HN user

ascuttlefish

499 karma
Posts53
Comments147
View on HN
www.scientificamerican.com 12y ago

The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens

ascuttlefish
2pts0
www.slate.com 12y ago

History.exe: How can we preserve software for historians of tomorrow?

ascuttlefish
4pts0
www.theverge.com 14y ago

Not fade away: on living, dying, and the digital afterlife

ascuttlefish
2pts0
www.technologyreview.com 14y ago

The Curious Case of Internet Privacy

ascuttlefish
1pts0
www.npr.org 14y ago

Where Is Now? The Paradox Of The Present

ascuttlefish
2pts0
www.businessweek.com 14y ago

Why It's Hard to Replicate Silicon Valley's Successes Abroad

ascuttlefish
3pts0
www.telegraph.co.uk 15y ago

We'd be lost without them: meet the team behind GPS

ascuttlefish
2pts0
www.prospectmagazine.co.uk 15y ago

Two decades of the web: a utopia no longer

ascuttlefish
4pts1
www.guardian.co.uk 15y ago

How can we corral data to reveal the big picture?

ascuttlefish
1pts0
www.hxa.name 15y ago

Tractatus Digito-Philosophicus: Wittgenstein for software development

ascuttlefish
1pts0
www.newscientist.com 15y ago

US inventors on their marks for race to patent office

ascuttlefish
2pts0
www.freedomboxfoundation.org 15y ago

The FreedomBox Foundation

ascuttlefish
6pts1
discovermagazine.com 15y ago

The Mathematics of Terrorism

ascuttlefish
3pts0
www.economist.com 15y ago

AI may be better than natural intelligence at coping with battlefield chaos

ascuttlefish
22pts27
www.globalpost.com 15y ago

The internet’s new billion in Brazil and China are changing Internet culture

ascuttlefish
1pts0
www.technologyreview.com 15y ago

Robotic Limbs that Plug into the Brain

ascuttlefish
2pts0
books.google.com 15y ago

Popular Science: Every issue from May 1872 to March 2009 online

ascuttlefish
47pts12
www.nytimes.com 15y ago

HTML 5: New Web Code Draws Concern Over Risks to Privacy

ascuttlefish
3pts0
www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca 15y ago

Young, male, testosterone-fuelled CEOs more likely to start or drop deals

ascuttlefish
3pts3
fair-use.org 15y ago

Phantom by Max Planck

ascuttlefish
2pts0
www.nytimes.com 15y ago

In a Video Game, Tackling the Complexities of Protein Folding

ascuttlefish
2pts0
duckduckgo.com 15y ago

Integrating DuckDuckGo and Wolfram Alpha: regular expressions

ascuttlefish
2pts0
www.yesmagazine.org 16y ago

Time for a Tech Sabbath?

ascuttlefish
2pts0
esciencenews.com 16y ago

Online ads can get too close for comfort says new study

ascuttlefish
1pts0
esciencenews.com 16y ago

New software to measure emotional reactions to Web

ascuttlefish
1pts0
www.economist.com 16y ago

A game of cat and mouse: Evidence that Toxoplasmosis may affect human behaviour

ascuttlefish
26pts4
s3.amazonaws.com 16y ago

Meditation for hackers: ToorCamp '09 - Sai Emrys (saizai)

ascuttlefish
2pts1
www.telegraph.co.uk 16y ago

Robert Boyle's Wish List

ascuttlefish
1pts0
www.sciencedaily.com 16y ago

Crocodiles Ride Ocean Currents for Ocean Travel

ascuttlefish
37pts9
chronicle.com 16y ago

The Trouble With Intuition

ascuttlefish
1pts0

It's very well done, too. Great character development and a gripping story arc. From my layperson's perspective, the science of orbital debris collection is taken very seriously.

The opening sequence in the first episode powerfully illustrates the speed and devastation caused by the intersection of the orbits of a simple bolt and a passenger liner.

Thanks for the reply. I always thought the Russians had been lost more people, materiel, etc. than anyone else and were pretty much done in by the end of the war. (I'm not sure where I got that idea, now that I examine it.)

IIRC, the Soviet Union didn't test their first bomb until 1949, well after the war ended. Are you suggesting that the Soviets stopped their advance because of the American bomb?

Edit: Oh, I just noticed the bit in your comment about the 1950s/60s. So your contention is that the war might have reignited had there been no atomic bomb?

I agree with you, but practically, not all information can be kept.

There are teams of people right now deciding what is 'good' (i.e. what is kept) and what is shredded. They're called archivists, and, using their judgement in conjunction with government-created records retention schedules, they're culling both government and private records. This culled information is removed for a variety of reasons, space being one of the most prominent. By such means is the pool of available primary sources that will form the basis for future histories created by underpaid and underfunded but well-meaning bureaucrats.

Sounds like the same situation obtains not only in the dead-tree archives but also in the digital ones. Sigh. I wish people would prioritize our cultural legacy first instead of last when it comes to funding.

I read the paper editions of The Economist and Macleans and I read CBC news online and listen to the hourly news on the radio.

I've chosen a couple sources that I enjoy. I don't worry too much about missing much or whether I'm getting the whole story; I assume that what I miss will either become important enough to crop up in one of my sources or it won't and that the whole story is impossible to get.

I think the reason the slants are not very different between sources is the fundamental laziness of journalists who rely heavily on material provided by government and corporate press releases.

That is definitely one of many ways a person can self-destruct, and it is indeed related to being wealthy and perhaps famous. But there are other motives that could explain suicides that don't involve money. I'm not saying they suicidal tendencies and wealth orthogonal (disclosure: I had to look that up :), but they're not always, uh, parallel either. Say for example you have someone who's been heavily goal oriented their entire life, but when they achieve their goals--of wealth and fame, or maybe just to be a hell of an entrepreneur, or something that has a side-effect of wealth and fame--they are completely unprepared for the emptiness and lack of purpose they now face. It could be argued that they face a despair unrelated to their wealth and riches but rather to the way they structured and lived their lives. (There's some interesting passages in David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest about this.)

I don't disagree with you w/r/t wealth being a possible contributor to the motivations for suicide, but I believe that there are as many reasons a person could kill themselves as we can imagine, only some of which might involve their richness and famousness. Suicide is a dark, multi-tentacled thing.

Assuming of course that there are no specific reasons unrelated to money that could drive people to blackest despair. That a person is rich and famous is likely to be, in my humble and unexpert opinion, tangential to the problems that might make them suicidal. The tendency toward suicide is too complicated to generalize to a point about riches, I think.

I find it hard to believe that there's One Reason the rich and famous commit suicide. I think this essay reveals a fair bit more about the author and his take on richness and famousness than it does about the true motivations of the suicidal.

If you eat fortified food and get out in the sun enough, then sure, this may apply to you. But if, like me, you try not to eat food that's been heavily processed/fortified and you live where days are short in the winter, then you still might not be getting enough vitamin D in your diet. If the tests are suspect, you'll never know...

I think you've nailed it. Bill Maher asked the media '[C]ould you please stop pitting the ignorant vs. the educated and framing it as a "debate."' Acknowledging ignorant views and handling those who hold them with kids gloves is just another of many possible paths to Idiocracy.

Matterhorn: A Novel of the Vietnam War by Karl Marlantes

I'm also:

1) slowly working through F. Copleston's History of Philosophy Volume 1: Greece and Rome while reading selections of the philosophers he discusses

2) reading daily an article or piece from Lapham's Quarterly, and

3) reading almost daily 0.5-1 law from Robert Greene's 48 Laws of Power