ariedro

Have you considered that many of the bull/love comments might be from bots?

Protip: If you add "-ai" to the query it removes the slop

Hell has no true bottom.

A glimpse of old times, when the quality of the content mattered more than the presentation.

at least one of the FAANGs already had auto-complete so good it could do most of what LLMs can practically do

Could you clarify what you're referring to? I'm interested.

It would be interesting to have a graph showing AI adoption in coding against the number of weekly outages across different companies. I am sure they are quite correlated.

Well, the LLMs were trained with data that required human effort to write, it's not just random noise. So the result they can give is, indirectly and probabilistically regurgitated, human effort.

Do you know the difference between a curve and its derivative?

Or the opposite might happen:

https://notbyai.fyi/

What makes you so sure of it? LLMs are just the novelty of the moment, no empirical evidence yet indicates that it's the direction the industry is going to take, it could just be just another fad like VR or web3.

Two days before 9/11 happens, talk about creepy numerology.

Because that wasn't happening in the first place?

Fewer than var or let?

I thought the title was about which Git server platform is going to be the successor to GitHub once we've had enough of Microsoft's bs.

Love that the cheats are just program statements that can be understood, instead of some obscure rom or memory hacking. This is how software always should have been like.

The "do what you want with the software I wrote freely, even if you gain money with it and give nothing in return" approach sounds pretty virgin to me