HN user

arnon

1,998 karma

https://arnon.dk

Marketing in the new AI world, billing, pricing, monetization, AI agents, and more.

Posts138
Comments354
View on HN
arnon.dk 3d ago

What is usage-based billing? Tokens, credits, and outcomes, explained in STE100

arnon
1pts0
www.solvimon.com 4d ago

Neoclouds owe their customers years of compute

arnon
4pts0
www.solvimon.com 14d ago

What Snowflake, Twilio, and Cursor's pricing rollout teach about token economics

arnon
1pts0
www.solvimon.com 22d ago

Pricing velocity is an ownership problem

arnon
2pts1
arnon.dk 28d ago

You gotta deal with the boring part first

arnon
1pts0
www.businessage.com 1mo ago

The next AI challenge is profitability

arnon
3pts0
www.solvimon.com 1mo ago

How to design pricing for AI APIs and LLM-powered products

arnon
4pts1
twitter.com 1mo ago

Hybrid legal agents can beat frontier models on quality and cost

arnon
2pts0
www.solvimon.com 1mo ago

What building payment products taught me about scalable financial infrastructure

arnon
2pts0
arnon.dk 2mo ago

The current AI pricing was always going to go away

arnon
82pts91
github.com 2mo ago

Academic Research Skills for Claude Code

arnon
82pts25
arnon.dk 2mo ago

Pricing Is a Product Surface

arnon
1pts0
sinceerly.com 3mo ago

Be sinceerly human – AI to undo your AI writing

arnon
11pts13
arnon.dk 3mo ago

Contracted ARR Considered Harmful

arnon
3pts0
www.solvimon.com 3mo ago

How to design credit pricing that buyers trust

arnon
1pts0
saasmetrics.rip 3mo ago

The End of ARR

arnon
2pts3
www.solvimon.com 4mo ago

Question diagnostic: Has your billing architecture hit its ceiling?

arnon
2pts0
arnon.dk 4mo ago

Extend or replace – how to evaluate your billing stack at AI scale

arnon
1pts0
www.businessinsider.com 4mo ago

Silicon Valley is buzzing about this new idea: AI compute as compensation

arnon
4pts6
arnon.dk 4mo ago

Notes on AI Led Growth (ALG)

arnon
1pts0
arnon.dk 5mo ago

Your pricing sucks (and your billing system is why)

arnon
2pts0
www.solvimon.com 5mo ago

Credits are a ledger problem, not a pricing problem

arnon
1pts0
www.solvimon.com 5mo ago

There is no AI pricing playbook. Here's what I'd do instead

arnon
1pts0
www.solvimon.com 5mo ago

The split-stack billing problem

arnon
1pts0
www.nextplatform.com 5mo ago

AMD Makes More Money on GPUs Than CPUs in a Quarter

arnon
2pts0
arnon.dk 5mo ago

Notes on where seat-based pricing is going

arnon
1pts0
arnon.dk 5mo ago

Building a billing system is still hard, even with AI

arnon
2pts0
www.solvimon.com 5mo ago

Hybrid pricing is the default now – here's the data

arnon
4pts0
www.solvimon.com 6mo ago

The Credit Architecture Problem

arnon
1pts0
arnon.dk 7mo ago

The "stranded asset" in AI pricing

arnon
1pts0

If Mastercard and Visa are doing something like this I know it'll go nowhere and die slowly.

They're so full of internal committees I can't imagine this goes anywhere by itself.

The terminology for visa's "Agentic Ready" is "controlled production environments" which is corporate for "we made a press release"...

Bullish on Stripe's MPP - that one has legs.

I wonder if OpenAI will build their own or go with a really big enterprise billing solution coupled with their own home-built metering setup

that's exactly my point - yes

you need to prove beyond a doubt that YOU are the right one to buy from, because it's so easy for 3 Stanford dropouts in a trenchcoat to make a seemingly successful business in just a few days of vibecoding.

If I am a company that builds agents, and I sell it to someone. Then, that someone loses money because this agent did something it wasn't supposed to: who's responsible?

Me as the person who sold it? OpenAI who I use below? Anthropic who performs some of the work too? My customer responsible themselves?

These are questions that classic contracts don't usually cover because things tend to be more deterministic with static code.

And ARR assumes it's recurring too - it's a metric that (people incorrectly think) shows how good your business is at retaining revenue year-over-year.

If a big proportion of contracts in Y1 get terminated at the end of the 12m period (because, say, the customer forgot to renew) - then the ARR will drop like a rock in Y2.

Usage-based will be fine, but if you sell usage-based with a discount that assumes the customer will stay with you for, say, 3 years - this law means they can leave after 1 and not stay for the full length.

Then, you've given a discount that wasn't in your interest to provide.

Agreed, but it does open up some cans of worms where you may accidentally lose customers when they forget to renew (even if they meant to)

The issue is you can't use the "I'll give you a deeper discount for a 3 year contract" line anymore.

It'll potentially create a situation where customers in the US pay a lot less because they still have that incentive.