HN user

arb99

1,512 karma
Posts49
Comments169
View on HN
www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk 11y ago

IPv6 Leakage and DNS Hijacking in Commercial VPN Clients [pdf]

arb99
25pts3
blog.sucuri.net 11y ago

Unmasking Pirated Premium WordPress Plugins (& the malware that comes with them)

arb99
2pts0
blog.sucuri.net 11y ago

Fake JQuery Scripts in Nulled WordPress Plugins (analysis)

arb99
3pts0
blog.fox-it.com 11y ago

CryptoPHP: Analysis of a hidden threat inside popular content management systems

arb99
11pts1
heise.de 11y ago

How you could have remotely unlocked any of 2.2M BMWs with ConnectedDrive

arb99
1pts0
en.wikipedia.org 11y ago

Keystroke dynamics

arb99
1pts0
www.reddit.com 11y ago

Andrew Weinreich doing an /r/iama on reddit

arb99
1pts0
www.bbc.com 11y ago

What happens when lightning hits the sea? (BBC)

arb99
1pts0
www.bbc.com 11y ago

What price for free wifi? (BBC report on tracking users via wifi)

arb99
2pts0
www.bbc.com 12y ago

How odd is a cluster of plane accidents?

arb99
155pts83
www.youtube.com 12y ago

Brothers In Arms: Bank Job (Charity has 'innovative' for corporate sponsors)

arb99
1pts0
blog.celingest.com 12y ago

Seeding Torrents from S3

arb99
1pts0
news.ycombinator.com 12y ago

Ask HN: Who do you use for offsite data backup?

arb99
1pts0
www.independent.co.uk 12y ago

MI6 and MI5 'refuse to use Lenovo computers'

arb99
3pts1
randomascii.wordpress.com 13y ago

Will a floating point operation always evaluate to the same result?

arb99
4pts0
www.bbc.co.uk 13y ago

The 'cyber-attack' threat to London's Olympic ceremony

arb99
19pts33
www.youtube.com 13y ago

What exactly is one second? (Video)

arb99
3pts0
en.wikipedia.org 13y ago

Length extension attack

arb99
1pts0
en.wikipedia.org 13y ago

Esquivalience

arb99
96pts25
arstechnica.com 13y ago

A behind-the-scenes look at LinkedIn’s mobile engineering

arb99
2pts0
arstechnica.com 13y ago

A behind-the-scenes look at Facebook release engineering

arb99
1pts0
dashes.com 13y ago

The Verification Process on Twitter and what features you get with it

arb99
1pts2
unix4lyfe.org 13y ago

Some Notes About Time

arb99
210pts113
rubular.com 13y ago

Rubular - a Ruby regular expression editor

arb99
161pts36
www.cyberciti.biz 13y ago

OpenSSH Server Best Practices (security related)

arb99
43pts23
www.youtube.com 13y ago

Advanced Movie Computer Generated Special Effects (with models/wireframes)

arb99
3pts0
news.ycombinator.com 13y ago

Ask HN: I'm based in UK but want to bill US customers. Any recommended services?

arb99
2pts2
googledocs.blogspot.co.uk 14y ago

Google Docs - can now paste images from your desktop

arb99
1pts0
github.com 14y ago

Kitty Radar - Face detection for cats in JS

arb99
3pts0
grepular.com 14y ago

Protecting a Laptop from Simple and Sophisticated Attacks

arb99
130pts53

Things like Vim can speed up coding, you spend less time on the actual editing of the text. I used to just use vim (macvim in fact), but for php i recently (1 year?) switched to PhpStorm with a VIM plugin. That was a huge speed increase, being able to cmd+click on method names and be taken to its code and probably about 20-30 other features i use in php storm that i never had in macvim (even with a whole bunch of vim plugins).

(the vim plugin in phpstorm isn't perfect, but definitely good enough)

But I find the biggest speed ups are things like:

- using frameworks (and knowing about them - so you know everything the framework contains/can do) speeds a lot of things up. It helps to know a framework inside out as well as a majority of the popular libraries that are used with it.

- And knowing what libraries exist to do whatever job you are trying to do can save a lot of time. I think almost everyone has at one point coded something then later on found a perfect library (or even 'snippet') that they could use and would have saved a lot of time. As long as the library is mature enough I'd always prefer to include a library and use that rather than spend hours/a day/days/longer on coding something from scratch. It also helps if something stops working - you can probably find someone with experience with that library. Of course it does come with the disadvantage of it might not 100% fit what you need to do...

But it isn't like coding is a race. You often save a lot of time by going slower and planning things out. I used to plan apps out in a text file, but realised a few years ago that getting away from the computer and planning out everything on paper (lots of sheets of paper, lots of arrows, lots of mess, but in the end it makes sense) gets everything planned correctly before even coding, so there is no need to refactor big sections of your app. I always have a notebook of notes when programming now... even with lots of squiggles and messy handwriting it helps a lot more than notes in text files or even worse notes (like in depth to do notes) in /* comments */ or //comments .

Magic 11 years ago

This will get abused by fraud really quickly.

I actually thought it was a corrupt file or something - it doesn't sound like anything I'd be able to pick out and understand.

If someone can understand at that speed, listening to audiobooks must be a very quick activity...

Despite Spotify occasionally being in the news for not paying the artists much, I bet this does add a lot of new revenue for the music industry.

Before I joined spotify (about a year ago) I hardly ever bought CDs or MP3s (defintely less than the £120/year that Sptofy costs) - there must be many other people also who are paying for Spotify now who never used to spend much on music before

referrer spam is something that has been happening to years, and GA is actually quite good at filtering it comapred to a lot of other stats programs out there. This is really not an issue.

ive been a subscriber of their email newsletter for a while now. (Only noticed emails in last few weeks though). but everytime i see one, i always open it, one of the few engaging newsletters.

(i'm not interviewing for any position, just think its decent content and well laid out).

Looks interesting, might implement this on a project soon.

Their pricing is a bit iffy though... " The Face++ APIs are currently provided free of charge. However, Face++ may charge fees for future use of or access to the Face++ APIs or the Face++ services according to its sole discretion. If Face++ decides to charge for the Face++ APIs Services, Face++ will provide you prior notice of such charges. Face++ may also charge You when providing You a service different from the service under these Terms; for example, we may charge additional fees for excessive API use. "

not even a rough clue given as to how much they'll charge (could be reasonable, or very expensive)...

but, still, looks very good

This is hardly a new thing.

Ad networks have always had (a very small %, but still there) a problem with people using exploits in flash ads. Especially ad networks for more 'dodgy' sites, that auto enable ads with no checking, no real checking if the advertiser is a legit business etc... (not that the adnetwork that this post is talking about deals with dodgy sites, but just saying its a common-ish problem (when given the 100s of thousands of ad impressions every day by ad networks).

I think i heard that malware nowadays is spread through more ads on adult websites (via 3rd party ad networks, not the sites themselves) than any other method, but i'm not sure on the source for that.

1) Who cares about ads on Facebook? They are not giant ads, or popunders or whatever. Sometimes they are relevant. The FB page 'ads' (that say they are sponsored) can be very relevant sometimes. People care more about things like privacy, and how easy it is to share things ('statuses' / photos / videos) with certain people.

2) The design (no offense to whoever made it) is a bit weird. Monospaced font?

3) The part where you click on the arrow (on the right of the page). It isn't clear what that is about. It is 'invite only' but they want you to submit a photo? (https://www.dropbox.com/s/wx88cyg0lh3u5j8/Screenshot%202014-...)

4) and the profiles do look (again no offense) like a crappy tumblr blog (with a touch of instagram, which IMO isn't really a social network (no messaging, it is just a fancy photo gallery site. No one would call flickr a social networking site). Maybe thats the kind of audience they are going after... but it looks a bit amateurish. Whereas facebook, linkedin, even twitter all look a lot more fine tuned.

5) But profiles seem to be able to have direct outgoing links (no nofollow, which will encourage spam a little bit), so if it wasn't invite only it would get filled up with spam quickly.

Transmit for iOS 12 years ago

Almost all FTP programs have sFTP support built in (and I can't see FTP programs starting to call themselves SFTP programs). I know transmit for mac does support sftp (and a few other things like amazon s3, webdav), so despite this being an FTP program I would expect the iOS version to support sftp.

Transmit for iOS 12 years ago

Not sure what this is referring to. I have Transmit for Mac.

It is pretty much bug free, and works great (its my go to FTP program). There aren't really any features I wish it had that doesn't already. (Really with an FTP program, if it transfers and downloads files correctly (and has an easy way to edit files in an external editor) what else should it do...

Not really. With more people with iPads etc (and obviously just on normal desktops) they have less need to read physical magazines.

People who buy Rolex and other luxury brand watches aren't really the target market.

There is a reason there are no LCD type watches (/smart watches) with luxury watch brand names on them. thats not their target audience.

Hell, most rolex's are automatic (not quartz). Its about the perceived quality of the watchmaker/the insides for most people who buy luxury brands watches. And people buy good quality watches because they last for years and years. A smart watch won't (you could wear a watch from the 80s now, and it would not look out of place. I can't imagine wearing a iWatch in 30 years...)

You could compare it to the watches made by consumer brands like Gucci, Armani etc though i guess.

Tinder would be able to counter a little this by showing the % that the other person swiped right. Women (and I guess Men) would be able to filter out those who swipe right 80%+ of the time...

(I've not used it - maybe this already show this?)