months or years after they have been done. You will not notice unconnected protective earth or badly dimensioned circuit breakers until something else breaks and the protective element is not there.

To keep a sending IP “warm” and maintain deliverability, you’re expected to send constantly. Like… all the time.

The article provides zero evidence for this claim except "our low-volume (by their own measure) marketing campaign gets marked as spam by gmail".

use actual google tools to see actual reputation

Google has a v2 of the postmaster tools that are actually useful now? Awesome news! I totally missed that.

All v1 ever showed me as a small-time mail server admin was equivalent to "nothing to see here".

But v2 now actually shows me things like compliance status and user reported spam rate for my domains.

Probably not on Steam, but maybe still somewhere on the net. There used to be an open source game for unix-like systems simply called "atc" that gave you a text-mode view of a radar screen. You gave directions to pilots using the keyboard through some abbreviated text instructions. I know because it was pretty popular among some friends of mine back in the day.

I made a patch that made it a multiplayer networked game where each player controlled the space of one airport. When I was doing that I remember being surprised how the entire game was written as a parser in lex (or maybe yacc? not sure anymore) not straight C.

I'm reminded of something I've read somewhere "Nothing is more boring than listening about someone else's dreams".

I think it tells a lot about AI-generated art. People prompting the AI find it fascinating because they look at it with in the context of their internal thoughts and moods that led them to it. But the generated artwork itself doesn't communicate that context at all. A complete stranger will find it derivative and boring.

I'm guessing that looking at AI art prompted by your friend and family may be a middle road somewhere. So maybe the fact that you have such a positive opinion on AI art is because it's the people you know closely that are doing it.

No idea about Upwork, but I had about the same situation about some other company sending me mail I cared about for a reason and their mail was not getting delivered to me because their DMARC check was failing.

They said "thanks, we'll look into it" and kept sending broken mail for years.

My guess is if you're a big enough player Google learns to ignore your broken DMARC config or somebody knows somebody on the inside who can add an exception. And then your mail gets delivered to @gmail.com just fine and that means it's working and wtf is this guy complaining about.

Just this morning I opened up my RSS reader and found that it was flooded by weird, twisty prose exalting the virtues of online gambling. Since I follow a few blogs that post long form content I first thought this was satire or something, but after reading for a bit and seeing that the posts just never end my best guess was it's just AI slop indented to drive traffic to some gambling site - not clear which since there were not links. All posts came from a RSS feed of an apparently abandoned tech blog I was following that had the last legit post in 2020. My guess is the domain expired, a squatter bought it, saw a bunch of requests for the RSS feed and grabbed the opportunity. Although to what end I'm not sure.

We solved this at our startup by running names through a simple LLM filter - if the name is gibberish like Px2846skxojw just block the signup.

I hope "LLM thinks your name is gibberish" won't become the new "your name can't include invalid characters".

The goal [...] to flood the victim’s inbox with so much noise that they can’t find the emails that actually matter.

While the victim is drowning [...] the attacker is doing something else.

In the past months some personal mail accounts on a mail server I administer were victim of something that looked similar to what's described here.

Hundreds of mails apparently originating from various (legit-looking) random public web services, support requests, issue trackers, web contact forms etc. For example, a good part of them was from Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles (as in something like "thank you for filing a document #123 with us").

To make things even weirder, they were not sent directly to the address, but according to message headers were bounced through Google Groups (each time I checked the relevant group was already deleted). So as far as I can tell it was not the mail address hosted on my server that was being entered into those websites.

No phishing links, no attached malware, no short advertisements snuck into a text field etc. Just a huge amount of automated replies from "noreply@" legit entities.

I've seen several of these attacks and spent some time investigating them. To my knowledge these were not associated with any other malicious activity, like the author of the article mentions. If anything they were just a denial-of-service attack on a mail box (as in, making the human user trawl through garbage, the mail volume was far from saturating the server itself). What exactly would be a motivation for that I can't tell, except making the life of a small mail server admin even harder than it already is.

I suspect the text comes directly from some poorly OCR'd article since it's full of such errors.

In theory we could have a popup box that tells you that both your computer and other device support higher speeds/more power, but your cable is limiting it.

I'm pretty sure my old Dell XPS laptop with Windows 10 had pop-ups just like this.

"This device can run faster" or something.

https://xcancel.com/heynavtoor/status/2037638554374099409