Lol, what?
So were you able to find a "academic source" that audited the media in this way?
HN user
Lol, what?
So were you able to find a "academic source" that audited the media in this way?
Exactly who else is going to cover the % of negative media coverage on Trump, in your mind, other than a "right wing" source?
Also, you're completely wrong about Fox. I don't generally watch mainstream news period, but one day it was on in a hotel, and like you, I expected neutral to positive coverage on Trump.
It was just the opposite, like 20 minutes straight of "Russia Gate," just endlessly hyping up and trying to validate the scandal. If Fox is a friend of Trump's, he doesn't need enemies.
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2019/11/12/i...
96% Negative Spin from the main 3 networks.
Silent on Economic Success: Despite record highs in the stock market and a fifty-year low in the unemployment rate, the President’s handling of the economy was given a stingy 4 minutes, 6 seconds of airtime during these six weeks, or less than one percent of all Trump administration news (645 minutes).
No, it's nothing new... here is an article about the same thing from 2017... unless they have changed, BLM is a separatist movement.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/07/black-lives-matter-ra...
Imagine using your career position as a platform to argue that Black Americans should use “separate but equal” facilities in 2020.
Isn't that one of the core tenants of the BLM campaigns? "Separate but equal" community policing for African American neighborhoods..
You're free to register transwomen-are-men.com or get-the-blm-facts.com
For now... there have been other domains whose registrars have been repeatedly banned / revoked for "hate speech", Daily Stormer comes to mind.
Well, sorry, I don't know anything about native American reservations... but I assume people just can't move into them willy nilly.
Dumb question... but can I still move to Tulsa?
He's obviously mocking the use of the word... can people here not understand context?
Agreed. The reason its not that way is that schools are mostly state-run daycare programs, setup so that parents can work, not a genuine implementation of skill building.
Got popular in 2005 - 2006 in California
We definitely know different groups of people.
From the get go, it was estimated that 80% of the world population would be infected within 18-24 months.
All the shutdown was intended to do was to "slow the spread" from the 18 months to 24 months, and to hopefully keep hospitals from being overwhelmed.
Once we knew how infectious it was, Covid was always expected to infect nearly everyone eventually, whether the economy was shut down or not.
If you start posting substantive points arguing against socialism / big government you get warned. If you argue about the warning you get banned.
YC is not really any better and the main mod is a self-admitted (although he took it down now) far leftist.
One time I found all the UBI threads and every flagged / mod warned post was someone arguing against UBI (that’s apparent a flame war), but endless idealistic rambling about how great it would be was totally fine.
If you follow spez at all that shouldn’t surprise you.
Hell he directly edited the comment database on the_donald one time
I met him years ago, he was never ok
You literally can’t debate any controversial issue / cultural topic without it being called “hate” now...
You mean it's fine to let some groups get away with much more, out of guilt.
So you know who you're talking to?
Mhm.. yeah I've never been able to follow that line of reasoning.
I'm a gay person and if I call someone the f-word I would generally mean it as a slur / insult.
Bigotry / offensive words doesn't just lose meaning because you're a minority.
In restaurants I worked in a long time ago, servers would just call black people "Canadians" -- for instance, "Nope, don't sit those Canadians in my section, they don't tip."
Good luck filtering for stuff like that. And even if you did, people would just come up with new version.
Re: The core problem... Why would having extreme right wingers use your site even be a problem? Presumably extreme left wingers are okay?
Pretty gross to respond that only people on the right use "slurs," after being given several examples of why various minorities would want to use them.
I'm pretty sure the n-word is used a lot more by black people than by "right wingers"
Considering that politicians / law-makers / the state are allowed to use violence to enforce laws, it's an absurd policy to say that Trump can't threaten violence on twitter.
We can't force drug users to not own drugs
Sure you can, and we do all the time, we lock them in cages.
Realty.com on a iPhone XR
After watching that video, it seems like you could just mulch large areas of "dry land" and it would have a similar effect more quickly. The pruning (and rotting of the wood) is what is fixing the soil right?
By hording the wealth you mean drastically increasing GDP?
Have you tested this hypothesis? It seems that South Africa is wealthier than neighbors, for instance.
Just wait until PCG exits bankruptcy this week! It'll probably get swarmed by investors trying to "buy the dip", even though the shares are very diluted now