HN user

arthurdd

13 karma

https://arthurdick.com/

Posts5
Comments16
View on HN

Software development is rarely a solo activity. You will need to communicate with other developers, product managers, designers, and non-technical stakeholders.

The "Participatory Interface Theory" is not a scientific theory. It is a work of science fiction masquerading as physics. It uses the following techniques to create an illusion of credibility:

Poetic Language: Replaces rigorous explanation with evocative metaphors.

Jargon Salad: Mixes terms from physics, computer science, and philosophy to sound profound.

Reverse-Engineering: Builds a complex model designed to reproduce a known anomaly (MOND) and presents this as a success.

The "One Falsifiable Prediction" Gambit: Creates a single, specific (but logically weak) prediction to gain the appearance of being scientific, while ignoring a mountain of contradictory evidence.

While the vision it presents is beautiful and thought-provoking, it has no demonstrable connection to reality.

My site is mainly for my own entertainment, and I've only been contacted a handful of times with nearly 20 years running it.

It is probably helpful to present a competent image when job searching. It shows you can develop and run a site, and that you have interests of your own.

Since experimenting with the GPT models I do notice when posts and articles seem to have used generated content, but I can't identify what it is that gives me this feeling. Maybe it is just a feeling.

When using the models, I find the content generated frequently must be edited to be useful. Presumably if it doesn't wander off or repeat itself too much, there is a human in the loop guiding the generation. Take it as seriously as you would any anonymous post on the Internet.

Fact check important stuff by seeking reputable sources. Treat the rest as entertainment. Even if it is possible to detect, just because text is generated does not mean it's incorrect.

I imagine given the way text is generated using probabilities, it can in theory be detected when stretches of text are using high probability words in sequence. I'm not aware of any tools that do this at the moment though.