artonge

No, as usual, don’t hate the player, hate the game. Facebook benefits from a huge network effect that locks people in if they want to keep in touch with their close ones. There is no alternative as you can't built a concurrent because facebook do not allow any interaction from the outside world. So people come to facebook to keep in touch, and stay because the content is addictive. Note that moste people are not posting, so they are not even contributing to the content. Note also that social networks are using our brain biase to keep us addicted.

Not been on facebook fore some years now, but it is not "just" a medium. It is optimized to keep you on the site as much as possible, to show you as many ads as possible. This comes with the hard price of showing you what is divisive, as it keeps you engaged. So they do are responsible for prioritizing divisive posts and allowing ads that are so well targeted that they can make you tilt.

Also:

How will Overture data be licensed?

Data contributed to ODbL licensed datasets will be contributed under both the ODbL and CDLA permissive v2. Contributions to CDLA permissive v2 datasets will be contributed under the CDLA permissive v2. How will Overture code be licensed?

Overture’s open source code will be subject to the MIT license.

ODbL: https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/

From the FAQ:

What is the relationship between Overture and OpenStreetMap?

Overture is a data-centric map project, not a community of individual map editors. Therefore, Overture is intended to be complementary to OSM. We combine OSM with other sources to produce new open map data sets. Overture data will be available for use by the OpenStreetMap community under compatible open data licenses. Overture members are encouraged to contribute to OSM directly.

Sadly, emissions taxes impact the poorest first while being almost pain free for the richest.

I've just seen your other comment:

1. Fear of meritocracy 2. Fear of countries not negotiating an equalitarian deal 3. Fear of the awful science of “that camp” (and I know exactly what 3 arguments you’ll oppose, so, don’t bother with the direct answer, please assume everything you want to answer is already understood and incorrect, and go straight to a second level of answers).

1. Meritocracy is a way to make you feel better for having more than others. In a finite world, having more than other means stealing from them. Nobody merits more than somebody else. At least not at the scale it is happening now. And don't assume that you work more than others.

2. I don't understand what you mean.

3. What is "that camp" ? What scientific studies are you talking about ?

You seem to think that you work more, or harder than other people, hence you are given more "consumption rights". Please consider that:

- A lot of people are not working to consume more, and it does not prevent them to work hard. They just aren't fulfilling themselves through consumerism. - A lot of people are working harder than you, for less. Should we take parts of your share a give it to them ? Spoiler alert, you will be constrained below 2T of CO2 emission, that's for sure, because you are not working harder than others. - In a finite world, emitting more than your share means stepping on somebody else's share. But why would have that privilege if you are not working more? - In a finite world, stepping on someone else's share that you are not permitted to take leads to a conflict. Conflict means war in a planetary context.

If I may suggest, if what's blocking you from emitting less, is your desire to consume more, you should try to change that, as your consumption capability will reduce in the future, whether you want it or not. This is because our energy sources are becoming less abundant, which means less consumption capability for the same amount of work.

You might have posted on the wrong comment because I don't think anything I wrote could have led you to believe that I am a "a passive fossil fuel lobby repeater." ;).

What the planet can absorb divided by the number of people.

Why do I have the same goal as an Indian or Nepalese person?

I do not understand, why not ?

The issue with aviation should not be framed by its share in total carbon emissions, which appears to be not that much. It's the fact that, in a world where the individual target of CO2 emissions is 2T, there is no room for aviation. Same thing for eating meat more than once a week, or using a personal car.

To evaluate your individual CO2 emissions, you can use this simulator: https://nosgestesclimat.fr

1. Replacement battery would help with reparability, which is one step toward the sobriety needed to fight climate change.

2. I feel like the customers do not have much of a choice if no product allows to replace the battery. So there is no way to vote with our wallet.

3. Which cookie disaster? I only see a directive that enforce companies to reveal when they are tracking users.

The movie is only a few years old, so drones were already a solution back then.

They did not use them because of the noise. Being filmed while climbing was already disturbing for Alex, so drones making a lot of noise was a no go.

I am not sure that I agree with you, climate change is a crisis. The time frame to act was short and we missed it. Now we can only limit the damages.

Apparently not the first time from the activity of the user:

https://github.com/Developer-Ecosystem-Engineering?tab=overv...

https://github.com/obsproject/obs-browser/pull/310

Strangely, a lot of contributions to numpy.

I would argue that wealth distribution is also a good reason to have taxes.

From the Reader:

Warning: If you want to give these dotfiles a try, you should first fork this repository, review the code, and remove things you don’t want or need. Don’t blindly use my settings unless you know what that entails. Use at your own risk!

The temperature difference from the last ice age is only 5°C. Most of northern Europe was under a glacier all year long.

Forecasts are telling us a 2°C increase before the end of the centuary is already inevitable. If we do not change anything, a 4°C increase is really probable.

It is easy to imagine that a lot of place will become not be suitable to human life.

Can you elaborate please ? I am not sure how can a mirror be more expensive than a camera and a screen ?

I'm that kind of person, I fall asleep in 5 minutes. But early wake up and alarm clock are still very painfull to me.

And also FLAP, my personal project: https://gitlab.com/flap-box/flap

The nomenclature of CPU models can be very opaque, that's why I refer to https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/ to compare different CPUs. There can be some surprises performance wise.

Fair point.

Sustainability is a factor of the population times its emission. So the answer would depend on how much we can decrease our emissions.

If I had to guess, I don't think we will be able to reduce our emissions enough to sustain the population density of developed countries. But I am pretty sure that it could be doable if we took all the measures we could take.

I don't know why you are downvoted, those are exactly the main steps to reduce one's emissions.

I have heard somewhere that emissions can be divided roughly in 4 categories:

- Transport. To reduce this category, you need to travel less and if you need to travel, go by foot, bike or public transports.

- Food. To reduce this category you need to reduce you meat consumption, 2 or 3 times a week is enough, buy less transformed goods, ie cook more, and buy local grown food.

- Consumption. To reduce this category, follow the 5 R: Refuse, Reduce, Reuse, Repurpose, Recycle.

- Public emissions. This one is tied to all the public services we get. It can only be reduced by reaching agreements as a society.

As for the children, obviously if we all stop having children, this is all of no use. In developed countries we already have stabilized our demographic growth, so I don't think there is a need for limiting oneself.

I do it to when I need to wake up early so my body is not "surprised" by the low amount of sleep. Works well I think. Do you calculate how many hours you will sleep ? Maybe the brain set some kind of a timer.

I would argue that having your repository on github is a strong way to say "feel free to contribute". Not saying spam is OK, just that having to ask repo maintainers their authorisation seems superfluous.

It was not a time of freedom, but anarchy, where bands of barbarians could roam into your lands and pillage everything.

Please, do not use anarchy as a synonym of disorder, violence or war.

Pity a blog post about defining a word and an idea starts with a wrong definition of a word and an idea.

i.e: Anarchy is about self governance, which theoricaly leads to more freedom than whatever we have now in most country.

The blueprints are hosted on github: https://github.com/bhamla-lab/LoCHAid-2020-PLOS-ONE

Edit: there is also a video showing the building process: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0gnbOJ3nDo

Seems legit to ask whether we can prevent adding more things to those landfills.

Can you explain the difference with openldap ? I have never used AD, and I am satisfied by openldap, I mean once I understood how to configure it...