HN user

asdfzxc

19 karma
Posts1
Comments29
View on HN
How to Hide $400M 10 years ago

I didn't quite understand this bit, where she discovers all these papers and laptops full of important documents and then just leaves to take a walk!

Let citizens have the "Society" app on their phones and let them up/down vote serious things too

r/writing prompts had a scenario like that. Where a nuke is incoming and a majority of the citizenry has to approve a retaliatory strike, via an app of course.

Also, I'm hitting myself in the face right now.

A few years back body hair was considered attractive, and now it's not (or maybe it is, I haven't kept track). This change in preferences was within a span of 20 years. So I don't find it surprising that a strong neanderthal man or woman would have been attractive to our ancestors.

I loved Kat and have used it countless times to get things I can't afford or just can't buy even if I could because of where I live. I wish the founder hadn't got caught.

That being said, the point of punishing criminals is to punish crime, not to end it. El Chapo is a violent criminal. It is extremely optimistic to think that putting him in jail ends drug trade. The point is to punish the crimes that he had committed.

Finally, I agree that torrents will exist for a long time to come. And thank God for that.

But the article makes the case that just acquiring the skill set isn't enough. There are prohibitive costs involved if you want to legally use those skills professionally.

Obviously there is a case of the grass being greener on the other side here, though.

Consumers in India want the quality assurance and standardization of services, that American regulation ensures to a certain extent.

Andresson basically tweeted colonialism is good for India. How can someone, especially someone from India, just agree to disagree on that. That is like saying one can make racist, sexist remarks and the people who were offended can just agree to disagree on that. At least the guy made his viewpoint public.

Besides isn't it the intolerant who shape the society around them. If one wants a community whose members aren't ignorant or bigoted, why would just a live and let live approach shape the community to one's desires?

In cases like this, there is clearly a time limit, a very short time limit, where any information thus retrieved would be useful, and life saving. It is the officers' duty to use whatever means, within limits, to get the information out of the suspect. Also the evidence on scene is very strong, the suspect is in fact the perpetrator of said crime.

In case of terror suspects, quite a few have emerged innocent which is quite embarrassing in the first place, but understandable. Also, one should question the relevance of any information retrieved after long sustained periods of torture when surely facts on the ground have probably changed significantly.

Moreover this person, in the stanford thing, is a petty thief who is quite likely to fold under pressure since the crime has manageable consequences for him, and he doesn't possess training and motivation to withhold info at all costs. This trait wouldn't be present in case of some death cult, military, or even a serious gang member.

The point is, it isn't correct to make blanket statements like torture wouldn't work, ever. But the prevalence of incidences where some force might work shouldn't be used to justify comic levels torture demonstrated in the recent cases.

And finally, One might however see value in the dampening effect torture has on enemy morale. However, you can't play both sides, pretend to be a great champion of human rights and values and continue to come up with hilariously OTT torture routines. That is the problem US & Allies face regarding this whole torture debate/narrative. You have to own up to the uh assholery.

Funny I came across this line recently, in an article about trading terminals like the ones manufactured by Bloomberg etc. Maybe this guy's company is offering something to that effect - A glorified Data visualization software? (edit: Bloomberg's offering probably has much more value) It's a pretty smart move.

This is exactly what I wanted to ask. The article only mentions things like "a company did so and so" etc. Other than big companies like Netflix closing down their in house data center operations, which has been in the news lately and companies like Uber running entirely off Salesforce, I've not heard of major decline in IT outsourcing activities.